POLLING OF PERSONS BY AN ADVOCATE-DEFENDER AS MEANS OF COLLECTING EVIDENCES IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
( Pp. 161-164)

Task: The given article is dedicated to the analysis of poll of persons by an advocate-defender as means of collecting evidences in criminal procedure. Despite the fact, that the legislator has fixed a right for an advocate-defender to actively search for information, useful to his defendant, still it’s quite hard to see poll of persons in a criminal case. Through this article, the author intends to dissuade any doubts in legality of such a mean to collect evidences. Relevancy: this article examines a debatable question on whether the information in person polls (collected by an advocate-defender) possesses any procedural importance. In the given article, the author is trying to convince, that as a result of person polls conducted by an advocate-defender, we obtain evidences. Conclusions: Through analyses the author comes to a conclusion that person polls, conducted by an advocate-defender should be viewed as a lawful, procedural way of collecting evidences and obtained information should be viewed as proper evidences, which must be subjoined to a criminal case. Herewith, the author presumes that no additions to the Criminal Procedure Code should be implemented.

Mamedov R.Y., (2016), POLLING OF PERSONS BY AN ADVOCATE-DEFENDER AS MEANS OF COLLECTING EVIDENCES IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 161-164.

Arslanova A.R. Problemy iz yatiya predmetov i dokumentov do vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela//Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve//№1. 2015. S.247.
Akhtyamova K.M. Osnovnye etapy razvitiya instituta gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva// CHernye dyry v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve//№6. 2014. S.63.
Davletov A. Pravo zashchitnika sobirat dokazatel stva//Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. №7;
Kanishcheva A. Ugolovnyy protsess: Uchebnik/A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskiy; Pod obshch. red. A.V. Smirnova SPb., 2006. S.190.
Kuznetsov N., Dadonov S. Pravo zashchitnika sobirat dokazatel stva: sushchnost i predely//Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. №8. S.32; Parshutkin V.V. Opros advokatom lits s ikh soglasiya//Vozmozhnosti zashchity v ramkakh novogo UPK Rossii: Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii advokatov/Pod redaktsiey G.M. Reznik i E.YU. L vovoy. M., 2004. S.62-71.
Martynchik E.G. Pravovye osnovaniya advokatskogo rassledovaniya: sostoyanie i perspektivy (k razrabotke kontseptsii i modeli)//Advokatskaya praktika. 2003. №6. S.4-11.
Maslov I. Advokatskoe rassledovanie // Zakonnost : №10. 2004. SPS Konsul tant Plyus. Data obrashcheniya 14.01.2016
Permyakov S.V. Polnomochiya zashchitnika na stadii predvaritel nogo sledstviya po delam ob iznasilovanii//Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. №3. S.150.
Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskiy K.B.Ugolovnyy protsess: Uchebnik/A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskiy; Pod obshch. red. A.V. Smirnova SPb., 2006. S.190.
CHebotareva I.N. Ugolovno-protsessual noe znachenie svedeniy, sobrannykh advokatom-zashchitnikom v rezul tate oprosa litsa s ego soglasiya//Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2010. №1. SPS Konsul tant Plyus. Data obrashcheniya 14.01.2016.
Kamyshin V.A. Zashchitnik kak sub ekt sobiraniya dokazatel stv: zhelaemoe i deystvitel noe//Vestnik OGU. 2005. №3 S.61-64;
SHkalov I.A. Rol zashchitnika v protsesse dokazyvaniya pri proizvodstve rassledovaniya po ugolovnomu delu//Zakon i pravo. 2004. №11. S.19-22;
CHebotareva I.N. Ugolovno-protsessual noe znachenie svedeniy, sobrannykh advokatom-zashchitnikom v rezul tate oprosa litsa s ego soglasiya//Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2010. №1.

a survey of persons with their consent, defender, the investigator, the criminal process, methods of gathering evidence.