The Constitutional Court and the key problems of the Criminal Procedure legislation
( Pp. 11-14)
More about authors
Zherebtsova Elena E.
kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, docent, docent kafedry gosudarstvenno-pravovyh disciplin
Belgorod Legal Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Russia of name I.D. Putilina, Belgorod (Russia) Bolgova Victoria V. d-r yurid. nauk, professor. Dolzhnost: zaveduyuschaya kafedroy. Mesto raboty: Samarskiy gosudarstvennyy ekonomicheskiy universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava.
Samara State University of Economics
Belgorod Legal Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Russia of name I.D. Putilina, Belgorod (Russia) Bolgova Victoria V. d-r yurid. nauk, professor. Dolzhnost: zaveduyuschaya kafedroy. Mesto raboty: Samarskiy gosudarstvennyy ekonomicheskiy universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava.
Samara State University of Economics
Abstract:
Background: At the present stage of development of jurisprudence and constitutional practice problems influence the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the criminal procedure law are increasingly becoming the subject of intense scientific attention . They are viewed through the prism of the theory of sources of law, legal protection, legal policy, legal doctrine of pragmatism et al. In the works of Russian (K.B. Kalinowskiy, E.D. Hozhaeva) and foreign authors (J. Desautels-Stein). Materials and Methods: The empirical base of the study was the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (judgment , determination , including the positive content ) , studied the author's procedure will reveal nodes conflict aspects of legal regulation and the main reasons for their occurrence. Results: The factors that influence how the process of legal regulation, and the degree of satisfaction of public and private interests in the legal protection. Conclusions: The basic directions of improving the law-making and law enforcement, formed by the method of analysis of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as an indicator of the system of legal regulation.
How to Cite:
Zherebtsova E.E., Bolgova V.V., (2015), THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND THE KEY PROBLEMS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LEGISLATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 11-14.
Reference list:
Bolgova V.V. Publichnoe pravo (problemy teorii, metodologii, praktiki): Dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. Tambovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. G.R. Derzhavina. Samara, 2009. 512s.
Bolgova V.V., ZHerebtsova E.E. Formy i sredstva zhilishchnoy politiki v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. S. 24-29.
Vayman G.V., Maslov A.S. Ot dogmatiki k pragmatike: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii po delu Markina v kontekste sovremennykh podkhodov k sootnosheniyu mezhdunarodnogo i natsional nogo prava // Sravnitel noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2014. № 2 (99). S. 127-137.
Desautels-Stein J. At War with the Eclectics: Mapping Pragmatism in Contemporary Legal Analysis // Michigan State Law Review. 2007. No. 3. P. 565-630.
ZHerebtsova E.E. Sudebnyy konstitutsionnyy kontrol kak konstitutsionno-pravovoy institut. Belgorod: Belgorodskiy universitet kooperatsii, ekonomiki i prava, 2012. 251 s.
Kalinovskiy K.B. UPK RF: na chto zhaluemsya // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2012. № 5. S. 11.
Ofitsial nyy sayt Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://www.ksrf.ru
KHozhaeva E.D. Uzlovye problemy Ugolovnogo protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: rezul taty analiza obrashcheniy grazhdan v Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http:// www/iuaj.net/node/ 988
Bolgova V.V., ZHerebtsova E.E. Formy i sredstva zhilishchnoy politiki v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. S. 24-29.
Vayman G.V., Maslov A.S. Ot dogmatiki k pragmatike: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii po delu Markina v kontekste sovremennykh podkhodov k sootnosheniyu mezhdunarodnogo i natsional nogo prava // Sravnitel noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2014. № 2 (99). S. 127-137.
Desautels-Stein J. At War with the Eclectics: Mapping Pragmatism in Contemporary Legal Analysis // Michigan State Law Review. 2007. No. 3. P. 565-630.
ZHerebtsova E.E. Sudebnyy konstitutsionnyy kontrol kak konstitutsionno-pravovoy institut. Belgorod: Belgorodskiy universitet kooperatsii, ekonomiki i prava, 2012. 251 s.
Kalinovskiy K.B. UPK RF: na chto zhaluemsya // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2012. № 5. S. 11.
Ofitsial nyy sayt Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://www.ksrf.ru
KHozhaeva E.D. Uzlovye problemy Ugolovnogo protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: rezul taty analiza obrashcheniy grazhdan v Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http:// www/iuaj.net/node/ 988
Keywords:
The Constitutional Court, constitutional proceedings, the criminal process, judicial review.
