Expert`s status in civil justice at various stages of implementation of his procedural functions
( Pp. 118-120)

More about authors
Chernova Maria Nikolaevna Dolzhnost: generalnyy direktor
Arbitrazh consulting LLC
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the question of rights, duties and responsibility of the examiner entrusted with the conduct of judicial review in civil and arbitration process. The author analyzes the procedural legislation for the identification of the purpose and nature of activities of the expert at different stages in the performance of their functions. Also considers the problem of implementing an expert of rights and duties in legal proceedings in civil and arbitration process. The findings allow to reveal the legal status of an expert in at different stages in civil proceedings in relation to the rights of persons participating in the case. Expressed by the author of the proposals on improvement of legislation aimed at improving the efficiency expert and enforcing the rights of persons participating in the case, during the judicial examination of the expert's conclusion. The article can be useful for students and graduates of law schools, lawyers, judges, experts, scientists and teachers.
How to Cite:
Chernova M.N., (2015), EXPERT`S STATUS IN CIVIL JUSTICE AT VARIOUS STAGES OF IMPLEMENTATION OF HIS PROCEDURAL FUNCTIONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 118-120.
Reference list:
D yakonova O. G. Zaklyucheniya i pokazaniya eksperta i spetsialista // Biznes v zakone № 1 2008
Lifshits E.M., Mikhaylov V.A. Naznachenie i proizvodstvo ekspertizy. M.: VSSH MVD RF, 1977. s.34
Orekhanova G.V. Dokazatel stvennoe znachenie zaklyucheniya i pokazaniy spetsialista // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve № 4 2009. s. 270
Rossinskaya E.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v ugolovnom, grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: Prakticheskoe posobie. M., 1996. s. 22
Ryzhakov A.P. Osnovaniya dlya otvoda prokurora, sekretarya sudebnogo zasedaniya, eksperta, spetsialista, perevodchika v grazhdanskom protsesse. Kommentariy k stat e 18 GPK RF. Podgotovlen dlya sistemy Konsul tantPlyus.
Keywords:
forensic examination, rights and obligations of the expert, the arbitration process, civil process.


Related Articles

Issue №5584
The concept and the legal nature of the legal and law services
legal assistance legal service legal service civil process the administrative process
Show more
Issue №10195
THE CHANNELS OF PENETRATION OF FIREARMS IN THE NORTH CAUCASIAN FEDERAL DISTRICT
ballistics firearms crime forensic examination forensics
Show more
Issue №6062
THE CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE IN CIVIL LITIGATION OF HONG KONG, SINGAPORE AND MALAYSIA
proof civil process classification the best evidence Hong Kong
Show more
Issue №16644
Method for identifying from digital form (images) of typical interventions to text information (color, type ink, signs, video change)
modification typical interventions in textual information forensic examination fake digital form
Show more
Issue №9342
REEXAMINATION IN CIVIL PROCESS
forensic psychiatric examination civil process expert opinion expert re-examination
Show more
Issue №9525
THE PROCEDURE OF PROVIDING EVIDENCE BY THE COURT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
civil process proof the procedure of providing evidence
Show more
Issue №4748
Presumptions in civil procedure of Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia
the presumption proof the burden of proof civil process facts
Show more
Issue №20591
Features of Using Special Knowledge in the Investigation of Crimes Related with Illegal Traffic of False Medicines, Medical Devices and Biologically Active Supplements
protection of life and health of the population the quality of medicines and medical products falsification of medicines, medical devices and dietary supplements illegal traffic crime investigations
Show more
Issue №11394
THE CONCEPT OF UNITY OF «CLAIM» CATEGORY IN THE CIVIL-LEGAL AND CIVIL-PROCESS ASPECT
right the claim civil law civil process the concept of the unity of the category "claim"
Show more
Issue №3884
DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS AS A MEASURE OF RESPONSIBILITY IN ARBITRATION PROCEDURE
court costs the measure of responsibility the arbitration process unscrupulous behavior abuse of procedural law
Show more