Connection of claims in administrative proceedings
( Pp. 138-143)
More about authors
Velichko Mikhail Borisovich
Dolzhnost: prepodavatel. Mesto raboty: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet pravosudiya. Filial: Zapadno-Sibirskiy filial. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo prava i processa.
Russian State University of Justice. Branch: West Siberian Branch
Russian State University of Justice. Branch: West Siberian Branch
Abstract:
The presented article deals with the problems of combining several requirements for joint consideration in administrative proceedings. The current legislation does not establish the possibility of joining and joint consideration in the administrative proceedings of several related requirements, if at least one of them is subject to review in other proceedings. This situation does not contribute to the processual economy, speed and correctness of judicial decisions. The author justifies the expediency of interconnection of related requirements, considered in administrative order, on examples of judicial practice shows the possibility of such a connection, proposes to supplement the legislation with norms that increase the efficiency of the mechanism of judicial protection of rights and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations.
How to Cite:
Velichko M.B., (2018), CONNECTION OF CLAIMS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 138-143.
Reference list:
Butnev V.V. K ponyatiyu mekhanizma zashchity sub ektivnykh prav// Sub ektivnoe pravo: problemy osushchestvleniya i zashchity. Vladivostok, 1989. S.7.
Butnev V.V. Ponyatie mekhanizma zashchity sub ektivnykh prav// Mekhanizm zashchity sub ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav. YAroslavl , 1990. S.11.
Bonner A.T. Proizvodstvo po delam, voznikayushchim iz publichnykh pravootnosheniy, v GPK i APK RF / Bonner A.T. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu. SPb., 2005. S. 931 - 932, 927
Bondareva E.A., (2017), Organizatsionno-pravovye problemy administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 3: 231-232.
Velichko M.B. Obzor i analiz osnovnykh kriteriev differentsiatsii form sudoproizvodstva: grazhdanskoy i administrativnoy. Nashi vyvody po opredeleniyu formy sudoproizvodstva po otdel nym kategoriyam del//Gumanitarnye, sotsial no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki, №10-2015. chast 1. S. 154, 155.S. 156-160.
Velichko M.B. Sravnitel nyy analiz kontrol noy funktsii sudebnoy vlasti i eye realizatsii v administrativnom i grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve// Sbornik statey po itogam nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, prokhodivshey 21-23 oktyabrya 2015 goda v g. Belokurikha Voprosy primeneniya Kodeksa Administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF . S. 27-28.
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 31.05.2011 №145 Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del o vozmeshchenii vreda, prichinennogo gosudarstvennymi organami, organami mestnogo samoupravleniya, a takzhe ikh dolzhnostnymi litsami //Vestnik VAS RF, 2011, № 8.
Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii del o prisuzhdenii kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ilim prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok , utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 31.08.2011//SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 15.02.2017 №77-KG16-15//SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 08.10.2014 №24-KG14-6 //SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17.11.2015 N 50 O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva pri rassmotrenii nekotorykh voprosov, voznikayushchikh v khode ispolnitel nogo proizvodstva //SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 02.07.2009 N 14 quot;O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri primenenii ZHilishchnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;//SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 20.12.1994 N 10 (red. ot 06.02.2007) quot;Nekotorye voprosy primeneniya zakonodatel stva o kompensatsii moral nogo vreda quot; //SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29 noyabrya 2007 g. N 48 quot;O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del ob osparivanii normativnykh pravovykh aktov polnost yu ili v chasti quot;//SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Samsonov N.V., (2017), Zavershena li diskussiya o pravovoy prirode administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 3: 201-203.
Butnev V.V. Ponyatie mekhanizma zashchity sub ektivnykh prav// Mekhanizm zashchity sub ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav. YAroslavl , 1990. S.11.
Bonner A.T. Proizvodstvo po delam, voznikayushchim iz publichnykh pravootnosheniy, v GPK i APK RF / Bonner A.T. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu. SPb., 2005. S. 931 - 932, 927
Bondareva E.A., (2017), Organizatsionno-pravovye problemy administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 3: 231-232.
Velichko M.B. Obzor i analiz osnovnykh kriteriev differentsiatsii form sudoproizvodstva: grazhdanskoy i administrativnoy. Nashi vyvody po opredeleniyu formy sudoproizvodstva po otdel nym kategoriyam del//Gumanitarnye, sotsial no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki, №10-2015. chast 1. S. 154, 155.S. 156-160.
Velichko M.B. Sravnitel nyy analiz kontrol noy funktsii sudebnoy vlasti i eye realizatsii v administrativnom i grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve// Sbornik statey po itogam nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, prokhodivshey 21-23 oktyabrya 2015 goda v g. Belokurikha Voprosy primeneniya Kodeksa Administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF . S. 27-28.
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 31.05.2011 №145 Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del o vozmeshchenii vreda, prichinennogo gosudarstvennymi organami, organami mestnogo samoupravleniya, a takzhe ikh dolzhnostnymi litsami //Vestnik VAS RF, 2011, № 8.
Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii del o prisuzhdenii kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ilim prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok , utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 31.08.2011//SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 15.02.2017 №77-KG16-15//SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 08.10.2014 №24-KG14-6 //SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17.11.2015 N 50 O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva pri rassmotrenii nekotorykh voprosov, voznikayushchikh v khode ispolnitel nogo proizvodstva //SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 02.07.2009 N 14 quot;O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri primenenii ZHilishchnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;//SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 20.12.1994 N 10 (red. ot 06.02.2007) quot;Nekotorye voprosy primeneniya zakonodatel stva o kompensatsii moral nogo vreda quot; //SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29 noyabrya 2007 g. N 48 quot;O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del ob osparivanii normativnykh pravovykh aktov polnost yu ili v chasti quot;//SPS-Konsul tantPlyus.
Samsonov N.V., (2017), Zavershena li diskussiya o pravovoy prirode administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 3: 201-203.
Keywords:
administrative proceedings, the combination of several requirements, judicial control, joint consideration.
