Permanent joint advisory bodies of the subjects of the Russian Federation - a comparative legal analysis
( Pp. 33-36)

The role of the executive authorities of the Federation in maintaining a stable socio-economic situation of the Russian regions and achieve sustainable economic and social development is extremely high. Effective functioning of these bodies is largely achieved by their interaction with the authorities of other subjects of the Russian Federation, however, in practice, often lacking the legal, administrative and procedural regulation of this process. In the scientific and legal circles said process is also neglected. In the article the author is seen trying to attract the attention of researchers in the field of public administration to the problem of imperfection administrative and procedural regulation of the procedure and rules of engagement. In his study, the author uses the method of analysis and synthesis, structural-functional method, the method of analogy, legalistic approach, the interpretation of the law. In this paper the main place is a comparative analysis of legal regulation of the activities of the two permanent joint advisory body on the main components of work, identify gaps administrative and procedural regulation of the Coordination Council, showing the limited nature of the provisions of its activities, the results of this research is to identify the shortcomings of the administrative and procedural nature presented its conclusions and proposals to improve the legal, administrative and procedural regulation of interaction and activity of collegial bodies. Scientific novelty of research due to the author's treatment of the problem, not investigated in legal jurisprudence. Thus, this article has a certain scientific value, since it may give rise to the modern and highly sought scientific direction, which in the future smears filled with new scientific knowledge and followers. In addition, this article can have very positive social impact. The presence of clear mechanisms of cooperation between the various authorities of the Russian Federation, as well as more firmly established in the legislation of the ways of such interaction, without a doubt, will allow to successfully solve a number of problems of regional development of Russia.

Efimov N.V., (2015), PERMANENT JOINT ADVISORY BODIES OF THE SUBJECTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION - A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 33-36.

Vestnik pravitel stva Leningradskoy oblasti. 2012. 14 dekabrya. N 118.
Lyubushkin V.A Mekhanizm razdeleniya vlasti v federativnom gosudarstve // zhurnal Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki , №4 2013 g., S. 13-16
Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy ot 26 noyabrya 2010 goda № 4501-5 GD// Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2010. № 49. St. 6468.
Polozhenie ob Apparate Ob edinennoy kollegii p.5.5
Putin V. Rossiya na rubezhe tysyacheletiya Gazeta Nezavisimaya 30.12.1999
Reglament raboty ob edinennoy kollegii ispolnitel nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti Moskvy i Moskovskoy oblasti. Utv. rasporyazheniem Mera Moskvy i Gubernatora Moskovskoy oblasti ot 28 fevralya 2002 g. N 112-RM/150-RG
Reglament Gosudarstvennoy Dumy FS RF (v red. postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 oktyabrya 2002 goda № 3172-III GD// Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. № 44. St. 4336;
Rossiyskaya gazeta 11.01.2012 vypusk №5675
Trunina E.V., Aktual nye problemy teorii administrativnykh reglamentov federal nykh organov ispolnitel noy vlasti // zhurnal Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki, №4 2012 g., S. 28-31
10. RIA Novosti 24.06.2013
Filippov A.N Konstitutsionno-pravovoy mekhanizm obespecheniya edinstva pravovogo prostranstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ponyatie i soderzhanie // quot;Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve quot;. 2013. №4.
CHirkin V. E. O sushchnosti sub ekta Federatsii: traditsii i realii , Gosudarstvo i pravo , 2003, № 7. S. 9

Leningrad oblast, Moscow, Moscow oblast, Executive authorities, Saint Petersburg.