Topical Problems Emerging in the Implementation of Victims' Rights in Criminal Prosecution
( Pp. 214-217)
More about authors
Bayanov Artem Ernestovich
adyunkt. Mesto ucheby: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii. Podrazdelenie: kafedra upravleniya organami rassledovaniya prestupleniy.
Management academy of MIA Russia
Management academy of MIA Russia
Abstract:
The aim. Victims take one of the central roles in the Russian criminal trial. They are active participants at all stages of criminal proceedings. Noteworthy, the practice shows that, despite the guarantees enshrined in the Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the actual position of victims does not provide the opportunity to fully protect their rights and defend the legitimate interests while being involved in the criminal process. Therefore, the aim of this work was with the basis on the analysis of the legal acts to identify the problems in the current Russian legislation regarding victims’ rights, to systemize them into separate groups and to suggest the ways to overcome them. The methodology. The study of the issue was carried out by analyzing the legislation of the Russian Federation and the scientific literature sources in the field of victims’ rights. The conclusions. The results of the work were the identification of problems regarding victims’ rights during criminal proceedings and the classification of these problems in three main groups: a) the problems which violate victims’ rights while filing a report to the law enforcement agencies or initiating a criminal case and are conditioned by both the gaps in the criminal procedure law and the low effectiveness of the law enforcement activities; b) the problems which are related to pre-trial investigations; c) the problems which are connected with the compensation of monetary and moral damages to a victim. The author also suggested the certain ways to solve the mentioned problems which would allow the Russian legislation to correspond to the fundamental principles of the protection and restoration of victims’ violated rights, liberties and legitimate interests. The social consequences. The solutions to the identified problems will allow to increase the level and quality in realization of victims’ rights during criminal proceedings, which in turn will guarantee human rights and liberties as well as the supremacy of universal values inherent to the state of law. The contribution. This work can be useful for developing the measures aimed to remove the existing gaps and improving the Russian legislation in the field of victims’ rights.
How to Cite:
Bayanov A.E., (2015), TOPICAL PROBLEMS EMERGING IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF VICTIMS' RIGHTS IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 214-217.
Reference list:
Belkin A. R. Protsessual nyy status poterpevshego nuzhdaetsya v peresmotre // Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2010. № 3. S. 64-67.
Bozrov V. M., Kobyakov V. M. Ot prestupleniya do prigovora: o pravakh tekh, kto voleyu sud by stal uchastnikom ugolovnogo protsessa. Ekaterinburg: Diamant, 1996. 128 s.
Brusnitsyn L. V. Uchastie poterpevshego v ugolovnom protsesse: kakie slozhnosti dlya pravoprimeniteley sozdali raz yasneniya Plenuma VS RF // Ugolovnyy protsess: Praktika uspeshnoy zashchity i obvineniya. 2011. № 2. S. 68-75.
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: prinyata rezolyutsiey 217 A (III) General noy assamblei OON ot 10 dekabrya 1948 goda // URL: http://www.un.org/ru/ documents/udhr/.
Gavrilov B.YA. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii: tsifry i fakty. M., 2008. C. 208.
Gaevskiy N.M. Zolushki i favority novogo UPK RF // Aktual nye problemy bor by s prestupnost yu: sb. statey. M.: NORMA, 2003. S. 86-90.
Deklaratsiya osnovnykh printsipov pravosudiya dlya zhertv prestupleniy i zloupotrebleniy vlast yu: prinyata Rezolyutsiey General noy Assambleey OON ot 29 noyabrya 1985 goda 40/34 // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1992 g. № 9-10. S. 39.
Zakon RSFSR ot 27.10.1960 g. Ob utverzhdenii ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa RSFSR (vstupil v silu s 01.01.1961 g.).
Kobets P.N., Krasnova K.A. O probleme vozmeshcheniya vreda poterpevshim na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2009. № 4. S. 30-35.
Komarov S. A., Mal ko A. V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M.: Norma, 2004. 442 c.
Komissarov V.I. Poterpevshiy - tsentral naya figura ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 9. S. 31-33.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 N 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 N 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 N 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 N 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 04.08.2014. № 31, st. 4398.
Luneev V.V. Prestupnost XX veka. Mirovye, regional nye i rossiyskie tendentsii. M.: Izdatel stvo Norma, 1997. S. 525.
Mazyuk R. V. Institut ugolovnogo presledovaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: YUrlitinform, 2009. 216 s.
Pasternak N.A. Realizatsiya funktsii zashchity v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve po deystvuyushchemu ugolovno-protsessual nomu zakonodatel stvu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2009. № 3. S. 169 - 171.
Postanovlenie VTSIK ot 15.02.1923 goda Ob utverzhdenii Ugolovno-protsessual nogo Kodeksa RSFSR // Izvestiya VTSIK. № 37. 18.02.1923.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 235. 10.12.1998.
Savitskiy V. I. Vozmeshchenie ushcherba gosudarstvom // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1992. № 6. S. 12-14.
Skoblikov P.A. Sovremennye problemy vozmeshcheniya vreda litsam, postradavshim ot prestupleniy i zakonodatel nye resheniya // Zakon. 2012. № 8. S.87-92.
Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 23. 08. 2004. № 34, st. 3534.
Statisticheskie svedeniya GIATS MVD Rossii o sostoyanii prestupnosti za 1991 - 2014 gg.
Stroykova A.S. K voprosu o razumnosti srokov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v aspekte realizatsii prav obvinyaemogo i poterpevshego // Biznes v zakone. 2013. № 1. S. 40 - 42.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 N 174-FZ (red. ot 21.07.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 06.08.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 24. 12. 2001, № 52 (ch. I), st. 4921.
Federal nyy zakon ot 20. 08. 2004 № 119-FZ O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (red. ot 03. 02. 2014, s izm. ot 04. 06. 2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 23. 08. 2004, № 34, st. 3534.
Fomenko A.N. K voprosu o trudnostyakh realizatsii otdel nykh protsessual nykh prav poterpevshim v ugolovnom dele na dosudebnom proizvodstve // Biznes v zakone. 2011. № 6. S. 74 - 76.
Elektronnyy resurs http: // www.mvd.ru / stats / (data obrashcheniya: 18.10.2014 g.).
Elektronnyy resurs http://www.pvlast.ru/archive/ index.378.php/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.10.2014 g.).
Elektronnyy resurs http://www.oprf.ru/files/2013 dok/o rabote OPRF15052013.pdf/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.10.2014 g.).
Bozrov V. M., Kobyakov V. M. Ot prestupleniya do prigovora: o pravakh tekh, kto voleyu sud by stal uchastnikom ugolovnogo protsessa. Ekaterinburg: Diamant, 1996. 128 s.
Brusnitsyn L. V. Uchastie poterpevshego v ugolovnom protsesse: kakie slozhnosti dlya pravoprimeniteley sozdali raz yasneniya Plenuma VS RF // Ugolovnyy protsess: Praktika uspeshnoy zashchity i obvineniya. 2011. № 2. S. 68-75.
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: prinyata rezolyutsiey 217 A (III) General noy assamblei OON ot 10 dekabrya 1948 goda // URL: http://www.un.org/ru/ documents/udhr/.
Gavrilov B.YA. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii: tsifry i fakty. M., 2008. C. 208.
Gaevskiy N.M. Zolushki i favority novogo UPK RF // Aktual nye problemy bor by s prestupnost yu: sb. statey. M.: NORMA, 2003. S. 86-90.
Deklaratsiya osnovnykh printsipov pravosudiya dlya zhertv prestupleniy i zloupotrebleniy vlast yu: prinyata Rezolyutsiey General noy Assambleey OON ot 29 noyabrya 1985 goda 40/34 // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1992 g. № 9-10. S. 39.
Zakon RSFSR ot 27.10.1960 g. Ob utverzhdenii ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa RSFSR (vstupil v silu s 01.01.1961 g.).
Kobets P.N., Krasnova K.A. O probleme vozmeshcheniya vreda poterpevshim na stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2009. № 4. S. 30-35.
Komarov S. A., Mal ko A. V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M.: Norma, 2004. 442 c.
Komissarov V.I. Poterpevshiy - tsentral naya figura ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 9. S. 31-33.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 N 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 N 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 N 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 N 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 04.08.2014. № 31, st. 4398.
Luneev V.V. Prestupnost XX veka. Mirovye, regional nye i rossiyskie tendentsii. M.: Izdatel stvo Norma, 1997. S. 525.
Mazyuk R. V. Institut ugolovnogo presledovaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: YUrlitinform, 2009. 216 s.
Pasternak N.A. Realizatsiya funktsii zashchity v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve po deystvuyushchemu ugolovno-protsessual nomu zakonodatel stvu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2009. № 3. S. 169 - 171.
Postanovlenie VTSIK ot 15.02.1923 goda Ob utverzhdenii Ugolovno-protsessual nogo Kodeksa RSFSR // Izvestiya VTSIK. № 37. 18.02.1923.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 235. 10.12.1998.
Savitskiy V. I. Vozmeshchenie ushcherba gosudarstvom // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1992. № 6. S. 12-14.
Skoblikov P.A. Sovremennye problemy vozmeshcheniya vreda litsam, postradavshim ot prestupleniy i zakonodatel nye resheniya // Zakon. 2012. № 8. S.87-92.
Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 23. 08. 2004. № 34, st. 3534.
Statisticheskie svedeniya GIATS MVD Rossii o sostoyanii prestupnosti za 1991 - 2014 gg.
Stroykova A.S. K voprosu o razumnosti srokov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v aspekte realizatsii prav obvinyaemogo i poterpevshego // Biznes v zakone. 2013. № 1. S. 40 - 42.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 N 174-FZ (red. ot 21.07.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 06.08.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 24. 12. 2001, № 52 (ch. I), st. 4921.
Federal nyy zakon ot 20. 08. 2004 № 119-FZ O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (red. ot 03. 02. 2014, s izm. ot 04. 06. 2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 23. 08. 2004, № 34, st. 3534.
Fomenko A.N. K voprosu o trudnostyakh realizatsii otdel nykh protsessual nykh prav poterpevshim v ugolovnom dele na dosudebnom proizvodstve // Biznes v zakone. 2011. № 6. S. 74 - 76.
Elektronnyy resurs http: // www.mvd.ru / stats / (data obrashcheniya: 18.10.2014 g.).
Elektronnyy resurs http://www.pvlast.ru/archive/ index.378.php/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.10.2014 g.).
Elektronnyy resurs http://www.oprf.ru/files/2013 dok/o rabote OPRF15052013.pdf/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.10.2014 g.).
Keywords:
legal state, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, criminal law, the criminal process, the victim.
Related Articles
Pages: 10-14 DOI: 10.33693/2782-7372-2023-2-1-10-14 Issue №22977
Features of Russia’s Criminal Policy in the Context of Digitalization of Modern Society
criminal law
criminal offenses
scientific and technological progress
cybercrime
Show more
6. CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT LAW, V.P. REVIN"S SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL Pages: 146-149 Issue №2615
A few words on the construction of the concept of modern criminal policy aimed at protecting the interests of justice
the concept
criminal policy
management decision
combating crime
justice
Show more
9. CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY; CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT LAW 12.00.08 Pages: 211-214 Issue №18348
Application of the rule on physical or mental coercion and some ways to improve the effectiveness of its implementation
physical or mental coercion
extreme necessity
force majeure
violence
coercion
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 142-144 Issue №11481
VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
significant violations of criminal-procedural law
a preliminary investigation
the criminal process
the admissibility of evidence
Show more
2. SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE, PROFESSOR ShHAGAPSOEV Z.L. Pages: 156-158 Issue №7907
Investigative actions related to the investigation of the victim
examination
a forensic examination
the victim
criminal
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 162-165 Issue №4982
ADJUSTMENT OF CRIMINAL CODE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FACTOR OF DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN CRIMINAL POLITICS
criminal policy
criminal law
transformation
reform
the concept
Show more
11. CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY; CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT LAW 12.00.08 Pages: 229-233 Issue №17214
Problems associated with improvement of legislation on criminal liability for illegal banking operations
crime
banking
prevention
prevention
legislation
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 161-164 Issue №6543
POLLING OF PERSONS BY AN ADVOCATE-DEFENDER AS MEANS OF COLLECTING EVIDENCES IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
a survey of persons with their consent
defender
the investigator
the criminal process
methods of gathering evidence
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 172-174 Issue №5584
Problems ratio of criminal and administrative policy
the concept
public safety
criminal policy
criminal law
administrative policy
Show more
6. Criminology Pages: 187-190 Issue №3132
Regulation of relations connected with the execution of orders or decrees, in the legislation of several countries in the Asia-Pacific region
Institute
execution of order or instruction
the circumstance excluding criminality of act
the Asia-Pacific region
criminal law
Show more