MEASURES OF THE STATE PROTECTION PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMINAL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE MODERN LEGISLATION OF RUSSIA
( Pp. 183-186)
More about authors
Salakhova Zhanna Valeryevna
kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: Ufimskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii. Podrazdelenie: kafedra upravleniya v organah vnutrennih del.
Ufa law institute of MIA Russia Alakhov Sergey Borisovich kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: professor. Mesto raboty: Ufimskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii. Podrazdelenie: kafedra upravleniya v organah vnutrennih del
Ufa law institute of MIA Russia
Ufa law institute of MIA Russia Alakhov Sergey Borisovich kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: professor. Mesto raboty: Ufimskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii. Podrazdelenie: kafedra upravleniya v organah vnutrennih del
Ufa law institute of MIA Russia
Abstract:
A task - questions of standard and legal regulation of measures of the state protection of the participants of criminal trial connected with need of safety of the personality for the sphere of criminal legal proceedings Are investigated. Model - the Methodological basis of work - a general dialektiko-materialistic method of knowledge of objective reality. General scientific methods - the analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction were used. By means of it is private the scientific - a legallistic method the content of the standards of the legislation regulating the analyzed problem is analysed and generalized. Conclusions - Systematization of the measures of state security which are available in various regulations, promotes rendering the effective, full-fledged and effective help to participants of criminal legal proceedings at various stages of criminal trial. A framework research/possibility of the subsequent use of results of scientific work - the Content of work supplements scientific and legal bases of institute of safety of the personality in the criminal procedure sphere; it can be used in the further researches connected with development of the analyzed problem. Practical value - Separate conclusions of work can be considered in practical activities of investigation authorities, inquiries, courts and bodies of prosecutor's office at emergence of questions of application of measures of the state protection. Originality/value - on the basis of the analysis of standards of the criminal procedure legislation, is studied institute of application of various measures of the state protection fixed both in the code of criminal procedure of the Russian Federation, and in other federal laws. It is intended for scientists, teachers who are trained in all directions of a legal profile, and also practical employees of law enforcement agencies
How to Cite:
Salakhova Z.V., Alakhov S.B., (2015), MEASURES OF THE STATE PROTECTION PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMINAL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE MODERN LEGISLATION OF RUSSIA. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 183-186.
Reference list:
Latypov V.S., Latypova N.S. Sistema printsipov obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii: materialy XXXV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, g. Novosibirsk: Izd. SibAK , 24 marta 2014 g. № 3 (35). S. 14-18.
Latypov V.S. Genezis uchastiya inykh sub ektov v otechestvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (na primere eksperta i spetsialista) // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V.N. Tatishcheva. 2013. № 2(78). S. 79-86.
Latypov V.S. Nesovershennoletnie svideteli v protsessual nom zakonodatel stve Rossii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota. 2012. № 5 (19): v 2-kh ch. CH. I. S. 107-109.
Nikolaev E.M., Matvienko I.V. Zakonnye interesy poterpevshego podlezhashchie vosstanovleniyu, v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 2. S. 164-166.
Salakhov S.B. Protsessual nyy status ponyatogo v ugolovnom protsesse // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota. 2014. № 10-1 (48). S. 139-141.
Kudina S.A., Kaats M.E., Malikova N.V. Nekotorye problemnye voprosy zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya instituta obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 2. S. 161-163.
Isaeva R.M. K voprosu bytiya tayny sledstviya v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 2. S. 242.
Talyneva Z.Z. Plyusy i minusy sushchestvovaniya doznaniya v sokrashchennoy forme // Probely v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. 2014. № 2. S. 245-247.
Talyneva Z.Z. Ispol zovanie vozmozhnostey psikhologicheskogo obespecheniya v mirovom sude po delam chastnogo obvineniya // CHernye dyry. 2014. № 5. S. 98-100.
Latypov V.S. Genezis uchastiya inykh sub ektov v otechestvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (na primere eksperta i spetsialista) // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V.N. Tatishcheva. 2013. № 2(78). S. 79-86.
Latypov V.S. Nesovershennoletnie svideteli v protsessual nom zakonodatel stve Rossii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota. 2012. № 5 (19): v 2-kh ch. CH. I. S. 107-109.
Nikolaev E.M., Matvienko I.V. Zakonnye interesy poterpevshego podlezhashchie vosstanovleniyu, v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 2. S. 164-166.
Salakhov S.B. Protsessual nyy status ponyatogo v ugolovnom protsesse // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota. 2014. № 10-1 (48). S. 139-141.
Kudina S.A., Kaats M.E., Malikova N.V. Nekotorye problemnye voprosy zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya instituta obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 2. S. 161-163.
Isaeva R.M. K voprosu bytiya tayny sledstviya v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 2. S. 242.
Talyneva Z.Z. Plyusy i minusy sushchestvovaniya doznaniya v sokrashchennoy forme // Probely v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. 2014. № 2. S. 245-247.
Talyneva Z.Z. Ispol zovanie vozmozhnostey psikhologicheskogo obespecheniya v mirovom sude po delam chastnogo obvineniya // CHernye dyry. 2014. № 5. S. 98-100.
Keywords:
the criminal process, the public defence, the security of individuals, security measures, measures of state protection.
