CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF JUDICIAL PROTECTING OF SOCIETY RUSSIAN FROM THREATS THAT ARISE IN THE RELIGIOUS SPHERE
( Pp. 19-24)
More about authors
Tarasevich Ivan Anatolievich
chtec po hirotesii, kand. yurid. nauk, docent.
Tobolsk Theological Seminary
Tobolsk Theological Seminary
Abstract:
Background: Currently, worldwide there protsess gain increasing religiosity and religious confrontation. Is therefore essential to ensure the religious security of Russia. In this process, a special place is occupied by the judiciary. The court has the ability to full and complete consideration of cases relating to the provision of religious security, and the court can fully and effectively protect the human and civil rights in this area. Therefore, of particular relevance is the study of the constitutional foundations of judicial protection of Russian society from threats that arise in the religious sphere. Methodology: Using the general scientific dialectical method, the author of the article makes the analysis of the Russian legislation in the dynamics reveals the dialectic between the potential of the judicial system to counter threats in the religious sphere and the degree of Russia's national security. Dialectic method of knowledge complement chastnonauchnogo techniques that made it possible to reveal the meaning and content of religious security threats of the Russian Federation, as well as to conduct their classification. Among the methods used chastnonauchnogo empirical methods: formal-legal analysis of the legislation and literature, the method of expert assessments, monitoring, analysis and generalization of scientific theory. Conclusions: The article concludes that the Russian legislation does not allow enough exercise judicial protection of society against all threats in the religious sphere, but with the proper adjustment of the rules of substantive and procedural law can cope with this task. The author considers the possibility of improving the regulatory framework for strengthening Russian ships religious security. Practical significance: Scientific conclusions and proposals formulated in the article may be useful for other countries that have already faced threats in the religious sphere, or are yet to be felt on all the negative aspects of this phenomenon. It is especially important for such a study of the post-Soviet space. Article primarily addressed to specialists in the field of national security community.
How to Cite:
Tarasevich I.A., (2015), CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF JUDICIAL PROTECTING OF SOCIETY RUSSIAN FROM THREATS THAT ARISE IN THE RELIGIOUS SPHERE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 19-24.
Reference list:
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2009. № 4. St. 445.
Federal nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12.07.94 № 1-FKZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1994. 23 iyulya.
Federal nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii O svobode sovesti i o religioznykh ob edineniyakh ot 26.09.1997 № 125-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1997. № 39. St. 4465.
Federal nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii O protivodeystvii ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti ot 25.07.2002 № 114-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. № 30. St. 3031.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 05.12.2012 № 30-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy punkta 5 stat i 16 Federal nogo zakona O svobode sovesti i o religioznykh ob edineniyakh i punkta 5 stat i 19 Zakona Respubliki Tatarstan O svobode sovesti i o religioznykh ob edineniyakh v svyazi s zhaloboy Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. № 51. St. 7324.
Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 26.07.2007 Delo Barankevich (Barankevich) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Byulleten Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. Rossiyskoe izdanie. 2008. № 10.
Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 01.10.2009 Delo Kimlya i drugie (Kimlya and others) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Byulleten Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. Rossiyskoe izdanie. 2010. № 4.
Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 10.06.2010 Delo Svideteli Iegovy v Moskve i drugie (Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and others) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii (zhaloba № 302/02). Po delu obzhaluetsya narushenie prava na svobodu veroispovedaniya, vyrazheniya svoego mneniya i ob edineniya. Po delu narusheny trebovaniya statey 9, 11, 14, punkta 1 stat i 6 Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod // Rossiyskaya khronika Evropeyskogo Suda . 2011. № 2.
Amirokova R.A. Politicheskiy ekstremizm v sovremennom politicheskom protsesse Rossii: avtoreferaty i dissertatsii po spetsial nosti 23.00.02 - politicheskie instituty, etnopoliticheskaya konfliktologiya, natsional nye i politicheskie protsessy i tekhnologii. CHerkessk, 2006. URL: http://www. scholar.ru/speciality.php page 36 spec id 91 (data obrashcheniya: 1.02.13).
Zabarchuk E.L. Religioznyy ekstremizm kak odna iz ugroz bezopasnosti rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 6. S. 8.
Zor kin V.D. Ob ugrozakh konstitutsionnomu stroyu v XXI veke i neobkhodimosti provedeniya pravovoy reformy v Rossii // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. № 6. S. 7.
Sultanov A.R. Zashchita svobody sovesti, rasprostraneniya ubezhdeniy cherez prizmu postanovleniy Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. M.: Statut, 2013. 544 s.
Tarasevich I.A. Religioznaya bezopasnost Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Tyumen , 2013. 288 s.
TSybulevskaya O.I. Nravstvennye osnovaniya sovremennogo rossiyskogo prava: dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. Saratov, 2004. 430 c.
SHusteva A.I. Institutsional no-pravovoe obespechenie gosudar-stvenno-konfessional noy bezopasnosti v postsovetskoy Rossii: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 23.00.02. Rostov n/D, 2008. 165 s.
Federal nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12.07.94 № 1-FKZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1994. 23 iyulya.
Federal nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii O svobode sovesti i o religioznykh ob edineniyakh ot 26.09.1997 № 125-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1997. № 39. St. 4465.
Federal nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii O protivodeystvii ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti ot 25.07.2002 № 114-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. № 30. St. 3031.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 05.12.2012 № 30-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy punkta 5 stat i 16 Federal nogo zakona O svobode sovesti i o religioznykh ob edineniyakh i punkta 5 stat i 19 Zakona Respubliki Tatarstan O svobode sovesti i o religioznykh ob edineniyakh v svyazi s zhaloboy Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. № 51. St. 7324.
Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 26.07.2007 Delo Barankevich (Barankevich) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Byulleten Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. Rossiyskoe izdanie. 2008. № 10.
Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 01.10.2009 Delo Kimlya i drugie (Kimlya and others) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Byulleten Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. Rossiyskoe izdanie. 2010. № 4.
Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 10.06.2010 Delo Svideteli Iegovy v Moskve i drugie (Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and others) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii (zhaloba № 302/02). Po delu obzhaluetsya narushenie prava na svobodu veroispovedaniya, vyrazheniya svoego mneniya i ob edineniya. Po delu narusheny trebovaniya statey 9, 11, 14, punkta 1 stat i 6 Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod // Rossiyskaya khronika Evropeyskogo Suda . 2011. № 2.
Amirokova R.A. Politicheskiy ekstremizm v sovremennom politicheskom protsesse Rossii: avtoreferaty i dissertatsii po spetsial nosti 23.00.02 - politicheskie instituty, etnopoliticheskaya konfliktologiya, natsional nye i politicheskie protsessy i tekhnologii. CHerkessk, 2006. URL: http://www. scholar.ru/speciality.php page 36 spec id 91 (data obrashcheniya: 1.02.13).
Zabarchuk E.L. Religioznyy ekstremizm kak odna iz ugroz bezopasnosti rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 6. S. 8.
Zor kin V.D. Ob ugrozakh konstitutsionnomu stroyu v XXI veke i neobkhodimosti provedeniya pravovoy reformy v Rossii // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. № 6. S. 7.
Sultanov A.R. Zashchita svobody sovesti, rasprostraneniya ubezhdeniy cherez prizmu postanovleniy Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. M.: Statut, 2013. 544 s.
Tarasevich I.A. Religioznaya bezopasnost Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Tyumen , 2013. 288 s.
TSybulevskaya O.I. Nravstvennye osnovaniya sovremennogo rossiyskogo prava: dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. Saratov, 2004. 430 c.
SHusteva A.I. Institutsional no-pravovoe obespechenie gosudar-stvenno-konfessional noy bezopasnosti v postsovetskoy Rossii: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 23.00.02. Rostov n/D, 2008. 165 s.
Keywords:
judicial protection, religious crime, religious security, religious extremism, proselytism.