The issue of state’s monopoly on the use of violence
( Pp. 71-75)

The article analyzes the approaches to the problem of the state's monopoly on the use of violence. The trend for weakening of the state-nation as the major subject of ensuring security in connection with globalization and partial delegation of the right to use armed force to non-state actors are picked out. The need to return to the concept of the «strong state» because of lack of efficacy of «weak states» in the fight against contemporary security threats, including international terrorism, is also explained. The issues of the involvement of armed forces to ensure internal security of the state are considered. Purpose - consideration of the role of violence in the process of forming state and its monopoly on the use of violence as a condition of ensuring security of the individual, society and state. Methodology - analysis of different approaches to the assessment of the state's monopoly on the use of violence in the process of its genesis. Results - «minimal», «weak» state is unable to effectively counteract contemporary security threats (in particular, international terrorism); delegation of the right to use armed violence to non-state actors poses threats to the international and national security; the concept of the «strong state» is necessary condition for ensuring internal and external security of the Russian Federation. Originality / value - The article explains the need to strengthen the role of the state as the main subject of ensuring security and conservation of its monopoly on the use of violence in the modern world.

Amirov R.Z., (2015), THE ISSUE OF STATE’S MONOPOLY ON THE USE OF VIOLENCE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 71-75.

Antologiya sotsial no-politicheskoy mysli. V 2 t. T. 1. M., 2001.
Baluev D. G. Lichnostnaya i gosudarstvennaya bzopasnost : sovremennoe mezhdunarodno-politicheskoe izmerenie : dis. dokt. polit. nauk. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2004.
Vitte S. YU. Vospominaniya. V 3 t. T. 3. TSarstvovanie Nikolaya II. Tallinn; M., 1994.
Gobbs. T. Leviafan ili materiya, forma i vlast gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo // Gobbs T. Soch. v 2 t. T. 2. M., 1991.
Gessen V. M. Iz lektsiy po politseyskomu pravu, chitannykh v 1901-1902 uchebnom godu v Aleksandrovskoy voenno-yuridicheskoy akademii. SPb., 1902.
Grotsiy G. O prave voyny i mira. Tri knigi, v kotorykh ob yasnyayutsya estestvennoe pravo i pravo narodov, a takzhe printsipy publichnogo prava. M., 1957.
Zalysin I.YU. Ponyatie politicheskoe nasilie v politologii i ugolovnom prave // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 1. S. 166-169.
Kashanina T. V. Proiskhozhdenie gosudarstva i prava. Sovremennye traktovki i novye podkhody: Uchebnoe posobie. M., 1999.
Latypova N.S. Vliyanie grazhdanskoy voyny v SSHA (1861-1865 gg.) na formirovanie amerikanskoy gosudarstvennosti // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 3 (33). S. 106-109.
Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 39. S. 73.
Makiavelli N. Gosudar . Rassuzhdeniya o pervoy dekade Tita Liviya. O voennom iskusstve. M., 1994.
Marks K., Engel s F. Sochineniya. 2-e izd. T. 20. M., 1961.
Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Federal nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 4 dekabrya 2014 goda. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/news/47173 (data obrashcheniya: 05.12.2014).
Stolypin P. A. Nam nuzhna velikaya Rossiya. Polnoe sobranie rechey v Gosudarstvennoy dume i Gosudarstvennom sovete. M., 1991.
Sokolova R. I., Spiridonova V. I. Gosudarstvo v sovremennom mire. M., 2003.
Toffler E. Metamorfozy vlasti. M, 2009.
Petrenko M.N. O nasilii i prinuzhdenii vo vlastnoy deyatel nosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. № 4. S. 178-181.
Kotel nikova E.A. O zakonodatel noy reglamentatsii ponyatiya nasilie // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2008. № 1. S. 228.
Amirov R.Z.Nekotorye voprosy obespecheniya vnutrenney bezopasnosti v kontekste razvitiya voennoy doktriny Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2010. № 4. S.73-76.

the monopoly on violence, the legitimate use of force, security of the person, armed forces, private military companies, the security of the state, security companies.