PROBLEMS OF CONTENT OF ACTIVITIES OF THE STATE-WALL PROSECUTOR WHEN CONSIDERING A CRIMINAL CASE IN SPECIAL ORDER
( Pp. 182-185)
More about authors
Turilov Georgy Georgievich
kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa.
Kuban state University
Kuban state University
Abstract:
One of the main necessities of modern time is to bring the procedure for considering criminal cases to its classical form, where there is a knowledge of the circumstances of the case by the parties, with the active role of the public prosecutor. Today, this is not the case. Most cases are considered in an abbreviated manner, which leaves an imprint on the content of the activities of all participants in the proceedings. A rather serious problem is the correct designation of the content of the activities of the public prosecutor: is it evidence-based, in fact. As a result of a comprehensive study of this issue, the author formulates his own conclusion and suggests ways to solve the problem.
How to Cite:
Turilov G.G., (2020), PROBLEMS OF CONTENT OF ACTIVITIES OF THE STATE-WALL PROSECUTOR WHEN CONSIDERING A CRIMINAL CASE IN SPECIAL ORDER. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 182-185.
Reference list:
Bulygin A.V. Spetsifika dokazyvaniya pri osobom poryadke sudebnogo razbiratel stva // Sovremennoe pravo. - 2012. - S. 124-127.
Kachalova O.V. Realizatsiya printsipov ugolovno-protsessual nogo prava pri uskorennykh proizvodstvakh // Lex Russia. - 2015. - №11. - S. 65-74.
Brester A.A. Ob oshibochnom otnesenii osobogo poryadka prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya k ugolovno-protsessual noy deyatel nosti // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2015. - №12. - S.140-146.
SHaginyan A.S., Skoblik K.V. Ugolovnyy protsess: optimizatsiya ili neopravdannoe uproshchenie // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2015. - №12. - S.107-115.
Agaev Z.R. Pravovoe polozhenie prokurora pri osobom poryadke sudebnogo razbiratel stva v Rossii // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2010 (14). - S. 296-305.
Tugutov B.A., Kalmykov A.S. Funktsii prokurora pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v osobom poryadke // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2015. - №2. - S. 324 - 326.
Prigovor po delu ob obvinenii Movsesyana E.E. v sovershenii prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo ch.2 st.228 UK RF № 1-492/2012 ot 30 avgusta 2012 g. po delu № 1-492/2012 // Arkhiv Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda g. Krasnodara.
Krasnov podderzhal ideyu rezhe primenyat osobyy poryadok rassmotreniya del // https://ria.ru/20200122/ 1563716967.html
Kachalova O.V. Realizatsiya printsipov ugolovno-protsessual nogo prava pri uskorennykh proizvodstvakh // Lex Russia. - 2015. - №11. - S. 65-74.
Brester A.A. Ob oshibochnom otnesenii osobogo poryadka prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya k ugolovno-protsessual noy deyatel nosti // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2015. - №12. - S.140-146.
SHaginyan A.S., Skoblik K.V. Ugolovnyy protsess: optimizatsiya ili neopravdannoe uproshchenie // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2015. - №12. - S.107-115.
Agaev Z.R. Pravovoe polozhenie prokurora pri osobom poryadke sudebnogo razbiratel stva v Rossii // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2010 (14). - S. 296-305.
Tugutov B.A., Kalmykov A.S. Funktsii prokurora pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v osobom poryadke // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2015. - №2. - S. 324 - 326.
Prigovor po delu ob obvinenii Movsesyana E.E. v sovershenii prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo ch.2 st.228 UK RF № 1-492/2012 ot 30 avgusta 2012 g. po delu № 1-492/2012 // Arkhiv Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda g. Krasnodara.
Krasnov podderzhal ideyu rezhe primenyat osobyy poryadok rassmotreniya del // https://ria.ru/20200122/ 1563716967.html
Keywords:
public prosecutor, prosecutor, proving, cognition, procedure, nature of activity.
