Social-legal suppositions of court fine implementation in Russian criminal law
( Pp. 145-147)

More about authors
Mikhaylov Dmitriy Olegovich Dolzhnost: sudya. Dolzhnost: prepodavatel. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava
Zheleznodorozhniy district court city of Simferopol; Russian academy of justice. Branch: Crimean branch
Abstract:
Urgency of an issue and research goal. This article is dedicated to analysis of problems of historical-legal suppositions of court fine implementation in Russian criminal law. The urgency of this issue is predetermined by importance of developing optimal legislative constructions of court fine institution. Methodological basis of performed work is formed by dialectical principles of research, systemic, comparative-legal and other scientific methods. General results of research. We currently see positive tendency to widen criminal liability disclaimer list and other measures of criminal law character. And though respective institutions are highly criticized in scientific literature, the designated vector of criminal politics has our positive evaluation. Though there is a positive dynamics for criminal legislation liberalization, common critical reviews in legal literature make us think that the process of law making in a part of institutions under study cannot be called consistent, what, obviously, predetermines the need of their more strict systematization and structuring. Ignoring of systemic-structural principles of legislation process draws the perspectives of corresponding norms entropy, which, in its turn, tells us about the strive of legislator to improve statistics due to political reasons, not about elaborate strategy to improve criminal law institutions under study. Scientifically-practical importance of this work is in possibility to imply respective conclusions when forming national criminal politics; for later scientific researches in the sphere under study; for studying the course of criminal law in universities and colleges. This article is intended for postgraduates, bachelors, students, practitioners and to everybody, who is interested in the topic under study.
How to Cite:
Mikhaylov D.O., (2018), SOCIAL-LEGAL SUPPOSITIONS OF COURT FINE IMPLEMENTATION IN RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 145-147.
Reference list:
Anoshchenkova S.V. Naznachenie sudebnogo shtrafa: voprosy teorii i praktiki // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2017. N 7. S. 114-125.
Punkt i chasti 1 stat i 61, chast 1 stat i 62, stat i 76, 76.1, chast 2 stat i 74, stat ya 76.2, chast 1 stat i 79, chast 1 stat i 80, chast 5 stat i 86, punkt v chasti 2 stat i 90 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ. (red. ot 12.11.2018) // SPS quot;Konsul tantPlyus quot;.
Stat i 76.1, 76.2 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ. (red. ot 12.11.2018) // SPS quot;Konsul tantPlyus quot;.
Golovinskaya I.V. Sudebnyy shtraf kak osnovanie osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Sovremennyy yurist. 2016. № 4. S. 103-114.
Krylova N. E. Gumanizatsiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva prodolzhaetsya Analiz proektov federal nykh zakonov, odobrennykh Plenumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 31 iyulya 2015 g. // Zakon. 2015. № 8. S. 100.
Knyaz kov A. A. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: pravovaya priroda i optimal nye napravleniya modernizatsii // YUridicheskaya nauka. 2015. № 4. S. 92-97.
Poyasnitel naya zapiska k proektu Federal nogo zakona quot;O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya osnovaniy i poryadka osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti quot; // SPS quot;Konsul tantPlyus quot;.