Some questions of exemption from criminal liability in connection with positive post-criminal behavior
( Pp. 142-148)
More about authors
Andrianov Vladimir Konstantinovich
Cand.Sci.(Law), senior researcher at the Center for justice research
Russian State University of Justice
Moscow, Russia
Russian State University of Justice
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
The specific types of positive post-criminal behavior have a specific content, many aspects of which are discussed in the literature and ambiguously understood in legal practice. The proposed publication based on the analysis of the legal position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation contains a number of specific recommendations on the criminal law assessment of surrender, facilitate the disclosure and investigation of crimes, compensation and reparation as a reason to exemption from criminal liability.
How to Cite:
Andrianov V.K., (2020), SOME QUESTIONS OF EXEMPTION FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH POSITIVE POST-CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 142-148.
Reference list:
Avsenitskaya K.V. Deyatel noe raskayanie: ponyatie, formy vyrazheniya, stimulirovanie ugolovno-pravovymi merami. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M.,2014.
Antonov A. G. Deyatel noe raskayanie kak osnovanie osvobozhdeniya ot nakazaniya: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2000.
Blagov E.V. Ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v svyazi s deyatel nym raskayaniem // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2017. №7 (80).
Brilliantov A.V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s uchetom obobshcheniya sudebnoy praktiki: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.,2015.
Golovko L. V. Al ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu v sovremennom prave. SPb., 2002.
ZHarikov YU. YAvka s povinnoy kak obstoyatel stvo, smyagchayushchee nakazanie osuzhdennogo // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. №5.
Naumov A.V. Praktika primeneniya Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki i doktrinal noe tolkovanie / Pod red. G.M. Reznika. M.,2005.
Sabitov R.A. Teoriya ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya povedeniya litsa posle soversheniya im prestupleniya i vyneseniya emu prigovora. M.,2013.
Sverchkov V.V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti, prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela (presledovaniya), otkaz v ego vozbuzhdenii: problemy teorii i praktiki. SPb.,2008.
Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T. 10. S. 297.
Antonov A. G. Deyatel noe raskayanie kak osnovanie osvobozhdeniya ot nakazaniya: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2000.
Blagov E.V. Ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v svyazi s deyatel nym raskayaniem // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2017. №7 (80).
Brilliantov A.V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s uchetom obobshcheniya sudebnoy praktiki: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.,2015.
Golovko L. V. Al ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu v sovremennom prave. SPb., 2002.
ZHarikov YU. YAvka s povinnoy kak obstoyatel stvo, smyagchayushchee nakazanie osuzhdennogo // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. №5.
Naumov A.V. Praktika primeneniya Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki i doktrinal noe tolkovanie / Pod red. G.M. Reznika. M.,2005.
Sabitov R.A. Teoriya ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya povedeniya litsa posle soversheniya im prestupleniya i vyneseniya emu prigovora. M.,2013.
Sverchkov V.V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti, prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela (presledovaniya), otkaz v ego vozbuzhdenii: problemy teorii i praktiki. SPb.,2008.
Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T. 10. S. 297.
Keywords:
positive post-criminal behavior, exemption from criminal liability, criminal law compromise, surrender, facilitating detection and investigation of crime, redress and reparation.
