Public and private interest’s consistence as a principle of federal executive bodies activity
( Pp. 284-287)

More about authors
Ermakov Anton Olegovich aspirant. Podrazdelenie: Institut prava i nacionalnoy bezopasnosti, yuridicheskiy fakultet im. M.M. Speranskogo, kafedra administrativnogo i informacionnogo prava
Russian academy of national economy and public administration under the President of Russian Federation
Abstract:
Problem. The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that while being representatives of public interests in various spheres of economy, health and security, executive bodies do not take into account that these areas are also covered by the interests of individuals. Based on provisions of the law and the positions of scientists, the author shows that such a relationship leads to the strengthening of executive authority’s role and limits private initiative. Conclusions and proposals. As an alternative, the author considers an approach involving the coordination of public and private interests in the activities of the executive authorities, concludes that the positive institutions of administrative law contribute such an implementation and proposes to consolidate this approach as one of the functional principles of the Executive. The novelty of the work is that the positive institutions of administrative law were not previously considered from these positions.
How to Cite:
Ermakov A.O., (2019), PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTEREST’S CONSISTENCE AS A PRINCIPLE OF FEDERAL EXECUTIVE BODIES ACTIVITY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 284-287.
Reference list:
Agapov A.B. Publichnye protsedury gosudarstvennoy registratsii // Lex russica. 2019. № 1. S. 40 - 50.
Alekseev S.S. Izbrannoe. M., 2003.
Vasilenkov P.T. Pravovye osnovy upravleniya otraslyami narodnogo khozyaystva (uchebnoe posobie). M., 1986.
Krokhina YU.A. Zashchita prav sub ektov v nalogovykh sporakh: poisk balansa chastnykh i publichnykh interesov // Uchen. tr. Ros. akad. advokatury i notariata. 2016. № 4 (43).
Luparev E.B. Obshchaya teoriya administrativno-pravovogo spora. Voronezh, 2003.
Lomaev A.YU. Publichnyy interes kak pravovaya kategoriya: Avtoref. dis. . kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan , 2012.
Osintsev D.V., Domchenko A.S. Nekotorye itogi novogo etapa administrativnoy reformy: vyvody i voprosy // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2019. № 1. S. 6 - 10.
Ostrovskaya A.S. Registratsionnyy uchet po mestu prebyvaniya i mestu zhitel stva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: poisk putey reformirovaniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2018. № 4.
Pavlovskiy R.S. Administrativnoe pravo i gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v SSSR (Tekst lektsiy). KHar kov, 1984.
Subochev V.V. Zakonnye interesy / pod red. A.V. Mal ko. M.: NORMA, 2008.
Tot ev K.YU. Publichnyy interes v pravovoy doktrine i zakonodatel stve // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 9.
Tikhomirov YU.A. Publichnoe pravo. Uchebnik. M.: BEK, 1995.
Umanskaya V.P. Balans publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v administrativnom prave // Vlast Zakona. 2017. № 1.