Features of the Use of Astrent as a Way to Protect the Rights of the Creditors
( Pp. 89-96)
More about authors
Kudryavtseva Olga Vladimirovna
Cand.Sci.(Law), Lecturer of the Administrative and Information Law Department of the Institute of Law and National Security
Russian Academy of National Economy and public service under the President of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russia
Russian Academy of National Economy and public service under the President of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
This article analyzes the legal nature of the astrent or court penalty. Based on the study of judicial practice, Russian and foreign doctrine, the problems that arise when appointing an astrent in relation to debtors who do not voluntarily execute court decisions are studied. The article provides a detailed list of categories of cases in which a court penalty can be collected. The cases of ambiguous judicial practice, including cases of recovery of astrent in administrative disputes, are investigated. Based on judicial practice, the amount of astrent collected in different categories of cases is analyzed in detail. Based on the results of the article, a conclusion was made about the high efficiency of astrent as a way to protect the rights of the creditor.
How to Cite:
Kudryavtseva O.V., (2022), FEATURES OF THE USE OF ASTRENT AS A WAY TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THE CREDITORS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 89-96.
Reference list:
Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 340 of 03.08.2018 "On Amendments to the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation and Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation" // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of March 24, 2016 No. 7 "On the application by courts of Certain Provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on liability for breach of obligations" // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation No. 22 dated April 04, 2015 "On some issues of awarding money to the recoverer for non-execution of a judicial act" // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 26, 2019 No. 307-ES17-18920 in case No. A56-49742/2016 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated April 13, 2021 No. 309-ES19-22790 in case No. A07-32699/2018 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 07/24/2020 No. 308-ES20-7162 in case N A53-462/2019 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the North-Western District of May 20, 2019 No. F07-4204/2019 in case No. A56-49742/2016 // SPS "GarantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatka District of December 26, 2016 No. F01-5561/2016 in case No. A43-33560/2015 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the North-Western District of 21.07.2017 N F07-5887/2017 in the case N A56-42494/2016 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Central District of 25.08.2017 N F10-3237/2017 in the case N A08-5742/2016 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatka district dated 26.12.2016 N F01-5561/2016 in the case N A43-33560/2015 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the North-Western District of 12.12.2016 in the case N A66-7083/2011 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga District of 19.01.2018 N F06-27678/2017 in the case N A65-123/2017 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated 10/22/2019 No. 10AP-19461/2019 in case No. A41-45620/2018 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal of 23.03.2020 N 10AP-245/2020 in the case N A41-76543/2019 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Ural District dated February 19, 2018 No. F09-7607/2017 in case No. A60-7870/2015 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Seventeenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated March 04, 2020 No. 17AP-1624/2020 in case A60-23917/2019 // SPS "Consultant".
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Central District of August 25, 2017 in the case N A08-5742/2016 // SPS "Garant".
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Sverdlovsk region of August 6, 2018 in the case N A60-21963/2018 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Republic of Tatarstan dated April 12, 2015 in the case N A65-29780/2014 // URL: https://clck.ru/32crbz (date. mod. 09.11.2022).
Braginsky M. I., Vitryansky V. V. Contract law. Book one: General provisions: ed. 2nd, ispr. M.: "Statute", 2000. Vol. 1. p. 422.
Godeme E. General theory of obligations / trans. from French. edited by I. B. Novitsky. M. 1948. 511 p.
Novitsky I. B., Peretersky I. S. Roman private law - Moscow: Knorus, 2016. 464 p.
Sergun A. K. Enforcement of court decisions in the general process of implementing the norms of law: Theoretical issues of the implementation of the norms of law // Works: Theoretical issues of the implementation of the norms of law. Proceedings of VUZI. - M.: RIO VUZI, 1978, Vol. 61. - pp. 70-148.
Ferrari F., Bocharova N. The astreinte in the Italian and Russian Administrative (Judicial) and Civil Proceedings // Russian Law Journal. 2015. № 3. pp. 9-45.
Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of March 24, 2016 No. 7 "On the application by courts of Certain Provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on liability for breach of obligations" // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation No. 22 dated April 04, 2015 "On some issues of awarding money to the recoverer for non-execution of a judicial act" // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 26, 2019 No. 307-ES17-18920 in case No. A56-49742/2016 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated April 13, 2021 No. 309-ES19-22790 in case No. A07-32699/2018 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 07/24/2020 No. 308-ES20-7162 in case N A53-462/2019 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the North-Western District of May 20, 2019 No. F07-4204/2019 in case No. A56-49742/2016 // SPS "GarantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatka District of December 26, 2016 No. F01-5561/2016 in case No. A43-33560/2015 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the North-Western District of 21.07.2017 N F07-5887/2017 in the case N A56-42494/2016 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Central District of 25.08.2017 N F10-3237/2017 in the case N A08-5742/2016 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatka district dated 26.12.2016 N F01-5561/2016 in the case N A43-33560/2015 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the North-Western District of 12.12.2016 in the case N A66-7083/2011 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga District of 19.01.2018 N F06-27678/2017 in the case N A65-123/2017 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated 10/22/2019 No. 10AP-19461/2019 in case No. A41-45620/2018 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal of 23.03.2020 N 10AP-245/2020 in the case N A41-76543/2019 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Ural District dated February 19, 2018 No. F09-7607/2017 in case No. A60-7870/2015 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Seventeenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated March 04, 2020 No. 17AP-1624/2020 in case A60-23917/2019 // SPS "Consultant".
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Central District of August 25, 2017 in the case N A08-5742/2016 // SPS "Garant".
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Sverdlovsk region of August 6, 2018 in the case N A60-21963/2018 // SPS "ConsultantPlus".
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Republic of Tatarstan dated April 12, 2015 in the case N A65-29780/2014 // URL: https://clck.ru/32crbz (date. mod. 09.11.2022).
Braginsky M. I., Vitryansky V. V. Contract law. Book one: General provisions: ed. 2nd, ispr. M.: "Statute", 2000. Vol. 1. p. 422.
Godeme E. General theory of obligations / trans. from French. edited by I. B. Novitsky. M. 1948. 511 p.
Novitsky I. B., Peretersky I. S. Roman private law - Moscow: Knorus, 2016. 464 p.
Sergun A. K. Enforcement of court decisions in the general process of implementing the norms of law: Theoretical issues of the implementation of the norms of law // Works: Theoretical issues of the implementation of the norms of law. Proceedings of VUZI. - M.: RIO VUZI, 1978, Vol. 61. - pp. 70-148.
Ferrari F., Bocharova N. The astreinte in the Italian and Russian Administrative (Judicial) and Civil Proceedings // Russian Law Journal. 2015. № 3. pp. 9-45.
Keywords:
astrent, court penalty, ways to protect the creditor's rights.
Related Articles
Private Law (Civil) Pages: 103-106 Issue №95409
Separate Issues of the Correlation of the Legal Nature of the Penalty and the Judicial Penalty
judicial penalty
astrent
obligations
execution of judicial acts
civil law.
Show more
