Circumstances affecting the choice of advocate interrogation of the witness during the trial
( Pp. 66-68)

More about authors
Kalinkina Lyubov Danilovna Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Honorary Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Mordovia, Head of the Criminal Procedure, Justice and prosecutorial supervision Department, Law institute
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article describes the techniques used by the defense lawyer during the interrogation during the judicial investigation. The author reveals what circumstances influence the choice of attorney’s lawyer’s tactics, draws attention to the specifics of the interrogation tactics when there are contradictions in the testimony, when giving evidence in the form of general phrases and formulations. The article presents recommendations to the defense lawyer in preparation for the interrogation of a witness during a court investigation, taking into account the behavior of the presiding judge in a court hearing in relation to the parties and the defense.
How to Cite:
Kalinkina L.D., (2018), CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING THE CHOICE OF ADVOCATE INTERROGATION OF THE WITNESS DURING THE TRIAL. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 66-68.
Reference list:
Sm.: Sergeich P. Iskusstvo rechi na sude. Tula: Avtograf, 2000. S. 153.
http://be5.biz/pravo/k022/20.html.
Sm.: Ugolovnoe delo № 1-24/2018 // Arkhiv Atyashevskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2018.
Dannye polucheny v khode neposredstvennogo nablyudeniya za sudebnym zasedaniem po ugolovnomu delu №2-1/2016 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2018.
Kalinkina L.D. KHodataystva, zayavleniya, zhaloby kak sposoby protivodeystviya advokata-zashchitnika proizvolu sud i v khode sudebnogo razbiratel stva v sude pervoy instantsii // Advokatskaya praktika. 2011. №4. S.25.
Sm.: Kalinkina L.D., Sotkova V.V. Vozrazheniya advokata-zashchitnika - forma protesta na deystviya predsedatel stvuyushchego v sudebnom zasedanii s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley // Evraziyskaya advokatura. 2017. №5 (30). S.60-65.
Sm.: Kalinkina L.D. O dvukh svidetelyakh v odnom litse v sude s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. №4. S.213-215.
Dannye polucheny v khode neposredstvennogo nablyudeniya za sudebnym zasedaniem po ugolovnomu delu №2-1/2016 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2018.