Circumstances excluding criminal liability for crimes committed by officials and problems of their legal regulation
( Pp. 204-210)

In the article, the author attempts to create a theoretical framework through which it is possible to build a clear and demanded law enforcement system of circumstances that cause the exclusion of criminal liability of officials who committed them, allowing a comprehensive and deep disclosure of the very content of criminal law prohibitions, as well as to assess the adequacy of each of them individually, and their entire set as a whole. The results of the research are presented by the author as legally significant conclusions, as well as the development of author's practical proposals, which are formed in the form of draft articles on amendments and additions to the criminal code of the Russian Federation. The modernization of the current criminal law of the Russian Federation in the fight against official crimes is predetermined by its obvious inefficiency. The criminal law as a whole needs to be improved, requiring, among other things, scientific developments. Analyzing works by such well-known and respected authors like A. P. Dmitrenko, D. A. Dorogan, Yu. V. Baulin, A. A. Aryamov, N. N. Engibaryan, N. And. Ipatov, J. M. Ishmukhametov, K. V. Romanov, E. G. Semenov, K. O. Culturalia, Y. D. Ivanov, the author proposes to formulate their own definition of the circumstances excluding crime of act; defining the specificity of officials offers to isolate their system. The author pays special attention to law enforcement activities in this area. The scientific novelty is also determined by the fact that this work is one of the first studies conducted with the legislative initiatives of deputies of the State Duma and the Ministry of justice, put forward in 2019 on the problems of optimizing the current system of norms of the criminal code of the Russian Federation in terms of combating official abuse of power.

Karpova E.A., (2020), CIRCUMSTANCES EXCLUDING CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR CRIMES COMMITTED BY OFFICIALS AND PROBLEMS OF THEIR LEGAL REGULATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 204-210.

Dmitrenko A.P. Obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie prestupnost deyaniya, v ugolovnom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Monografiya. M.: Ileksa, 2010.
Ipatov N.A. Obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost za prestupleniya, sovershaemye dolzhnostnymi litsami // Sovremennye problemy bor by s prestupnost yu: perspektivy i puti resheniya. Materialy Vserossiyskoy (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh. 2018. S. 83-86.
CHeltugasheva K.O. Aktual nye voprosy obstoyatel stv, isklyuchayushchikh prestupnost deyaniya // Sovremennye problemy bor by s prestupnost yu: perspektivy i puti resheniya. Materialy Vserossiyskoy (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh. 2018. S. 208-210.
Dorogin D.A. Obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost . Pravovye pozitsii sudebnykh organov: monografiya. Moskva: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet pravosudiya, 2017.
Sitnikova A.I. Doktrinal nye modeli i zakonodatel nye konstruktsii instituta obstoyatel stv, isklyuchayushchikh prestupnost deyaniya: monografiya. Oryel, 2009.
Ishmukhametov YA.M., Romanova K.V., Semenova E.G. Obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost za prestupleniya, sovershaemye dolzhnostnymi litsami // Alleya nauki. 2018. T. 3. № 10 (26). S. 402-405.
Prigovor Kozel skogo rayonnogo suda (Kaluzhskaya oblast ) ot 3 iyunya 2019 g. po delu № 1-3-8/2019. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o zloupotreblenii dolzhnostnymi polnomochiyami i o prevyshenii dolzhnostnykh polnomochiy: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 16.10.2009 № 19. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru.
Ivanova YU.D. K voprosu o ponyatii i sushchnosti obstoyatel stv, isklyuchayushchikh prestupnost deyaniya // Teoreticheskie aspekty yurisprudentsii i voprosy pravoprimeneniya. Sbornik statey po materialam XXXI mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Moskva, 2020. S. 140-144.
Lifanova M.V., YAkhina N.D. Obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost za prestupleniya, sovershaemye dolzhnostnymi litsami // Proryvnye nauchnye issledovaniya: problemy, zakonomernosti, perspektivy. Sbornik statey IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. V 4-kh chastyakh. 2017. S. 117-119
Leyba I.P., Medvedev S.S. Obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost za prestupleniya, sovershaemye dolzhnostnymi litsami // Epomen. 2019. № 27. S. 184-190.
Dukhovnik YU.E. Ugolovno-pravovaya otsenka deyaniy pri mnimom ispolnenii prikaza ili rasporyazheniya // Bor ba s prestupnost yu: teoriya i praktika Tezisy dokladov VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 2019. S. 32-34.
Nikitin A.YU., Amiyants K.A. Ispolnenie prikaza ili rasporyazheniya v ugolovnom prave Rossii // Innovatsionnye mekhanizmy resheniya problem nauchnogo razvitiya. Sbornik statey po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 2018. S. 154.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 9 iyulya 2018 g. po delu № 22-4724/17. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc.
Barygina A.A. K voprosu o nedopustimosti dokazatel stv, poluchennykh putem provokatsii litsa na sovershenie prestupleniya // Vestnik YUzhno-Ural skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2019. T. 19. № 3. S. 5-9.
O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v chasti sovershenstvovaniya mer otvetstvennosti za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya: Proekt Federal nogo zakona № 01/05/01-19/00087984 ot 25 yanvarya 2019 g. URL: https://regulation.gov.ru/projects npa 87984.

circumstances excluding criminal responsibility, special subject of crime, official, imperfection of legislative structures, optimization, modernization.