PRIVATE LAWSUITS IN THE UNITED STATES AS A WAY TO PROTECT PARTICIPANTS IN CIVIL LAW TRANSACTIONS FROM VIOLATIONS OF ANTITRUST LAWS
( Pp. 47-51)

More about authors
Artemieva Yuliya A. kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, docent, docent kafedry grazhdanskogo prava i processa i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Creating an effective market economy requires a systematic approach, including the creation of conditions for the proper development of competition. Experience shows that the use of only administrative methods to counter violations of antitrust laws is not enough. Russian lawyers have repeatedly pointed out the need for the development of private legal methods to combat anti-competitive acts. Over the past few years, the antimonopoly authorities of the Russian Federation have been actively involved in the creation of methods that allow the use of such methods to be expanded in Russia. The article proposes a study of the legislative experience of the United States that have accumulated significant experience in this field. Currently, more than 90 percent of antitrust lawsuits are filed by consumers. [1; 4] The author explores the rights of individuals to file claims for damages caused by violations of antitrust laws, the rights of persons of indirect counterparties, types of claims.
How to Cite:
Artemieva Y.A., (2019), PRIVATE LAWSUITS IN THE UNITED STATES AS A WAY TO PROTECT PARTICIPANTS IN CIVIL LAW TRANSACTIONS FROM VIOLATIONS OF ANTITRUST LAWS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 47-51.
Reference list:
The International Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law / Ed. by Foer A.A. and Cuneo J.W. Cheltenhem: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2012, P. 4
Dudin M., Sertakova O., Frolova E., Artemieva Y, Galkina M. Development of methodological approaches to assessing the quality of healthcare services. // QUALITY-Access to Success, June 2017. Vol. 18, Nr. 158. r.71-79. ISSN15822559-Romania-Scopus.
Dudin M.N., Frolova E.E., Kovalev S.I., Ermakova E.P., Kirsanov A.N. (2017) Migration Processes In The Context Of Political Collisions: Factors And Social And Economic Consequences // Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2017. T. 12. №1 (47). S. 85-94. ISSN 18436110
Dudin M.N., Frolova E.E., Protopopova O.V., Artemieva Ju.A., Abashidze A.H. (2016) Latin America And Russia On The Course Of Mutual Contingence Under Conditions Of Global Economic Crisis // International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research. 2016. T. 14. № 15. S. 11161-11170. ISSN : 0972-7302
Dudin M.N., Ivashchenko N.P., Frolova E.E., Abashidze A.H. (2017) Institutional Approach to Establishment of a Structural Model of the Russian Academic Environment Development// European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2017. T. 6. № 1. S. 22-38. E-ISSN: 2305-6746.
Hovenkamp H. Federal Antitrust Policy. The Law of Competition and its Practice. // West. 4th ed. 2011. 906 p.
Kolasky W. Antitrust litigation: what s changed in twenty-five years // Antitrust. 2012. Vol. 27. № 1.
Areeda R. Antitrust Violations without Damage Recoveries.// Harvard Law Review. Vol. 89, No. 6 (Apr., 1976), pp. 1127-1139
Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330 (1979). Elektron. resurs // URL: https://law.resource.org/pub/ us/case/reporter/US/442/442.US.330.78-690.html/ data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co., 183 F. 704 (3d Cir. 1910). Elektron. resurs // URL: https://casetext.com/ case/loeb-v-eastman-kodak page 709/ data obrashcheniya: 02.05.19).
Conference of Studio Unions v. Lowe s Inc., 198 F.2d 51 (9th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 367 (1952). Elektron. resurs // URL: http://openjurist.org/193/f2d/51/conference-of-studio-unions-v-loews-inc/ data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
Hovenkamp H. Black Letter Outline on Antitrust (Black Letter Outlines). // West. 5th ed. 2011. 464 p.
Jones A., Sufrin B. EC Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. // Oxford University Press. 2014. 1331 r.
Illinois Brick Co. v Illinois., 431 U.S. 720 (1977). Elektron. resurs // URL: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/431/720.html/ data obr.: 02.05.2019).
A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Cost-Pius Contract Exception in Hanover Shoe and Illinois Brick, 47 U.Chi.L.Rev. 743 (1980). URL: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/1599341 seq 1 page scan tab contents (data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
Arizona v. Shamrock Foods Co., 729 F.2d 1208 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1197 (1985). Elektron. resurs // URL: http://openjurist.org/729/f2d/1208/state-of-arizona-v-shamrock-foods-company-j-alton/ data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
Lawiter D.C., Zschocke Ch.O., Rich J.M. Class Action Litigation In The United States: Antitrust Litigation As A Case Study. // URL: https://www.morganlewis.com/ pubs/01B7AE21-A921-4892-96CF8E0EC68E46CE Publication.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
Foer A.A., Cuneo J.W. Cheltenhem// Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2012, P. 4. ISBN-13: 978-1781005286.
Bronsteen J. Class Action Settlements: An Opt-In Proposal. // URL: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/view-content.agi article 1209 context facpubs ( data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019). P. 907
Sherman Antitrust Act (Sherman Act), 1890. Elektron. resurs // URL: http://www.civics-online.org/lib-rary/format-ted/texts/sherman antitrust.html / data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
Clayton Antitrust Act, 1914. Elektron. resurs // URL: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/ clayton-antitrust-act/
Class Action Fairness Act. 2005. Elektron. resurs // URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ2/pdf/ PLAW-109publ2.pdf/ data obr.: 02.05.2019).
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Elektron. resurs // URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/ data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
Federal Trade Commission Act. Elektron. resurs // URL: http://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/statutes/federal-trade-commission-act data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
1982 Merger Guidelines. Elektron. resurs // URL: http://www.justice.gov/atr/hmerger/11248.htm/ data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).
Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004. (ACPERA) // https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/ Public Law 108-237/Title II data obr.: 02.05.2019).
Class Action Fairness Act 2005g. https://www.cong-ress.gov/109/plaws/publ2/PLAW-109publ2.pdf data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2019).