Problems of Evidentiary Significance of Some Types of Forensic Examinations
( Pp. 276-280)
More about authors
Kocumbas Sergey M.
kand. yurid. nauk, zamestitel predsedatelya Belgorodskogo oblastnogo suda, docent kafedry sudebnoy ekspertizy i kriminalistiki
Belgorod National Research University; Belgorod Regional Court
Belgorod, Russia Lyakhova Dar’ya A. pomoschnik zamestitelya predsedatelya
Belgorod Regional Court
Belgorod, Russia
Belgorod National Research University; Belgorod Regional Court
Belgorod, Russia Lyakhova Dar’ya A. pomoschnik zamestitelya predsedatelya
Belgorod Regional Court
Belgorod, Russia
Abstract:
The paper discusses problematic issues related to the use of the results of rare types of expert research in evidentiary activities, provides reasoned positions on this matter of practicing lawyers and domestic jurists. The topic of the search for the optimal mechanism of their application, including in operational investigative activities, is discussed. The purpose of the study. Using the example of the examination of human odor traces and the forensic psychological examination of the reliability of testimony, consider the factors preventing their implementation within the framework of Russian legal realities. Conclusions. The results of the analysis showed the prospects of expert research of this kind in the case of solving organizational and methodological problems.
How to Cite:
Kocumbas S.M., Lyakhova D.A., (2021), PROBLEMS OF EVIDENTIARY SIGNIFICANCE OF SOME TYPES OF FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 276-280.
Reference list:
Appellate ruling of the Judicial Collegium on Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 07.06.2017 No. 73-APU17-8 // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2018. No. 12.
Belkin R.S. Criminalistics: a brief encyclopedia. - M., 1993.
Bodrov N.F. Development of private expert methods for solving qualitatively new expert tasks // Actual problems of Russian law. 2009. No. 3. pp. 572-583.
Gostev A.A. Possibilities of modern forensic olfactory expertise in the investigation of resumed criminal cases of violent crimes against the person // "Professional". No. 3 (149). 2019. pp. 2-4.
Demina M.L. Possibilities of verbal forensic psychological examination // Criminalistics: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2020. No. 2 (14). pp. 92-99.
Dozortseva E. G. Assessment of the reliability of witness testimony of minors / E. G. Dozortseva, A. G. Afanasyeva // Modern foreign psychology. 2015. Vol. 4. No. 3. pp. 47-56.
Engalychev V.F., Kravtsova G.K., Kholopova E.N. Forensic psychological examination to identify signs of reliability / unreliability of information reported by participants in criminal proceedings (based on video recordings of investigative actions and operational investigative measures): monogr. M.: Yurlitin-form, 2016. 328 p.
Informational letter "On the illegality of determining the reliability of testimony by forensic examination" / S.A. Smirnova [et al.] // Theory and practice of forensic examination. 2016. No. 3. pp. 64-73.
Korenevsky Yu.V. Examination of odor traces in investigative and judicial practice // Russian Justice. No. 8. 2000. pp. 29-31.
Mailis N.P. On the correlation of forensic examination, criminalistics and operational investigative activities // Proceedings of Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences. 2013. pp. 81-86.
Noskova E.V., Putintseva Yu.A. The use of special knowledge in assessing the reliability of testimony in criminal proceedings: a retrospective, doctrinal and practical approach // Justice. 2020. pp. 165-196.
Panfilov P. B. Basic principles to ensure reliability studies of olfactory traces of the person using dogs detectors in the forensic examination. M.: Yurlit-inform, 2007.
The resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of 29.06.2021 No. 22 "On amendments to certain resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on criminal cases" // Russian newspaper. 16.07.2021. No. 159.
Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 21.12.2010 No. 28 (ed. of 29.06.2021) "On forensic examination in criminal cases" // SPS Consultant Plus.
Protopopov A. False path of criminalistics // Legality. 1999. No. 10. pp. 36-38.
Sitkovskaya O.D. Psychology of witness testimony. M.: Publishing House of the Research Institute of Problems of Strengthening Law and Order at the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, 2002. [electronic resource]. - Access mode: http://yurpsy.com/files/ucheb/sitkov/03.htm - (accessed: 10/20/2021);
Sitkovskaya O.D., Konysheva L.P. Psychological examination of minors in criminal proceedings : scientific method. manual. Moscow: Unity-Dana, 2001. 72 p.
Sulimov K.T. Forensic odorology: a cynological approach. M.: Heritage Institute, 2019. 312 p.
Spasovich V.D. On the theory of forensic criminal evidence in connection with the judicial system and judicial proceedings. St. Petersburg, 1861.
Tikhonov Yu.S. Forensic psychological examination in juvenile proceedings. Ryazan, 1975. 34 p.
Belkin R.S. Criminalistics: a brief encyclopedia. - M., 1993.
Bodrov N.F. Development of private expert methods for solving qualitatively new expert tasks // Actual problems of Russian law. 2009. No. 3. pp. 572-583.
Gostev A.A. Possibilities of modern forensic olfactory expertise in the investigation of resumed criminal cases of violent crimes against the person // "Professional". No. 3 (149). 2019. pp. 2-4.
Demina M.L. Possibilities of verbal forensic psychological examination // Criminalistics: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2020. No. 2 (14). pp. 92-99.
Dozortseva E. G. Assessment of the reliability of witness testimony of minors / E. G. Dozortseva, A. G. Afanasyeva // Modern foreign psychology. 2015. Vol. 4. No. 3. pp. 47-56.
Engalychev V.F., Kravtsova G.K., Kholopova E.N. Forensic psychological examination to identify signs of reliability / unreliability of information reported by participants in criminal proceedings (based on video recordings of investigative actions and operational investigative measures): monogr. M.: Yurlitin-form, 2016. 328 p.
Informational letter "On the illegality of determining the reliability of testimony by forensic examination" / S.A. Smirnova [et al.] // Theory and practice of forensic examination. 2016. No. 3. pp. 64-73.
Korenevsky Yu.V. Examination of odor traces in investigative and judicial practice // Russian Justice. No. 8. 2000. pp. 29-31.
Mailis N.P. On the correlation of forensic examination, criminalistics and operational investigative activities // Proceedings of Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences. 2013. pp. 81-86.
Noskova E.V., Putintseva Yu.A. The use of special knowledge in assessing the reliability of testimony in criminal proceedings: a retrospective, doctrinal and practical approach // Justice. 2020. pp. 165-196.
Panfilov P. B. Basic principles to ensure reliability studies of olfactory traces of the person using dogs detectors in the forensic examination. M.: Yurlit-inform, 2007.
The resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of 29.06.2021 No. 22 "On amendments to certain resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on criminal cases" // Russian newspaper. 16.07.2021. No. 159.
Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 21.12.2010 No. 28 (ed. of 29.06.2021) "On forensic examination in criminal cases" // SPS Consultant Plus.
Protopopov A. False path of criminalistics // Legality. 1999. No. 10. pp. 36-38.
Sitkovskaya O.D. Psychology of witness testimony. M.: Publishing House of the Research Institute of Problems of Strengthening Law and Order at the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, 2002. [electronic resource]. - Access mode: http://yurpsy.com/files/ucheb/sitkov/03.htm - (accessed: 10/20/2021);
Sitkovskaya O.D., Konysheva L.P. Psychological examination of minors in criminal proceedings : scientific method. manual. Moscow: Unity-Dana, 2001. 72 p.
Sulimov K.T. Forensic odorology: a cynological approach. M.: Heritage Institute, 2019. 312 p.
Spasovich V.D. On the theory of forensic criminal evidence in connection with the judicial system and judicial proceedings. St. Petersburg, 1861.
Tikhonov Yu.S. Forensic psychological examination in juvenile proceedings. Ryazan, 1975. 34 p.
Keywords:
forensic psychological examination, credibility of testimony, odorological examination, dog detector.
Related Articles
