The genesis of the criminal law prohibition as a means of social management
( Pp. 129-132)

The article deals with the emergence and development of such a socio-cultural phenomenon as prohibition. The author substantiates the conclusion that taboos and religious prescriptions were the forerunners of prohibition as a means of social management. The emergence and development of prohibition is associated with the formation of the prototype of the modern family and society. The early signaling system used by primitive people to communicate is also based on the prohibition of performing certain actions, which leads the author to the conclusion that culture arose as a result of the implementation of prohibitions in human society. The article provides examples of prohibitions contained in the sacred writings of world religions, which relate to different epochs of human history, but have one absolute similarity - the regulation of the life of a believer primarily with the help of a ban as a social regulator. The purpose of the study is to analyze the origins of the criminal law prohibition, to identify its ontological properties as a means of social management. This circumstance will allow us to develop rules for the adequate formation of a criminal law prohibition in the process of criminalization of acts at the present stage of the development of the Russian state. Conclusions. The criminal law prohibition originates from the primary means of social management, such as taboos and religious prescriptions. The importance of the genesis of prohibition is extremely high, since the origin of such phenomena as family, culture, and society is directly related to the emergence of prohibition and its development. The study of criminal law prohibitions and the mechanisms of its formation will allow us to identify the algorithm for creating adequate, socially-conditioned prescriptions in the criminal law

Idrisov N.T., (2021), THE GENESIS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW PROHIBITION AS A MEANS OF SOCIAL MANAGEMENT. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 129-132.

Zaprety v prave i pravovoy politike: obshcheteoreticheskiy i otraslevoy aspekty: monografiya /pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk, prof., zasl. deyatelya nauki RF A.V. Mal ko. M.: RIOR: Infra-M, 2020. 380 s.
Georgievskiy E.V. Religioznye osnovaniya ugolovno-pravovykh zapretov: ot arkhaicheskogo politeizma k russkomu pravoslaviyu. M., 2014. 335 s.
Dzygivskiy P.I. Zapret kak forma sotsiokul turnoy identifikatsii: Disskan.yurid.nauk., Spb, 2000. 124 s.
Mayorova S.E. Istoriya zapretov v ugolovno-ispolnitel nom prave // Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta №1 (34). 2018. S. 132-138.
Semenov YU.I. Vvedenie vo vsemirnuyu istoriyu. Vyp.1. Problemy i ponyatiynyy apparat. Vozniknovenie chelovecheskogo obshchestva: ucheb.posobie. M., 1997. 209 s.
Markuntsov S.A. Istoricheskie osobennosti vozniknoveniya pervichnykh ugolovno-pravovykh zapretov // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. №1. S. 132-142.
Markuntsov S.A. Drevneyshee russkoe ugolovnoe pravo: vozniknovenie pervichnykh ugolovno-pravovykh zapretov. M., 2012. 155 s.
Boroday YU.M. Erotika-smert -tabu: tragediya chelovecheskogo soznaniya. M., 1996. 416 s.
Alekseev S.S. Obshchie dozvoleniya i obshchie zaprety v sovetskom prave. M., 1989. 288 s.
Ob etom podrobno sm.:Markuntsov S.A. O vzaimosvyazi protsessa akkul turatsii i soderzhaniya otdel nykh ugolovno-pravovykh zapretov // YUridicheskaya tekhnika. 2016. №10. S.517-520.
Georgievskiy E.V. Rannie religioznye verovaniya i osnovaniy ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. №1 (36). 2007. S. 45 - 48.
Inshakov S.M. Zarubezhnaya kriminologiya. M., 1997. 374 s.
Skorobogatov A.V., Rybushkin N.N. Ugolovno-pravovye zaprety v drevnerusskom zakonodatel stve // Aktual nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. №1. 2011. S. 254-259.
https://bible-teka.com/synodal/40/4/ Data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2021
http://vkorane.info/49-sura-komnaty/ Data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2021
http://nev-tanah.info/chtenie-tanax/razdel-tora/mes-patim/ Data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2021

criminal law prohibition, culture, law, taboo, religion, social management, legal anthropology.