Civil rights remedies from the perspective of the functional approach
( Pp. 72-78)

Nowadays, judicial practice requires scientific research on the conditions of the application of some remedies and the criteria for the appropriate remedy selection by the authorized person. The starting point for researching specific remedies is the notion of the remedy. It does not have any legal definition in Russian legislation and a uniform understanding in the civil law science. This work is aimed to define the concept of remedy by the functional research method. The article reviews scientists’ definitions of remedy, points out the limitations of current approaches and presents the author’s definition of the term. Remedy is defined as legal means for dispute resolution. According to the author, the function of the remedy is legal qualification of the authorized person’s claims. Using functional method to explain the essence of the remedy is justified by justified by the presence of legal means attributes in the remedy, which are analyzed in the paper. The author outlines the advantages of applying a functional approach to remedies. In particular, it allows to consider different claims as a single legal category, while simultaneously making it possible to differentiate claims depending on the purpose of the authorized person, which is important for settling disputes under the conditions of the factual individualization of the claim.

Korepanova S.V., (2020), CIVIL RIGHTS REMEDIES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 72-78.

Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga pervaya: Obshchie polozheniya: Izd. 2-e, ispr. M.: Statut, 2000. 848 s.
Brusko B.S. Kategoriya zashchity v rossiyskom konkursnom prave. M.: Volters Kluver, 2006. 200 s.
Vavilin E.V. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M.: Statut, 2016. 416 s.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: aktual nye problemy teorii i praktiki / Pod obshch. red. V.A. Belova. M.: YUrayt-Izdat, 2007. 993 s.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: ucheb.: v 3 t. T. 1. 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. / N.D. Egorov, I.V. Eliseev i dr. ; otv. red. A.P. Sergeev, YU.K. Tolstoy. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2005. 776 s.
Egorov A.V. Struktura obyazatel stvennogo otnosheniya: narabotki germanskoy doktriny i ikh primenimost v Rossii // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2011. № 3. S. 241 - 274.
Erokhova M.A. Konkurentsiya trebovaniy po Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossii: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. 161 s.
Kashkarova I.N. K voprosu o vozmozhnosti pred yavleniya al ternativnykh (fakul tativnykh) iskov v sostyazatel nom protsesse // Zakon. 2014. № 3. S. 151 - 159.
Kravchenko A.A. K voprosu o ponyatii sposoba zashchity grazhdanskikh prav // Advokat. 2014. № 7. S. 22-30.
Kuznetsova O.A. Vosstanovlenie polozheniya, sushchestvovavshego do narusheniya prava, i presechenie deystviy, narushayushchikh pravo, kak tseli i sposoby zashchity grazhdanskikh prav // YUridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel naya praktika. 2013. № 3 (25). S. 36-41.
Kuznetsova O.A. Nenadlezhashchiy sposob zashchity grazhdanskikh prav kak osnovanie dlya otkaza v iske // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. YUridicheskie nauki. 2010. № 4. S. 116 - 121.
Myasnikova N.K. Vidy iskov v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1999. 196 s.
Neznamov A.V. O ponyatiyakh quot;sposob quot;, quot;sredstvo quot;, quot;forma zashchity prava quot; i ikh vzaimodeystvii // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2013. № 6. S. 2-5.
Osokina G.L. Isk (teoriya i praktika). M.: Gorodets, 2000. 192 c.
Puginskiy B.I. Izbrannye trudy: sbornik k 75-letnemu yubileyu. M.: Izdatel stvo YUrayt, 2017. 522 s.
Regel sberger F. Obshchee uchenie o prave / Per. I.A. Bazanova; Pod red. prof. YU.S. Gambarova. M.: Tipografiya Vysochayshe utverzhdennogo T-va I.D. Sytina, 1897. 296 s.
Rozhkova M.A. Sredstva i sposoby pravovoy zashchity storon kommercheskogo spora. M.: Volters Kluver, 2006. 416 s.
Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: V 2 t. T.1: Obshchaya chast . Veshchnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektual nye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava / Otv. red. E.A. Sukhanov. 2-e izd., stereotip. M.: Statut, 2011. 958 s.
Sukhanov E.A. Kommentariy k obzoru sudebnoy praktiki po nekotorym voprosam, svyazannym s istrebovaniem imushchestva iz chuzhogo nezakonnogo vladeniya // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2009. №2. S. 126-144.
Tomsinov A.V. Predely prav pokupatelya pri obnaruzhenii nedostatkov tovara (st. 475 GK RF). Kommentariy k Opredeleniyu Sudebnoy kollegii po ekonomicheskim sporam VS RF ot 08.11.2017 N 305-ES17-9184 // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2018. № 3. S. 18-23.
Trubnikov N.N. O kategoriyakh tsel , sredstvo , rezul tat . M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1968. 148 s.
Filippova S. YU. Instrumental nyy podkhod v nauke chastnogo prava. M.: Statut, 2013. 350 c.
SHapp YA. Sistema germanskogo grazhdanskogo prava: uchebnik. M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 2006. 360 c.
SHundikov K.V. TSeli i sredstva v prave (obshcheteoreticheskiy aspekt): dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1999. 182 s.
YArkov V.V. Sootnoshenie obyazatel nosti i ispolnimosti sudebnykh aktov // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2018. № 5. S. 85-91.
Dedek H. From Norms to Facts: The Realization of Rights in Common and Civil Private Law // McGill Law Journal. 2010. vol. 56. № 1. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm abstract id 1807139 (data obrashcheniya: 07.08.2019).
Smith S. The Structure of Remedial Law. Research Handbook on Private Law Remedies. D Campbell R Halson, eds. (Edward Elgar, 2019 Forthcoming). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract 3244614 (data obrashcheniya: 16.11.2018)
Zakrzewski R. Remedies Reclassified. Oxford etc. : Oxford university press, 2005. 235 p.

civil rights protection, remedy, claim, action, functional approach.