The Concept and Content of the Right to Life in the Russian Federation
( Pp. 187-196)

More about authors
Anna E. Kanakova Cand.Sci.(law), Associate Professor of the Department of Constitutional and International Law
Altai State University
Barnaul, Russia
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to analyze the right to life and related legal categories enshrined in the legislation of the Russian Federation, in particular, the legal fact that gives rise to the right to life, the legal basis for abortion, cloning, euthanasia, suicide, the death penalty, as well as the moment which is associated with the termination of human life and, consequently, the right to life. The result of this study is the conclusion that the right to life in the Russian Federation, despite its fundamental nature, cannot be called detailed. The content of the right to life is determined by each researcher independently, because the legislator has not been clearly established which regulations should be perceived as constituent parts of the right to life. As a result, there are two approaches to understanding the right to life. According to the first point of view, a person is perceived exclusively as a biological being, therefore, the content of the right to life concerns only the issues of his biological existence. According to the second point of view, a human is considered a separate person, therefore, not only the biological existence of a person is important, but also the socio-economic aspects of his life. At the same time, the categories related to the right to life contain inaccuracies or gaps in the legal regulation. In particular, in the Russian Federation, there is no specificity in the issue of legal recognition of the moment of the beginning of a person's life, state policy regarding abortion; provisions related to the death penalty, cloning, euthanasia, suicides, etc. are controversial.
How to Cite:
Anna E.K., (2021), THE CONCEPT AND CONTENT OF THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 187-196.
Reference list:
Avak yan S. A. Konstitutsionnyy leksikon: gosudarstvenno-pravovoy terminologicheskiy slovar . Moskva: YUstitsinform, 2015. 640 c.
Avak yan S.A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. Uchebnyy kurs : uchebnoe posobie: v 2 t. T. 1. M. : YUrist , 2007. 729 s.
Antonyan YU.M. Nasil stvennaya prestupnost v Rossii. M.: INION RAN, 2001. 104 s.
Babadzhanov I.KH., Sal nikov S.P. Pravo na zhizn : ponyatie, soderzhanie i nekotorye voprosy yuridicheskogo zakrepleniya // Vestnik Akademii ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. 2010. № 4. S. 23-25.
Dvoretskiy M.YU., Anapol skaya A.I. Smertnaya kazn : za i protiv // Penitentsiarnaya nauka. 2019. № 4. S. 496-501.
Dmitriev YU.A., SHleneva E.V. Pravo cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na osushchestvlenie evtanazii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. № 11. S.52-59.
Druzhinina YU.L. Pravovoy rezhim embriona in vitro // ZHurnal Rossiyskogo prava. 2017. № 12. S. 129-140.
Zil ber A.P. Traktat ob eytanazii. Petrozavodsk: Izd-vo Petrozavodskogo gos. un-ta, 1998. 464 s.
Kapinus O. S., Makrinskaya V. I. Pravo na zhizn i sistema smezhnykh prav lichnosti // Sovremennoe pravo. 2005. № 9. S. 12-17.
Katkov D.B., Korchigo E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. M.: YUrisprudentsiya, 1999. 288 s.
Kashlakova A.S. Pravo na zhizn cheloveka: trudovoy aspekt // Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2011. № 3. S. 21-23.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Problemnyy kommentariy / Otv. red. V.A. CHetvernin. M.: TSentr konstitutsionnykh issledovaniy Moskovskogo obshchestvennogo nauchnogo fonda. 1997. 702 s.
Nevinskiy V.V. Pravo cheloveka na dostoynuyu zhizn v sisteme konstitutsionnyy tsennostey Rossii (ne vzyatyy rubezh postsovetskom istorii) // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2018. № 12. S. 56-65.
Tanaev V.M. Pravo na smert // Vestnik ekaterinburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo universiteta. ser.: pravo. 1999. № 1. S. 110-114.
Fedoseeva N.N., Frolova E.A. Problema opredeleniya pravovogo statusa embriona v mezhdunarodnom i rossiyskom prave // Meditsinskoe pravo. 2008.№ 1. S. 8-14.
Keywords:
right to life, abortion, euthanasia, cloning, death penalty.