Differentiation of gaps in the legislation from the involved phenomena in law
( Pp. 68-73)
More about authors
Ibragimova Julia Emirovna
mladshiy nauchnyy sotrudnik Otdela sudebnoy praktiki i pravoprimeneniya
The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation
The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
To separate definition of gap in legislative from other forms of uncertainty in law, many scientific articles and monographs are devoted. At the same time, in legal science there is no comprehensive study of the mechanism for establishing and eliminating gaps in legislation and its differentiation from other methods of establishing and resolving uncertainties in law, which in turn negatively affects not only legal science, but also legal practice. This article presents an analysis of judicial practice, which demonstrates that the court, having incorrectly established the presence of a gap in the legislation, chooses the wrong method of filling it, which in turn may lead to a violation of the principle of uniformity and application of the rule of law.
How to Cite:
Ibragimova J.E., (2020), DIFFERENTIATION OF GAPS IN THE LEGISLATION FROM THE INVOLVED PHENOMENA IN LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 68-73.
Reference list:
Baranov V.M. Kvalifitsirovannoe molchanie zakonodatelya kak obshchepravovoy fenomen (k voprosu o sushchnosti i sfere funktsionirovaniya probelov v prave) // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2008.n № 1. S.75- 78;
Vlasenko N. A. Logiko-strukturnye defekty sistemy sovetskogo prava // Pravovedenie. 1991. №3. S. 21-26;
Demin A.V. Kvalifitsirovannoe molchanie zakona v mekhanizme nalogovo-pravovogo regulirovaniya // Zakon. 2012. № 2. S. 129 - 137;
Lazarev V.V. Probely v prave i puti ikh ustraneniya. M., 1974. 184 s.;
Lazarev V.V., Fursov D.A. Obosnovanie idei implementatsii sudebnykh resheniy v zakonodatel nye akty // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 11. S. 5 - 21;
Nedbaylo P.E. Primenenie sovetskikh pravovykh norm. M., 1960. 511 s.
Petrov A.A., Tikhonravov E.YU. Probely i kollizii v prave: Ucheb. i nauch.-prakt. posobie. M.2017. 80 s.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie KHabarovskogo kraevogo suda ot 10.06.2015 po delu № 33-3509/2015 // SPS Konsul tant Plyus .
Vlasenko N. A. Logiko-strukturnye defekty sistemy sovetskogo prava // Pravovedenie. 1991. №3. S. 21-26;
Demin A.V. Kvalifitsirovannoe molchanie zakona v mekhanizme nalogovo-pravovogo regulirovaniya // Zakon. 2012. № 2. S. 129 - 137;
Lazarev V.V. Probely v prave i puti ikh ustraneniya. M., 1974. 184 s.;
Lazarev V.V., Fursov D.A. Obosnovanie idei implementatsii sudebnykh resheniy v zakonodatel nye akty // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 11. S. 5 - 21;
Nedbaylo P.E. Primenenie sovetskikh pravovykh norm. M., 1960. 511 s.
Petrov A.A., Tikhonravov E.YU. Probely i kollizii v prave: Ucheb. i nauch.-prakt. posobie. M.2017. 80 s.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie KHabarovskogo kraevogo suda ot 10.06.2015 po delu № 33-3509/2015 // SPS Konsul tant Plyus .
Keywords:
gaps in legislation, conflict of laws, qualified silence of the legislator, court, law enforcement.
