ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF ARTICLE 180 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
( Pp. 134-137)

More about authors
Bryka Igor Ivanovich kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii.
All-Russian State University of Justice Haperskaya Kristina Sergeevna Dolzhnost: yurist.
«LEKS» Moscow Lawyers’ Bar
Abstract:
Recently, a lot of counterfeit and substandard products have been observed in the Russian consumer market. That is a real threat to the security and stability of the country. Protection of the rights of the right holder to the means of individualization of goods (works, services) and enterprises can be carried out not only by civil, administrative and legal mechanisms, but also within the framework of the criminal law field. Thus, the article considers and analyzes the legal problems arising in the evaluation and qualification of offences under article 180 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Also a legal assessment of these contradictions is given. The author analyzes and considers the issue of gaps in the subject of the crime and in some indications of the objective side of the crime. Following the analysis, a number of proposals to improve the content of the studied norms have been made. According to the author, the proposals contained in the article can more effectively influence the reaction of the legislator to modify the considered norms of criminal law.
How to Cite:
Bryka I.I., Haperskaya K.S., (2019), ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF ARTICLE 180 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 134-137.
Reference list:
Voskanyan R.O., SHubina T.V. Nematerial nye aktivy kak sostavlyayushchaya gudvila innovatsionnoy kompanii // Auditorskie vedomosti. 2017. № 1-2. S. 85-93.
Prikaz Rospatenta ot 24.07.2018 № 128 Ob utverzhdenii Rukovodstva po osushchestvleniyu administrativnykh protsedur i deystviy v ramkakh predostavleniya gosudarstvennoy uslugi po gosudarstvennoy registratsii tovarnogo znaka, znaka obsluzhivaniya, kollektivnogo znaka i vydache svidetel stv na tovarnyy znak, znak obsluzhivaniya, kollektivnyy znak, ikh dublikatov . Podgotovleno dlya spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Sbornik postanovleniy Plenumov Verkhovnykh Sudov SSSR, RSFSR i RF po ugolovnym delam. 2 izdanie. M. Prospekt, 2017. - 624 s.
Ozhegov, S. I., SHvedova N. YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy. 4-e izd., dop. - M.: OOO A TEMP , 2006. - 944 s.
Volzhenkin, B. V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti (ekonomicheskie prestupleniya). - SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2012. - 641 s.
Bondarev, V. N. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana intellektual noy sobstvennosti: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. Rostov-na-Donu, 2012. 227s.
Vol dimarova, N. G., Voskanyan R.O. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya ekonomicheskim ugrozam v sfere kreditovaniya // Pravo i obrazovanie. 2018. № 8. S. 102-107.
Rarog, A. I. Vina v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. - Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo universiteta, 1987. - 186 s.