Features of the Introduction of Restrictive Measures in Emergency Situations
( Pp. 292-297)
More about authors
Grechkina Olga Vladimirovna
d-r yurid. nauk, professor, professor kafedry administrativnogo i informacionnogo prava
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russia Shmaliy Oksana Vasilievna d-r yurid. nauk, docent, zaveduyuschiy kafedroy administrativnogo i informacionnogo prava
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russia
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russia Shmaliy Oksana Vasilievna d-r yurid. nauk, docent, zaveduyuschiy kafedroy administrativnogo i informacionnogo prava
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
The purpose of the research. The article is devoted to the problematic issues of introducing restrictive measures in emergency situations arising due to the reorientation of legal regulation, the increased activity of regime rule-making and entailing the expansion of the discretionary powers of the authorities. It has been established that the extraordinary circumstances that have arisen in connection with the coronavirus pandemic have given rise to the problem of expanding the discretionary powers of the authorities, which is based mainly on by-laws. Conclusions. As a result of the study, the authors come to the conclusion that the adopted acts are not formally normative legal acts. At the same time, compliance with the measures that form the content of such documents is a necessary condition for overcoming negative epidemiological factors, and therefore should become mandatory.
How to Cite:
Grechkina O.V., Shmaliy O.V., (2021), FEATURES OF THE INTRODUCTION OF RESTRICTIVE MEASURES IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 292-297.
Reference list:
Isaev I.A. State interest and state of emergency: dictatorship as the art of government // History of State and Law. 2013. No. 8. S. 7-10.
Nozdrachev A.F., Starodubova O.E. Administrative and legal regimes: modern content and development trends // Journal of Russian law. 2016. No. 9.P. 146-153.
Starostin S.A. Classification of administrative and legal regimes // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2020.No. 11.P. 4.
Suite Yu.P. The concept and meaning of good faith and rationality in modern Russian law // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2010. No. 9. S. 3-10.
Emory's narrows. Anthology of world legal thought. - M.: Mysl', 1999. T. 1. - 749 p.
Nozdrachev A.F., Starodubova O.E. Administrative and legal regimes: modern content and development trends // Journal of Russian law. 2016. No. 9.P. 146-153.
Starostin S.A. Classification of administrative and legal regimes // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2020.No. 11.P. 4.
Suite Yu.P. The concept and meaning of good faith and rationality in modern Russian law // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2010. No. 9. S. 3-10.
Emory's narrows. Anthology of world legal thought. - M.: Mysl', 1999. T. 1. - 749 p.
Keywords:
administrative and legal regime, emergency situations, high alert regime, restrictive measures.
