OPEN LICENSE AS A FORM OF AUTHORIZATION TO USE THE WORK
( Pp. 49-53)

More about authors
Storozhenko Olga Mikhailovna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra «Yurisprudenciya, intellektualnaya sobstvennost i sudebnaya ekspertiza».
Moscow State Technical University named after N.E.Bauman Deltsova Natalia Veacheslavovna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra pravovogo obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy deyatelnosti.
Samara State University of Economics
Abstract:
Purpose. The study is aimed to analyze the actual legislation, legal doctrines and the legal practice concerned with the use of open license for the use of works. Resume. The study states that open license for the use of works can be considered as the specific form of license agreement that assures unbiased owner right to give approval for the use of owner’s work to the unlimited number of users in accordance to the norms of the legislation. Practical issues: The practical aspects of the study are applicable for the legal practice concerned with the approval of authors’ works use as well as improvements in the legislation regulating open license issues in Civil Law of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the study is aimed to be ground for the further research of the authors. Value: The study has been done based on new approach of analysis of legal aspects of open license as form of commercialization of the authors work.
How to Cite:
Storozhenko O.M., Deltsova N.V., (2020), OPEN LICENSE AS A FORM OF AUTHORIZATION TO USE THE WORK. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 49-53.
Reference list:
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 N 230-FZ (red. ot 18.07.2019) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF , 25.12.2006, N 52 (1 ch.), st. 5496.
Postanovlenie Suda po intellektual nym pravam ot 29 yanvarya 2018 g. po delu № A60-25972/2017. Elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc base SIP n 36898 03215334508624774 (data obrashcheniya 10.11.2019).
Bliznets I.A. Vnedrenie svobodnykh litsenziy: pravovaya ili organizatsionnaya problema // Kopirayt. - 2011. - № 2. - S. 61 - 69.
Bogdanov E.V. Pravovaya priroda soglasiya v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2019. - № 2. - S. 64 - 71.
Del tsova N.V. Ob ekty intellektual noy sobstvennosti: sistema priznakov i sistema pravovogo regulirovaniya. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Volgograd, 2004. S. 76.
Dozortsev V.A. Intellektual nye prava: Ponyatie. Sistema. Zadachi kodifikatsii: Sb. statey / Issled. tsentr chast. prava. - M. : Statut, 2005. - 416 s.
Efremova T.F. Sovremennyy tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. - M.: AST, Astrel , KHarvest, 2006. T.3.
Kataskin S.M. Soglasie v grazhdanskom prave. Avtoref. dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. - Nizhniy Novgorod, 2014. - S.9
Kontseptsiey razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, odobrennoy resheniem Soveta pri Prezidente RF po kodifikatsii i sovershenstvovaniyu grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva ot 07.10.2009 g. // Vestnik VAS RF. - 2009. - № 11.
Matveev A.G. Sozdanie pravovykh osnov tak nazyvaemykh svobodnykh litsenziy v Grazhdanskom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser.: YUridicheskie nauki. 2014. - Vyp. 3 (25). - S. 125 - 135.
Merzlikina R. A. Grazhdansko-pravovaya reglamentatsiya intellektual noy sobstvennosti v rossiyskom prave: Avtoref. dis. doktora yurid. nauk. -M., 2008. - S. 8.
Moiseichev E.YA. Svobodnye litsenzii v otkrytykh obrazovatel nykh resursakh // Internet i sovremennoe obshchestvo: sbornik nauchnykh statey: Trudy XVI Vserossiyskoy ob edinennoy konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburgskiy natsional nyy issledovatel skiy universitet informatsionnykh tekhnologiy, mekhaniki i optiki, 2013. - S. 248-249.
Petrosyan A.A., Strokova O.G. Osobennosti zarubezhnogo regulirovaniya avtorskikh prav v seti Internet // Sovremennye innovatsii. - 2018. - № 5(30). - S. 53-54.
Pravo intellektual noy sobstvennosti: Uchebnik / E.S. Grin , V.O. Kalyatin, S.V. Mikhaylov i dr.; pod obshch. red. L.A. Novoselovoy. - M.: Statut, 2017. T. 2: Avtorskoe pravo. 367 s.
Savchenko E.A. Nekotorye aspekty soblyudeniya zakonnosti sub ektami razreshitel noy i kontrol no-nadzornoy deyatel nosti v usloviyakh modernizatsii sotsial no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2019. - № 7. - S. 104 - 114.
Sagdeeva L.V. Svoystvo isklyuchitel nosti v isklyuchitel nom prave i prave sobstvennosti // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2017. - № 12. - S. 121-129.
Sobol I.A. Svobodnye litsenzii v avtorskom prave Rossii: monografiya. - M.: YUstitsinform, 2014. 196 s.
Sobol I.A. K voprosu o ponyatii svobodnoy (otkrytoy) litsenzii v avtorskom prave Rossii // Pravo i ekonomika. - 2014. - № 4. - S. 39 - 44.
Solopova N.S. Nekotorye problemy otkrytykh litsenziy v avtorskom prave // Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. - 2016. - № 1 (8). - S. 45.
Subanova N.V. Zakonodatel stvo o razreshitel noy sisteme v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sostoyanie, tendentsii razvitiya, perspektivy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. - 2015. - № 5. - S. 52 - 58;
Tekeeva L. Otkrytye litsenzii: istoriya vozniknoveniya, ponyatie i pravovaya priroda // IS. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. - 2016. - № 6. - S. 27 - 32
Keywords:
open license, authorization to use, license agreement, exclusive right, owner.