To the Question of the Use of Blockchain Depositary in the Formation of the Evidence Base in the Internet Courts of China
( Pp. 120-125)
More about authors
Ekaterina P. Rusakova
Dr.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure and International Private Law of the Law Institute, Chief Researcher
Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; Vladivostok State University
; Moscow, Russian Federation; Vladivostok, Russian Federation Chernysheva Tatyana Anatolievna
Рeoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Moscow, Russia
Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; Vladivostok State University
; Moscow, Russian Federation; Vladivostok, Russian Federation Chernysheva Tatyana Anatolievna
Рeoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the phenomenon of a blockchain depository, which contributes to an effective solution to the problem of ensuring the authenticity and legality of electronic evidence, as well as increasing the availability of a judicial form of protection of rights. The authors define the concept of a blockchain depository, reveal the models and features of the application, as well as the requirements and criteria for verifying evidence. The paper studies the legislation, doctrinal sources, opinions of judges in the PRC, devoted to this issue.
How to Cite:
Ekaterina P.R., Chernysheva T.A., (2022), TO THE QUESTION OF THE USE OF BLOCKCHAIN DEPOSITARY IN THE FORMATION OF THE EVIDENCE BASE IN THE INTERNET COURTS OF CHINA. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 120-125.
Reference list:
Bezbakh V.V., Frolova E.E. Augmented Reality and Civil Law Regulation of Business Relations / Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. - 2022. - Vol. 254. - P. 29-37. - DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8 3. - EDN BZIEMS.
Song Xiangzhen. Problems and countermeasures for the authenticity of electronic blockchain proofs // Journal of the Liuzhou Vocational Technical College. 2022. №4.).Retrieved from URL:https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=LZJB202204007&dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDTEMP&v=riC-XCOpyzA08aOLGvQj4E2UuOHr2u5mObWcWYxW5PgwP-NRlaryuGlCleTd2WuP.
Duan Liyun; Wu Boy. Authentication analysis and improvement of blockchain-notarial proofs// Journal of People's Justice. 2020. №31Retrieved from URL: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=RMSF202031004&dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDTEMP&v=KuqujOYnG2gMe0qU8V1BMwyNnXy5ArD5Xj2NukJmMZaYUpSsZ3k3dxlmj0w9Rcxj.
Kuznetsova O.A. Forms of civil rights protection: the need for a new approach / Penitentiary system and society: experience of interaction: Collection of materials of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference, Perm, 06-08 April 2022 / Comp. A.I. Sogrin. - Perm: Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service, 2022. - pp. 224-227. - EDN UXJBOG.
Rusakova E.P. The impact of digitalization on civil proceedings in Russia and abroad: the experience of China, India, Singapore, the European Union, the USA, South Africa and some other countries // Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law, Moscow, 2022. - 37 p.
Rusakova E.P, Frolova E.E. Procedural Standards for Civil Proceedings in China s Internet Courts / ESmart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. - 2022. - Vol. 288. - P. 187-192. - DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-9808-8 20. - EDN PYOQRR.
Rusakova E.P., Frolova E.E. Procedural Aspects of Proof in China s Internet Courts: Opportunities for Receiving BRICS Jurisdiction // Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap : Institute of Scientific Communications Conference. - Cham : Springer Nature, 2021. - P. 1598-1605. - DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9 176. - EDN XFLXGZ.
Han Kang. About the blockchain depository mode - comparison of a "third-party depository" and an "independent deposit" // Journal of the East China University of Science and Technology. 2021. №3.). Retrieved from URL: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2021&filename=YXST202110006&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=poGyUzdQ1-BjykJ_t2nCzBl102rpm_0op61DUozxCtJ4cb9iXxr59oGI-YI4uXwJ.
Zhao Lei; Liang Qiao. Differences in Judicial Blockchain Depository, consensus and ways forward // Journal of the Beijing Professional College of Political Science and Law.2020. №5.). Retrieved from URL: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=BZGX202202008&dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD2022&v=0HoJeH_5NENDb4dS-LAxnr0v8-YglxtuWoaO11CST-Eugqqyw5FD_-NlMKfmdhAb.
Shuai Shuai. The Internet Court of Hangzhou for the first time confirms the legal force of an electronic certificate of deposit on the blockchain.). Retrieved from URL: https://www.chinacourt.org /article /detail /2018 /06 /id /3374517.shtml (date accessed 05.10.2022).
Song Xiangzhen. Problems and countermeasures for the authenticity of electronic blockchain proofs // Journal of the Liuzhou Vocational Technical College. 2022. №4.).Retrieved from URL:https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=LZJB202204007&dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDTEMP&v=riC-XCOpyzA08aOLGvQj4E2UuOHr2u5mObWcWYxW5PgwP-NRlaryuGlCleTd2WuP.
Duan Liyun; Wu Boy. Authentication analysis and improvement of blockchain-notarial proofs// Journal of People's Justice. 2020. №31Retrieved from URL: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=RMSF202031004&dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDTEMP&v=KuqujOYnG2gMe0qU8V1BMwyNnXy5ArD5Xj2NukJmMZaYUpSsZ3k3dxlmj0w9Rcxj.
Kuznetsova O.A. Forms of civil rights protection: the need for a new approach / Penitentiary system and society: experience of interaction: Collection of materials of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference, Perm, 06-08 April 2022 / Comp. A.I. Sogrin. - Perm: Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service, 2022. - pp. 224-227. - EDN UXJBOG.
Rusakova E.P. The impact of digitalization on civil proceedings in Russia and abroad: the experience of China, India, Singapore, the European Union, the USA, South Africa and some other countries // Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law, Moscow, 2022. - 37 p.
Rusakova E.P, Frolova E.E. Procedural Standards for Civil Proceedings in China s Internet Courts / ESmart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. - 2022. - Vol. 288. - P. 187-192. - DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-9808-8 20. - EDN PYOQRR.
Rusakova E.P., Frolova E.E. Procedural Aspects of Proof in China s Internet Courts: Opportunities for Receiving BRICS Jurisdiction // Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap : Institute of Scientific Communications Conference. - Cham : Springer Nature, 2021. - P. 1598-1605. - DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9 176. - EDN XFLXGZ.
Han Kang. About the blockchain depository mode - comparison of a "third-party depository" and an "independent deposit" // Journal of the East China University of Science and Technology. 2021. №3.). Retrieved from URL: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2021&filename=YXST202110006&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=poGyUzdQ1-BjykJ_t2nCzBl102rpm_0op61DUozxCtJ4cb9iXxr59oGI-YI4uXwJ.
Zhao Lei; Liang Qiao. Differences in Judicial Blockchain Depository, consensus and ways forward // Journal of the Beijing Professional College of Political Science and Law.2020. №5.). Retrieved from URL: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=BZGX202202008&dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD2022&v=0HoJeH_5NENDb4dS-LAxnr0v8-YglxtuWoaO11CST-Eugqqyw5FD_-NlMKfmdhAb.
Shuai Shuai. The Internet Court of Hangzhou for the first time confirms the legal force of an electronic certificate of deposit on the blockchain.). Retrieved from URL: https://www.chinacourt.org /article /detail /2018 /06 /id /3374517.shtml (date accessed 05.10.2022).
Keywords:
internet court, e-justice, blockchain, blockchain depository, digitalization of legal proceedings, China.
