On Some Problems of Using Special Knowledge in Investigating Crimes
( Pp. 304-307)
More about authors
Shkhagapsoev Zaurbi Lelovich
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia Kanunnikova Natalya Gennadievna
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia Kanunnikova Natalya Gennadievna
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
The fight against crime is largely due to the use of special knowledge. Taking into account the fact that Russian legislation empowers the investigator to involve other participants with special knowledge at various stages of the criminal process, it seems necessary to note the relevance of the analysis in this context of the peculiarities of the functioning of experts and specialists. Modern investigative and judicial practice demonstrates the demand for a procedural form of using special knowledge, which is determined by criminal procedural legislation. However, at present, many questions arise regarding the effectiveness of the exclusively procedural interaction of these participants in the criminal process. The purpose of writing a research paper is to identify individual problems arising in the process of using special knowledge in the investigation of crimes. The author comes to the conclusion that, despite the demand for special knowledge at the present time, there is a problem of the lack of uniform approaches in the theoretical and legal development of this category, which significantly complicates the procedural practice in this area. The activity of specialists is highlighted as the most vulnerable area of using special knowledge in investigating crimes, which is due to the presence of a number of gaps in the regulation of their legal status as participants in criminal proceedings. Attention is focused on the need to improve not only the procedural form of using special knowledge, but also the development of reference and advisory assistance at various stages of the criminal process due to its significant potential for investigating crimes. The need to use special knowledge about information and digital technologies to improve the efficiency of the investigation of most modern crimes due to the prevalence of electronic information in the modern world is noted.
How to Cite:
Shkhagapsoev Z.L., Kanunnikova N.G., (2021), ON SOME PROBLEMS OF USING SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE IN INVESTIGATING CRIMES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 304-307.
Reference list:
Babich L.N., Lazor YU.A. Ispol zovanie spetsial nykh znaniy v protsesse dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Problemy prava: teoriya i praktika. 2020. № 50. S. 21-27.
Besedin S.M., Dudorov T.D. Spetsialist kak uchastnik ugolovnogo protsessa // TSentral nyy nauchnyy vestnik. 2020. T. 5. № 7-10 (96-99). S. 34-36.
Burtsev A.V. Primenenie spetsial nykh znaniy na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2015. № 1. S. 57-60.
Vardanyan A.V. Sovremennye problemy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // YUrist -Pravoved . 2019. № 2 (89). S. 158-163.
Isaeva L.M. Problemnye voprosy i sovremennye metody ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy v pravookhranitel noy deyatel nosti // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2019. № 3. S. 236-239.
Kudryavtsev A.V., Kudryavtseva O.G. Problemy i perspektivy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy v protsesse proverki zayavleniy (soobshcheniy) o prestupleniyakh v svete izmeneniy ugolovno-protsessual nogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 2. S. 238-241.
Lazareva L.V. Ispol zovanie spetsial nykh znaniy v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2020. № 4 (57). S. 79-84.
Nagoeva M.A. Aktual nye voprosy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy pri rassledovanii nasil stvennykh prestupleniy // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2020. № 4. S. 251-254.
KHamgokov M.M. O sushchnosti kategorii spetsial nye znaniya i vozmozhnosti ikh ispol zovaniya v ugolovnom protsesse // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. 2020. № 3. S. 168-170.
SHigurova E.I. Ispol zovanie spetsial nykh ekonomicheskikh znaniy v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Gumanitarnye i politiko-pravovye issledovaniya. 2019. № 2 (5). S. 74-80. References:
Besedin S.M., Dudorov T.D. Spetsialist kak uchastnik ugolovnogo protsessa // TSentral nyy nauchnyy vestnik. 2020. T. 5. № 7-10 (96-99). S. 34-36.
Burtsev A.V. Primenenie spetsial nykh znaniy na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2015. № 1. S. 57-60.
Vardanyan A.V. Sovremennye problemy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // YUrist -Pravoved . 2019. № 2 (89). S. 158-163.
Isaeva L.M. Problemnye voprosy i sovremennye metody ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy v pravookhranitel noy deyatel nosti // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2019. № 3. S. 236-239.
Kudryavtsev A.V., Kudryavtseva O.G. Problemy i perspektivy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy v protsesse proverki zayavleniy (soobshcheniy) o prestupleniyakh v svete izmeneniy ugolovno-protsessual nogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 2. S. 238-241.
Lazareva L.V. Ispol zovanie spetsial nykh znaniy v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2020. № 4 (57). S. 79-84.
Nagoeva M.A. Aktual nye voprosy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy pri rassledovanii nasil stvennykh prestupleniy // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2020. № 4. S. 251-254.
KHamgokov M.M. O sushchnosti kategorii spetsial nye znaniya i vozmozhnosti ikh ispol zovaniya v ugolovnom protsesse // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. 2020. № 3. S. 168-170.
SHigurova E.I. Ispol zovanie spetsial nykh ekonomicheskikh znaniy v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Gumanitarnye i politiko-pravovye issledovaniya. 2019. № 2 (5). S. 74-80. References:
Keywords:
special knowledge, specialist, expert opinion, crime investigation, criminal procedure.
Related Articles
1. SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE, PROFESSOR SHCHERBA SERGEJ PETROVICH Pages: 16-18 Issue №9149
PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF RELATION BETWEEN EXPERT CONCLUSION AND SPECIALIST OPINION
special knowledge
procedural forms of using special knowledge
opinion and expert testimony
conclusion and testimony of a specialist
Show more
16. OTHER Pages: 239-243 Issue №5902
TYPES OF LINGUISTIC EXPERT EXAMINATION IN JURISPRUDENCE: PURPOSE AND RESULTS
linguistic expertise
special knowledge
judicial speech study
defense in court
the rule of law
Show more
14. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES 12.00.12 Pages: 318-321 Issue №17564
Subject, objects and tasks of forensic examination of intellectual property objects
forensic science
forensic examination
special knowledge
patents
trademarks
Show more
13. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES (12.00.12) Pages: 270-276 DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2021-14-3-270-276 Issue №18933
Conceptual Foundations of the Private Theory of Forensic Economic Expertise
specialist participation
specialized knowledge
forensic activity
preliminary research
specialist consultation
Show more
6. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Pages: 247-249 Issue №16680
On the expedience of fixed procedural terms of preliminary investigation and inquiry
procedural terms
preliminary investigation
inquiry
reasonable time
criminal procedure
Show more
5. PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) (5.1.2.) Pages: 260-266 Issue №21729
Expertise as a Form of Evidence in the Tax Process
expertise
evidence
tax process
means of proof
decision
Show more
CRIMINAL LAW (5.1.4.) Pages: 263-267 Issue №24238
The Use of Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in the Prevention of Extremist and Terrorist Crimes
extremism
terrorism
artificial intelligence
digital technologies
crime investigation
Show more
6. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Pages: 235-237 Issue №16680
Features of the use of special psychological knowledge in criminal proceedings
psychologist
psychological knowledge
criminal process
examination
suspect
Show more
10. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES (12.00.12) Pages: 256-259 Issue №17401
Digital evidence in crime investigations
evidence digitalization
crime investigation
digital technologies
cybercrime
Internet
Show more
15. Criminal procedure Pages: 239-246 Issue №12273
THE RIGHT OF THE ADVOCATE-DEFENDER TO RECEPTION OPINION OF A SPECIALIST AND ITS PRESENTATION TO SUBJOIN TO THE MATERIALS OF THE CRIMINAL CASE: GUARANTEE AND PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION
criminal proceedings
defense attorney
specialist
expert opinion
expert
Show more