SEIZURE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: HISTORY AND CURRENT STATE
( Pp. 176-178)
More about authors
Shogenov Anzor Mukhamedovich
Dolzhnost: starshiy prepodavatel. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ognevoy podgotovki.
Krasnodar University of MIA Russia. Branch: Caucasian Advanced Training Institute Abidov Ruslan Rizuanovich Police Major, senior lecturer at the Department of Fire Training
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Krasnodar University of MIA Russia. Branch: Caucasian Advanced Training Institute Abidov Ruslan Rizuanovich Police Major, senior lecturer at the Department of Fire Training
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
In the present article, the authors, on the basis of a historical digression, analyze the features of the formation and development of such investigative actions as excavation. Pointing to the existing problems that complicate the seizure in criminal proceedings of our time, the authors suggest ways to minimize them, including the correction of article 183 of the criminal procedure code and the addition of article 5 of the criminal procedure code of legislative terminology. The material of the article has a practical orientation and is focused on the improvement of the criminal procedural legislation regulating seizure in criminal proceedings.
How to Cite:
Shogenov A.M., Abidov R.R., (2019), SEIZURE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: HISTORY AND CURRENT STATE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 176-178.
Reference list:
Kuznetsov A. N. Sposoby sobiraniya dokazatel stv: aktualizatsiya Ustava ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva 1864 goda // Sudebnaya vlast i ugolovnyy protsess. 2014. №3. S. 169.
Karagodin V. N. Osmotr mesta proisshestviya, obysk ili vyemka // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. № 5. S. 31.
Muratov K. D. Istoricheskie tendentsii formirovaniya pravovykh osnov vyemki i ee posledstviy po rossiyskomu zakonodatel stvu (nachalo KH - konets KHVIII v.) // VEPS. 2011. №2. S. 123.
Rossinskiy S.B. Razmyshleniya o sushchnosti vyemki kak ob ekta ugolovno-protsessual nogo regulirovaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2018. №1. S. 43.
Sazhaev A.M. Vyemka kak sledstvennoe deystvie: istoriya razvitiya i sovremennost // Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ikh resheniya: sbornik nauchno-prakticheskikh trudov. Vypusk 1. - M.: Izdatel stvo OOO Buki Vedi , 2013. S. 173.
Karagodin V. N. Osmotr mesta proisshestviya, obysk ili vyemka // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. № 5. S. 31.
Muratov K. D. Istoricheskie tendentsii formirovaniya pravovykh osnov vyemki i ee posledstviy po rossiyskomu zakonodatel stvu (nachalo KH - konets KHVIII v.) // VEPS. 2011. №2. S. 123.
Rossinskiy S.B. Razmyshleniya o sushchnosti vyemki kak ob ekta ugolovno-protsessual nogo regulirovaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2018. №1. S. 43.
Sazhaev A.M. Vyemka kak sledstvennoe deystvie: istoriya razvitiya i sovremennost // Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ikh resheniya: sbornik nauchno-prakticheskikh trudov. Vypusk 1. - M.: Izdatel stvo OOO Buki Vedi , 2013. S. 173.
