Contract negotiations in business: the legal nature and problems of law enforcement
( Pp. 42-47)

The article deals with the legal nature of contract negotiations and pre-contractual liability. A brief critical analysis of a number of positions expressed in the literature is given and it is concluded that such negotiations are by law a legal fact that generates the rights and obligations of the participants in the negotiations. According to the author, the law does not provide for the possibility of recovery of lost profits for violation of these obligations, although judicial practice has resolved the relevant disputes differently. The positions of the courts that differ from the doctrinal understanding of the meaning of the law should be explained by the nature of justice as a proceeding interested in formulating rules that are convenient and understandable for application, which are not always based on the content of the law, however, their appearance in addition to the pragmatic tasks of the courts should be explained by the vagueness of this content.

Zankovsky S.S., (2020), CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS IN BUSINESS: THE LEGAL NATURE AND PROBLEMS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 42-47.

Kazachenok O.P., Vitvitskaya V.R. Znachenie zakonodatel nogo zakrepleniya stadii preddogovornykh peregovorov v grazhdanskom zakonodatel stve: retrospektivnyy analiz. ( quot;Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess quot;, 2017, N 3).
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23.06.2015 N 25 quot;O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy razdela I chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;.
Demkina A.V. Vedenie peregovorov kak osnovanie vozniknoveniya obyazatel stva ( quot;YUridicheskiy mir quot;, 2016, N 5).
Krasavchikov O.A. YUridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. M., 1958, s. 19 i sl.
Kazachenok S.YU. Protsedura preddogovornykh vzaimootnosheniy mezhdu storonami predprinimatel skogo dogovora kak stadiya zaklyucheniya dogovora // Predprinimatel skoe pravo. 2019. N 1. S. 39 - 45.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2016 N 7 (red. ot 07.02.2017) quot;O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie obyazatel stv quot;.
Sm. Fleyshits E.A. Obyazatel stva iz prichineniya vreda i iz neosnovatel nogo obogashcheniya. M., 1951, s. 12. SHershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava.M., 1995, s. 392.
Idrisov KH.V. Problemnye voprosy preddogovornoy otvetstvennosti: doktrinal nye podkhody i pozitsii sudebnoy praktiki // Lex russica. 2018. N 10. S. 98 - 105.
Maleina M.N. Peregovory o zaklyuchenii dogovora (ponyatie, pravovoe regulirovanie, pravila quot;ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava quot;, 2016, N 10.
Ayusheeva I.Z. Preddogovornaya otvetstvennost : novelly grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva i sudebnoy praktiki // Lex russica. 2017. N 5. S. 136 - 147.
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 29.11.2017 N F05-16349/2017 po delu N A41-90214/2016.
Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2016 N 7 (red. ot 07.02.2017) quot;O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie obyazatel stv quot;.
Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ekonomicheskim sporam Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29.01.2020 N 305-ES19-19395 po delu N A40-98757.

negotiations, liability, damages, tort, loss of profit, information, contract, tort, legal relationship, legal nature, obligation, good faith.