Judicial fines in Russian criminal law: problems of terminology
( Pp. 167-169)

More about authors
Mikhaylov Dmitriy Olegovich Dolzhnost: sudya. Dolzhnost: prepodavatel. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava
Zheleznodorozhniy district court city of Simferopol; Russian academy of justice. Branch: Crimean branch
Abstract:
The relevance of the problem and the purpose of the study. The article analyzes the problem of terminology in determining the concept of" judicial fine " in the domestic criminal legislation. The relevance of this problem is predetermined by the importance of the development of optimal legislative structures, such as the choice of the term to refer to the concept of "judicial fine". The methodological basis of the work is formed by the dialectical principles of research, systemic, comparative legal and other scientific methods. The main results of the study. For the formal designation of such a measure of criminal law as a judicial fine, in order to more accurately reflect its legal nature, it is more appropriate to use the phrase "criminal law penalty of a material nature." Such theoretical construction will allow to partially neutralize the terminological contradiction in the criminal code. Scientific and practical significance of the work lies in the possibility of applying the relevant findings in the formation of domestic criminal policy; in the implementation of further scientific research in the designated area; in the study of criminal law in Universities and colleges. The article is intended for students, undergraduates, postgraduates, teachers of law faculties and law Schools, law enforcement officers, practicing lawyers, as well as for anyone interested in the problems of the relevant topics.
How to Cite:
Mikhaylov D.O., (2018), JUDICIAL FINES IN RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW: PROBLEMS OF TERMINOLOGY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 167-169.
Reference list:
Pozdeev D.A. Sudebnyy shtraf v rossiyskom material nom i protsessual nom prave // Aktual nye problemy vzaimosvyazi ugolovnogo prava i protsessa: sbornik materialov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Ufa, Institut prava BashGU, 31 oktyabrya 2016 g.). Ufa: RITS BashGU, 2016. S. 217-219.
Kuzovenkova YU.A. Denezhnoe vzyskanie v sisteme mer ugolovno-protsessual noy otvetstvennosti: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2009. - 209 s. Elektronnyy resurs . URL:http://www.dissercat.com/content/ denezhnoe-vzyskanie-v-sisteme-mer-ugolovno-protsessualnoiotvetstvennosti ixzz4K0RMRNbg (data obrashcheniya: 30.07.2018).
Poyasnitel naya zapiska k proektu Federal nogo zakona O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya osnovaniy i poryadka osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Avtomatizirovannaya sistema zakonodatel noy deyatel nosti Elektronnyy resurs . URL: http://asozd.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/(Spravka) OpenAgent RN 953369-6 (data obr.: 30.07.2018).
Blagov E.V. Sudebnyy shtraf kak zerkalo ugolovnogo zakonotvorchestva // 20 let Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: itogi, problemy, perspektivy: Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: V 2-kh ch. / Otv. red. L.YU. Larina. 2016. S. 71 - 72.
Inogamova-KHegay L.V. Nakazanie fizicheskogo i yuridicheskogo litsa kak forma realizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i ego naznachenie // Biblioteka ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii. 2016. № 5. S. 141-149.