THE ISSUE OF QUALIFICATION OF FRAUD AND ITS DIFFERENTIATION FROM SOME OTHER RELATED CRIMES
( Pp. 121-125)
More about authors
Khutuev Valery Arturovich
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Kashirgov Astemir Khasanbievich Police Major, Lecturer, Department of Law Enforcement Organization, North Caucasian Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Kashirgov Astemir Khasanbievich Police Major, Lecturer, Department of Law Enforcement Organization, North Caucasian Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
In order to achieve perfection in the activities of authorized persons of judicial and law enforcement bodies when considering within the competence of the issues of qualification of fraud and its differentiation from other related compositions of socially dangerous acts of property orientation (crimes against property), such as theft, robbery, embezzlement, causing property damage, the method of which are cheating or abuse of trust, this article deals with the qualification of public dangerous act - "Fraud" responsibility for which is provided by article 159 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation and the key differences of this corpus delicti promoting the correct qualification (differentiation) of the specified types of crimes as causes relevance of the specified subject on which scientific works including are directed and on assistance to practical workers of law enforcement system of Russia in prevention, identification and disclosure of crimes against property. At the same time, the relevance of this topic is associated with a significant annual increase in the number of crimes registered by law enforcement agencies related to fraud and aimed at the criminal acquisition of property or rights to it. In recent years, the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation has been amended with regard to the introduction of new offences, the responsibility for which is provided for in articles 159.1-159.6 of the criminal code, and related to fraud in the field of credit, insurance and computer information, as well as when receiving payments using electronic means of payment[1]. The fact of the growing number of "sub-species" of fraud and related offences, improvement and sophistication of modern scams, job errors, practitioners of the law enforcement unit of the Russian Federation in detecting and investigating such crimes, and not infrequently arise between lawyers disputes about the qualification of the acts in this category, prepared this material. The article is a structured information data for law enforcement officers specializing in the investigation of this category of cases.
How to Cite:
Khutuev V.A., Kashirgov A.K., (2019), THE ISSUE OF QUALIFICATION OF FRAUD AND ITS DIFFERENTIATION FROM SOME OTHER RELATED CRIMES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 121-125.
Reference list:
Golyandin N.P., Mashekuasheva M.KH. Problemnye voprosy protivodeystviya mekhanizmam finansirovaniya terrorizma. // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2018. № 4. S. 158-160.
SHogenov A.M. Sovremennoe sostoyanie prestupleniy ekstremistskoy napravlennosti v Rossii i problemy dokazyvaniya. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. №3. 2019.
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po teoreticheskim osnovam kvalifikatsii prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh stat yami 159-159.6 UK RF. Razrabotany na kafedre ugolovnogo prava Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossiyskoy Federatsii.
Ugolovnoe pravo v evolyutsioniruyushchem obshchestve: problemy i perspektivy: sb. nauch. st. po materialam VII Mezhdunar. zaochnoy nauch.-prakt. konf., 15-16 dekabrya 2016 goda / red. kol.: A. A. Greben kov (otv. red.) i dr. ; YUgoZap. gos. un-t. - Kursk, 2017. - 432 s. ISBN 978-5-7681-1222-6.
Garifullina Razilya Fayzullinovna. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii vymogatel stva (ST. 163 UK RF). Evraziyskiy nauchno-issledovatel skiy institut problem prava.2016.№3. S. 208-210.
KHutuev V.A. Nezakonnoe voznagrazhdenie ot imeni yuridicheskogo litsa kak administrativnoe pravonarushenie: istoriya i perspektiva. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 5. S. 266-269.
SHogenov A.M. Sovremennoe sostoyanie prestupleniy ekstremistskoy napravlennosti v Rossii i problemy dokazyvaniya. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. №3. 2019.
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po teoreticheskim osnovam kvalifikatsii prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh stat yami 159-159.6 UK RF. Razrabotany na kafedre ugolovnogo prava Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossiyskoy Federatsii.
Ugolovnoe pravo v evolyutsioniruyushchem obshchestve: problemy i perspektivy: sb. nauch. st. po materialam VII Mezhdunar. zaochnoy nauch.-prakt. konf., 15-16 dekabrya 2016 goda / red. kol.: A. A. Greben kov (otv. red.) i dr. ; YUgoZap. gos. un-t. - Kursk, 2017. - 432 s. ISBN 978-5-7681-1222-6.
Garifullina Razilya Fayzullinovna. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii vymogatel stva (ST. 163 UK RF). Evraziyskiy nauchno-issledovatel skiy institut problem prava.2016.№3. S. 208-210.
KHutuev V.A. Nezakonnoe voznagrazhdenie ot imeni yuridicheskogo litsa kak administrativnoe pravonarushenie: istoriya i perspektiva. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 5. S. 266-269.
