Substantive consolidation during insolvency of company group as example of ignoring principle of limited liability
( Pp. 62-65)
More about authors
Akhmetov Azat Ildarovich
aspirant. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo prava.
Russian state university of justice
Russian state university of justice
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the principle of corporate law - the principle of limited liability of a corporation participant. The principle of limited liability, which arose during the existence of simple corporations as a means of stimulating the investment of individuals, should be applied in accordance principle of justice and the objectives of this institution, as indicated by the current trends in regulating the bankruptcy of business groups.
How to Cite:
Akhmetov A.I., (2018), SUBSTANTIVE CONSOLIDATION DURING INSOLVENCY OF COMPANY GROUP AS EXAMPLE OF IGNORING PRINCIPLE OF LIMITED LIABILITY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 62-65.
Reference list:
I. Mevorach. Appropriate treatment of corporate groups in insolvency - a universal view. (2006) P. 179.
D.G. Baird, Substantive Consolidation Today (2006) 47 B.C.L.Rev. P. 6.
J.S. Ziegel, Corporate Groups and Crossborder Insolvencies: A Canada-United States Perspective (2002) 7 Fordham J. Corp. and Fin. L. P.367.
James H.M. Sprayregen, Jonathan P. Friedland, and Jeffrey W. Gettleman. The Sum and Substance of Substantive Consolidation. P.2.
Rukovodstvo YUNSITRAL dlya zakonodatel nykh organov po voprosam zakonodatel stva o nesostoyatel nosti. CHast tret ya: Rezhim predprinimatel skikh grupp pri nesostoyatel nosti. S. 65-66.
Timothy E. Graulich, Substantive Consolidation - a post-modern trend. // ABI L. Rev. P. 547.
Widen W.H. Report to the American Bankruptcy Institute: Prevalence of Substantive Consolidation in Large Public Company Bankruptcies from 2000 to 2005 // 16 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 2008. P. 23.
Andrew Brasher. Substantive Consolidation: A Critical Examination. P.7 (http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/ corp gov/papers/Brudney2006 Brasher.pdf).
Landers J.M. A Unified Approach to Parent, Subsidiary, and Affiliate Questions in Bankruptcy // 42 U. Chi. L. Rev. P. 592.
Sukhanov E.A. Sravnitel noe korporativnoe pravo. - M.: Statut, 2014. S.163-169.
Richard A. Posner. The Rights of Creditors of Affiliated Corporations, 43 U. CHI. L. REV. 499, 508 (1976).
YAstrebova E.S. Institut yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v korporativnom prave. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2017. - №3, str. 330-334.
D.G. Baird, Substantive Consolidation Today (2006) 47 B.C.L.Rev. P. 6.
J.S. Ziegel, Corporate Groups and Crossborder Insolvencies: A Canada-United States Perspective (2002) 7 Fordham J. Corp. and Fin. L. P.367.
James H.M. Sprayregen, Jonathan P. Friedland, and Jeffrey W. Gettleman. The Sum and Substance of Substantive Consolidation. P.2.
Rukovodstvo YUNSITRAL dlya zakonodatel nykh organov po voprosam zakonodatel stva o nesostoyatel nosti. CHast tret ya: Rezhim predprinimatel skikh grupp pri nesostoyatel nosti. S. 65-66.
Timothy E. Graulich, Substantive Consolidation - a post-modern trend. // ABI L. Rev. P. 547.
Widen W.H. Report to the American Bankruptcy Institute: Prevalence of Substantive Consolidation in Large Public Company Bankruptcies from 2000 to 2005 // 16 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 2008. P. 23.
Andrew Brasher. Substantive Consolidation: A Critical Examination. P.7 (http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/ corp gov/papers/Brudney2006 Brasher.pdf).
Landers J.M. A Unified Approach to Parent, Subsidiary, and Affiliate Questions in Bankruptcy // 42 U. Chi. L. Rev. P. 592.
Sukhanov E.A. Sravnitel noe korporativnoe pravo. - M.: Statut, 2014. S.163-169.
Richard A. Posner. The Rights of Creditors of Affiliated Corporations, 43 U. CHI. L. REV. 499, 508 (1976).
YAstrebova E.S. Institut yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v korporativnom prave. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2017. - №3, str. 330-334.
