Certain Problems of the Measures of Responsibility of the Antimonopoly Legislation to Digital Markets
( Pp. 85-88)

The article is devoted to the issue of application of antimonopoly law and legislation on administrative offenses to cases of violation of antimonopoly law in digital markets. The purpose of the study was to consider certain problems of the measures of responsibility and response of the antimonopoly authority established in the current legislation to such violations, including taking into account examples from foreign experience. The author came to the conclusion that it is necessary to revise the procedure for calculating fines, assess the feasibility of their appointment, as well as consider establishing a clear procedure for applying such a measure as forced separation.

Yaremchuk A.V., (2022), CERTAIN PROBLEMS OF THE MEASURES OF RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ANTIMONOPOLY LEGISLATION TO DIGITAL MARKETS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 85-88.

B. Darte, P. Pedro, V. Joao. Does vertical separation necessarily reduce quality discrimination and increase welfare? - BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, 2012.
R. J. Gilbert. Separation: The cure for abuse of dominance on the platform. Information economy and politics. 54 (2021). 100876. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100876.
Sokolov A.Yu., Krotov K.S., Dzhamirze B.Yu., Batova V.N. Problems of administrative responsibility for the unfair use of digital platforms. 2020. Springer, Cham. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39797-5_12.
Ho ppner, T. (2020, November 24). Google s (non-) compliance with the EU shopping decision. Competition Policy International. URL: https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/googles-non-compliance-with-the-eu-shopping-decision/.

digital markets, responsibility, digital platforms, antitrust regulation, competition law, forced separation.