About some features of the search tactics
( Pp. 230-234)

The purpose of the study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the search tactics and identify its features. In the course of the study, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: analysis, synthesis, induction, interviewing and comparison. As a result of the study, the authors came to the following conclusions and results. 1. Knowledge and timely application of tactical techniques in the production of a search can significantly increase its effectiveness. 2. The tactics of conducting a search are more complex than the tactics of seizure, which is associated with the difficulties of carrying out the actions of the claim, a significant increase in the forces and means used, and the degree of opposition to the investigation. 3. The most effective tactical techniques used in the activities of investigative units in the preparation and conduct of a search have been identified, which have positively proven themselves in practice. 4. Objects subject to seizure when found during a search have been systematized. 5. The investigator has the possibility of stopping the conduct of the search in the event of the release of the sought-after objects, however, as a rule, it seems inappropriate to use it, because the possibility is not excluded that the person who is being searched is trying to hide something from the investigator, motivating the latter to premature termination of this investigative action.

Solodovnik V.V., Chabukiani O.A., (2021), ABOUT SOME FEATURES OF THE SEARCH TACTICS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 230-234.

Abdullina S.KH. Nekotorye problemy preodoleniya protivodeystviya pri obyske i vyemke // The europe and the turkic world: science, engineering and technology (Izmir, Turkey, 29-31 maya 2017 goda). - Pavlodar, 2017. - S. 87-92.
Borisov A.B. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). M.: Knizhnyy mir, 2008. - 928 s.
Klochkov A.V. O nekotorykh osobennostyakh taktiki podgotovki k proizvodstvu obyska v khode predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika: traditsii i novatsii: sb. statey Mezhdunarod. nauchno-prakticheskoy konf. - M., 2016. - S. 66-70.
Morozova N.V. Psikhologicheskie aspekty provedeniya obyska i vyemki // Obespechenie prav i zakonnykh interesov grazhdan v deyatel nosti organov doznaniya i predvaritel nogo sledstviya: sb. statey konf. (g. Oryel, 27 oktyabrya - 05 2017 goda). - Orel, 2018. - S. 215-220.
Popova N.A. Veshchestvennye dokazatel stva v ugolovnom protsesse// Vestnik TGU. - 2007. - № 1 (45). - S. 73-80.
Prigovor Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 11 noyabrya 2016 goda po delu № 1- 59/2016 // https://sudact.ru/
Prigovor Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda g. Nizhniy Novgorod ot 14 sentyabrya 2018 goda po delu № 1 - 52/ 2018 // https://sudact.ru/
Pushkarev V.V. Poryadok i taktika proizvodstva obyska // Epokha nauki. - 2017. - № 11. - S. 56-62.
Rezul taty interv yuirovaniya sotrudnikov sledstvennogo upravleniya UMVD Rossii po g. Belgorodu v 2019 godu.
KHarina E.N. Obysk: vidy i tseli, osobennosti proizvodstva v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Vestnik Universiteta imenii O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). - 2019. - № 3 (55). - S. 148-159.
SHarkov V.A. Rabota sledovatelya po podgotovke k proizvodstvu obyska (vyemki) // Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosy yurisprudentsii // Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosy yurisprudentsii: sb. statey Mezhdunarod. nauchno-prakticheskoy konf. (Barnaul, 29 aprelya 2016 goda). - Barnaul, 2016. - S. 159-161.

search, investigator, investigative action, tactics, criminalistics, tactical technique.