Parliamentary Factor of Transformation of Constitutional Freedom of Expression
( Pp. 76-81)

In this article, the author proposes an analysis of foreign and domestic constitutional acts, with a view to reflecting in them the parliamentary factor in the transformation of constitutional freedom of expression. Initially, freedom of speech was identified with members of parliament and was expressed as a guarantee of the legislative function. The legally recognized privileges of parliamentary freedom of expression are reflected in the Bill of Rights and First Generation Constitutions. The domestic constitutional experience, on the contrary, primarily formalized freedom of speech, and secondarily, guarantees of freedom of speech and debate in parliament.

Gelunenko V.V., (2021), PARLIAMENTARY FACTOR OF TRANSFORMATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 76-81.

Agafonov V.V. Freedom of parliamentary activity and its provision in modern conditions // Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2007. No. 2 (3). P. 31-39.
Andreev S.D., Bezuglaya A.A. The right to freedom of thought and speech and its limits in the Russian Federation // Science and education: economy and financial economy; entrepreneurship; law and governance. 2021. No. 5 (132). P. 57-60.
Batchelder R.D. Sunquist: a narrow reading of the doctrine of legislative immunity // Cornell law review. New York, 1990. Vol. 75, № 2. P. 388-390.
Gelunenko V.V. Constitutional formalization of freedom of speech in the Constitutions of Eastern European states // Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V.I. Vernadsky. Legal sciences. No. 4. 2018. P. 333-337.
Karateev A.Yu., Chetyrina N.A. Collection of documents on the history of modern times. Studying guide. M. 2017.117 p.
Kasymov R.Sh. Party discipline as a factor of intraparty democracy // Kazan social and humanitarian bulletin. No. 2. 2016. P. 13-16.
Constitutional law of foreign countries: textbook for academic bachelor's degree / G.N. Komkova, E.V. Kolesnikov, O. V. Afanasyev. 6th ed., Rev. and add. M.: Yurayt Publishing House. 2018.380 p.
Labutina T.L. The first precedent of the exclusion of a deputy in the history of English parliamentarianism: "The Case" of Richard Style // Tauride Readings 2014. Actual Problems of Parliamentarism: History and Modernity. Collection of scientific articles. 2015.P. 174-179.
Markhgeim M.V., Nikonova L.I., Minasyan A.A. Let's respond to the recall: discussion about the institution of recall of a deputy of the federal and regional parliaments // Science and education: economy and financial economy; entrepreneurship; law and governance. No. 6. 2019. P. 65-69.
Nikonova L.I., Bezuglaya A.A. Forms of direct democracy: constitutional foundations for discussion // Science and education: economy and financial economy; entrepreneurship; law and governance. 2020. No. 3 (118). P. 86-90.
Tomsinov V.A. The Glorious Revolution of 1688-1689 in England and the Bill of Rights. M.: Zertsalo-M. 2010. (in the appendix to the book the full text of the Bill of Rights of 1689 was published in English and translated by the author into Russian on pp. 236-250).
Trofimova G.A. On the limits of parliamentary freedom // Russian legal journal. No. 2. 2016. P. 82-89.
Fedorov V.V. Problems of regulating the activities of political parties and party discipline // News of higher educational institutions. Ural region. No. 6. 2014. P. 17-21.

Constitution, freedom of speech, opinion, parliament, parliamentary, deputy, parliamentary discipline.