On the Use of Legal Entities in the Brand Name of the Words "Exchange", "Trading System", "Trade Organizer"
( Pp. 128-135)

Certain requirements are imposed on the corporate name of a commercial organization, which are contained not only in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, but also in other laws that regulate certain types of economic activity. The article discusses the peculiarities of using the words "exchange", "trading system", "trade organizer" in the names of organizations that are not trade organizers and do not have the appropriate license from the Bank of Russia. In addition, the consequences of violating this prohibition were revealed - bringing to administrative responsibility under Part 2 of Article 14.24 of the Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation, the practice of challenging decisions of authorized bodies on bringing to responsibility was analyzed. The article contains proposals for improving legislation in this area and in the practice of its application.

Kochkurova K.S., (2021), ON THE USE OF LEGAL ENTITIES IN THE BRAND NAME OF THE WORDS "EXCHANGE", "TRADING SYSTEM", "TRADE ORGANIZER". Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 128-135.

Afanasyeva E.G., Dolgikh M.G., Afanasyeva E.A. Means of individualization in entrepreneurial activity: legal issues (textbook; editor-in-chief E.V. Alferova; second ed., Revised and supplemented). - INION RAS, Center for Social scientific-inform. issled., Dept. jurisprudence. - M .: INION RAN, 2020, 210 p.
Bolotin S. S. Controversial issues of protection of rights to means of individualization // Ex jure. 2020. No. 1. S. 73-84;
Gavrilov E.P. Industrial property law. Industrial rights. XXI Century. M .: Yurservitum. 2016.729s.
Gavrilov E.P. Rights to means of individualization // Patents and licenses. Intellectual rights. 2016. No. 5. // SPS "Garant"
Golovanova T.V., Yuritsin A.E. Administrative responsibility for the use of the words "exchange", "trading system", "trade organizer" in the name of a legal entity // Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy. 2018.Vol. 15.No. 2.P. 206-211.
Ermakov A.V., Sergeeva N.Yu. Brand name: individual problems of the theory // Citizen and law. 2020. No. 12. S. 44-49.
Kirilov DA Protected objects of intellectual activity and means of individualization // Achievements of science and education. 2021. No. 3 (75). S. 55-60
Kleimenova MO Problems arising in the implementation of the registration regime of means of individualization of legal entities, goods, works and services // Property relations in the Russian Federation. 2016. No. 4 (175). Pp. 27-31
Lavrik TM, Fedosova NV On the issue of the use of corporate names in corporate activities and the peculiarities of their legal protection // Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. 2017. No. 1. S. 82-85.
Mazin D.I., Inshakova A.O. Legal entity in Russian law: mandatory signs // StudNet. 2020. No. 4. S.362-369.
Intellectual property law: Textbook. T. 3: Means of individualization / A.S. Vorozhevich, O.S. Grin ', V.A. Korneev and others; under total. ed. L.A. Novoselova. M., 2018.S. 225;
Ruzakova O.A. How would you call a yacht: about means of individualization: Scientific-method. allowance / Ed. L.A. Novoselova. M .: Prospect, 2019.96s.
Sviridova E.A. The firm name and the name of a non-profit organization: correlation problems // Education and law. 2017. No. 10. S.83-88.
Slizkov R.I. Content of the right to a trade name // Actual problems of our time: science and society. 2017. No. 1 (14). S. 34-36.
Usanova V.A. Some problems of legal regulation of the names of legal entities // Scientific Bulletin of the VF RANEPA. 2016. No. 1. P. 59 - 68
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Saratov Region dated September 18, 2015 in case No. A57-15286 / 2015
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Republic of Tatarstan dated 12.10.2015 in case No. A65-19267 / 2015
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Krasnodar Territory dated 09.11.2015 in case No. A33-32916 / 2015
Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Ural District No. F09-7565 / 15 dated 09.11.2015 in case No. A50-5714 / 2015
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Krasnodar Territory dated November 24, 2015 in case No. А32-35084 / 2015
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Altai Territory dated November 27, 2015 in case No. А03-14514 / 2015
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Irkutsk Region dated 07.12.2015 in case No. A19-3347 / 2015
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Tyumen Region dated 15.12.2015 in case No. A70-14432 / 2015
Decision of the Intellectual Property Rights Court dated January 19, 2016 in case No. SIP-624/2015
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Chelyabinsk Region dated 05/11/2016 in case No. А76-7602 / 2016
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Ivanovo Region of 08/30/2016 in case No. A17-5416 / 2016
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Krasnodar Territory dated 05/30/2017 in case No. А32-6906 / 2017
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Krasnodar Territory dated June 28, 2017 in case No. А32-11504 / 2017
The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Rostov Region of August 16, 2017 in case No. A53-17417 / 17
Ruling of the Fifteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated October 18, 2017 in case No. A53-17417 / 17
The Arbitration Court of the Udmurt Republic dated 07.08.2019 in case No. A71- 9876/2019

name of a legal entity, firm name of a commercial organization, stock exchange, trade organizer, trading system.