Comparative analysis of criminal law regulation responsibility for theft in the form of theft
( Pp. 125-129)

Task. The relevance of work is conditioned by the fact that the basis of life in any society, regardless ofany features of social, political and economic nature, are, first of all, the benefits of materialnature. The results of expert surveys of law enforcement officers, whose official duties include the disclosure and investigation of crimes against the personal property of citizens (including, burglaries, theft of motor vehicles),show that about 66% of respondents faced facts when victims of theft in the form of theft spoke about their it is in great interest in returning the stolen property to them (or in obtaining a proportionate monetary compensation from the guilty). Criminal law plays an important role in protecting property from unlawful encroachment. The task of protecting property from criminal encroachments among the tasks of the criminal law among the tasks of the criminal law. The data of the official statistics of the GIAC of the Russian Interior Ministry clearly show that the prevailing part of the common crimes the theft. At the same time, the largest share is theft in the form of theft. The work on the basis of a comparative approach reveals scientific and practical problems in the field of criminal regulation of liability for theft in the form of theft. Conclusions and suggestions. On the basis of a comparative analysis of the past of the domestic criminal law (on the example of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of 1922) and the modern Russian criminal law (the Russian Criminal Code of 1996 in the current version as of January 2020), legislative proposals for the improvement of Article 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, aimed at improving the effectiveness of the fight against theft in the form of theft, including committed by a group of persons. Practical value. The main provisions of the work can be used in the criminal law training process, in further research work, as well as in legislative activities to further improve the criminal law on liability theft in the form of theft.

Bazarov P.R., (2020), COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LAW REGULATION RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEFT IN THE FORM OF THEFT. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 125-129.

Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchyetom popravok, vnesyennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2014. № 9. St. 851.
Kravtsov R. V., Kuznetsov V. I. K voprosu o priznakakh sostava krazhi chuzhogo imushchestva // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2015. № 4 (71). S. 82-89.
Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii V. V. Putina Federal nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 15 yanvarya 2020 g.: stenogramma // Elektronnyy resurs: URL: http://prezident.org/tekst/stenogramma-poslanija-putina-federalnomu-sobraniyu-15-01-2020.html (data obrashcheniya: 15.01.2020).
Postanovlenie VTSIK ot 1 iyunya 1922 g. O vvedenii v deystvie Ugolovnogo kodeksa RSFSR (vmeste s Ugolovnym kodeksom RSFSR) // Elektronnyy resurs: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 dekabrya 2002 g. № 29 (red. ot 16.05.2017) O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2003. № 2.
Skobina E. A., SHishkina S. A. Nekotorye problemy kvalifikatsii krazhi // Aktual nye voprosy yuridicheskikh nauk: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. CHita, aprel 2018 g.). CHita: Izd-vo Molodoy uchyenyy, 2018. S. 62-68.
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossii: ezhegodnye analitiko-statisticheskie svedeniya GIATS MVD Rossii za 2010-2019 gg. // Ofitsial nyy sayt MVD Rossii, razdel Statistika i analitika // Elektronnyy resurs: URL: https://xn--b1aew.xn--p1ai/ (data obrashcheniya: 16.01.2020).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 27.12.2019) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.

criminal law, protection of property, theft, theft, punishment, group of persons, preliminary collusion.