Features of criminal liability according to age
( Pp. 162-165)
More about authors
Akkaeva Halimat Alievna
Cand.Sci. (Law), Associate professor, Police Colonel, head of the department of special technical disciplines
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia.
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia.
Abstract:
In the process of bringing criminals to criminal responsibility, many circumstances related to the behavior of a person are important. One of the criteria that is essential for the qualification of acts is the age of the offender. Despite the fact that the Russian criminal legislation regulates in sufficient detail the age limits for bringing to responsibility, the question of the need to toughen the responsibility of certain categories of the population is increasingly being raised. So, in the conditions of a large-scale spread of crime among minors, doubts arise about the effectiveness of the existing criminal law norms. Given the fact that minors are the most important link in Russian society and the stability of the state directly depends on them in the future, the spread of unlawful behavior among them is categorically unacceptable. The purpose of this research paper is to analyze the prosecution of minors and identify the features of this process, taking into account their age characteristics in modern realities. The author comes to the conclusion that, despite the significant importance of the age of the offender, at present, the illegal behavior of minors is becoming widespread, who not only clearly understand their own actions, but also take into account the features of their prosecution enshrined in Russian legislation. The orientation of Russian practice towards the upbringing of juvenile offenders and the mitigation of their responsibility leads to the commission of more atrocious crimes and a serious increase in the scale of their activities. Attention is focused on the high degree of preparedness of juvenile criminals due to the availability of materials on illegal activities on the Internet.
How to Cite:
Akkaeva H.A., (2021), FEATURES OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY ACCORDING TO AGE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 162-165.
Reference list:
Abidov R.R. Pravovoe znachenie kategorii vozrast v ugolovnom prave // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2020. № 4. S. 347-350.
Balueva T.V. Vidy ugolovnykh nakazaniy, primenyaemykh v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya (spetsifika i osobennost ikh primeneniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh) // Vektor nauki Tol yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: yuridicheskie nauki. 2018. № 1 (32). S. 10-14.
Borisova E.K. Vozrast kak odin iz priznakov sub ekta prestupleniya // Nauka i obrazovanie segodnya. 2019. № 5 (40). S. 93-94.
Gabaraev A.SH. Osobennosti privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh lits // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. № 2. S. 143-145.
Kim E.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie vozrasta ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v kontekste novellizatsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva // Vestnik YUgorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. № 2 (49). S. 73-78.
Pikin I.V., Tarakanov I.A., Pichugin S.A. Osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya nesovershennoletnikh // Krymskiy nauchnyy vestnik. 2019. № 1 (22). S. 51-57.
Serebrennikova A.V. Prestupleniya v sfere informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: kiberbulling i kibermobbing // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2020. № 2. S. 283-287.
Smanaliev K.N., Sydykova Z.D. Proizvodstvo po delam o detyakh // Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossiyskogo slavyanskogo universiteta. 2020. T. 20. № 11. S. 104-108.
Suturin M.A. Kategoriya quot;vozrast quot; v ugolovnom prave Rossii // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2020. № 2 (89). S. 71-76.
Tengizova ZH.A. Nekotorye voprosy vozrastnoy differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. № 1. S. 104-106.
Balueva T.V. Vidy ugolovnykh nakazaniy, primenyaemykh v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya (spetsifika i osobennost ikh primeneniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh) // Vektor nauki Tol yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: yuridicheskie nauki. 2018. № 1 (32). S. 10-14.
Borisova E.K. Vozrast kak odin iz priznakov sub ekta prestupleniya // Nauka i obrazovanie segodnya. 2019. № 5 (40). S. 93-94.
Gabaraev A.SH. Osobennosti privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh lits // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. № 2. S. 143-145.
Kim E.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie vozrasta ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v kontekste novellizatsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva // Vestnik YUgorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. № 2 (49). S. 73-78.
Pikin I.V., Tarakanov I.A., Pichugin S.A. Osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya nesovershennoletnikh // Krymskiy nauchnyy vestnik. 2019. № 1 (22). S. 51-57.
Serebrennikova A.V. Prestupleniya v sfere informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: kiberbulling i kibermobbing // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2020. № 2. S. 283-287.
Smanaliev K.N., Sydykova Z.D. Proizvodstvo po delam o detyakh // Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossiyskogo slavyanskogo universiteta. 2020. T. 20. № 11. S. 104-108.
Suturin M.A. Kategoriya quot;vozrast quot; v ugolovnom prave Rossii // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2020. № 2 (89). S. 71-76.
Tengizova ZH.A. Nekotorye voprosy vozrastnoy differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. № 1. S. 104-106.
Keywords:
criminal responsibility, minors, juvenile delinquency, Russian criminal legislation.
