A lawyer's manifestation of good faith in the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement in the manner of art. 317.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
( Pp. 79-82)

More about authors
Kovalev Sergey A. aspirant
The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article deals with the issue of the integrity of the lawyer and the correlation of this moral and ethical category with the special procedure for making a judgment in the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement by the suspect, in accordance with the procedure of Chapter 40 and art. 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. In conclusion, recommendations were made.
How to Cite:
Kovalev S.A., (2018), A LAWYER'S MANIFESTATION OF GOOD FAITH IN THE CONCLUSION OF A PRE-TRIAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT IN THE MANNER OF ART. 317.1 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 79-82.
Reference list:
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 29.07.2018 № 229-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2001. № 52 (ch. I). St. 4921.
Federal nyy zakon ot 29.06.2009 N 141-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 29.06.2009. N 26. St. 3139.
Prikaz Genprokuratury RF ot 15.03.2010 N 107 Ob organizatsii raboty po realizatsii polnomochiy prokurora pri zaklyuchenii s podozrevaemymi (obvinyaemymi) dosudebnykh soglasheniy o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnym delam // Zakonnost . N 6. 2010.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17.05.2011 N 60-O11-4 //SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29.10.2014 N 46-APU14-37//SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Belov A.S. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: problemy primeneniya //Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii.2012. № 4 (10). S. 155-158.
Gasparyan N.S. Passivnaya zashchita narushaet prava grazhdan// Pravorub URL: https://pravorub.ru/articles/ 9838.html (data obrashcheniya 18.08.2018).
Zakharova N.V., Napalkov V.S. Institut dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Studencheskiy forum. https://www.scienceforum.ru/2014/762/2859
Ivanov A.A. Teoreticheskie i organizatsionno-pravovye aspekty realizatsii instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse (VAK 12.00.09.). Diss. kand. yur. nauk. - Nizhniy Novgorod. 2013.
Ivanov A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie instituta sdelok o priznanii viny v SSHA // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. № 2(1). S. 282-286.
Kostenko N.S. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve v ugolovnom protsesse (VAK 12.00.09.). Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. - Volgograd. 2013.
Matkina D.V. Konventsial naya forma sudebnogo razbiratel stva (VAK 12.00.09). Diss. kand. yu. nauk. - Orenburg, 2009.
Mironova R. V. Istoricheskie aspekty dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve //Materialy mezhdunarodnoy-nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii molodykh uchenykh, aspirantov, magistrantov i studentov. 2017. S. 269-272.
Parfenov V.N. Obespechenie prav i zakonnykh interesov uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri osobom poryadke sudebnogo razbiratel stva. (VAK 12.00.09.). Diss. kand. yur. nauk. - M. 2010.
Rybalov K.A. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel stva v rossiyskoy Federatsii i problemy ego realizatsii. (VAK 12.00.09.). Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. - M. 2004.
Stoyko N.G., Semukhina O.B. Ugolovnyy protsess v SSHA: ucheb., posobie. - Krasnoyarsk: izd-vo KGU, 2000. S. 117-118.
CHaplygina V.N. Sravnitel no-pravovoy analiz nravstvenno-eticheskikh kategoriy dobrosovestnost i nedobrosovestnost v ugolovno-protsessual nom prave Rossii// Lichnost , pravo, gosudarstvo. ZHurnal. Izd.: Pletnikov V.S. . 2017. № 2. S. 57 - 66.