Problems of Social Security and Protection of Families with Children of Mobilized Citizens
( Pp. 138-145)
More about authors
Natalia V. Letova
Dr.Sci.(Law), Chief Researcher of the Procedural Law Sector
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, Russian Federation
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Abstract: The purpose of the study. The article discusses measures of social assistance and support for mobilized citizens and their families, systematizes the types of benefits that are provided by legislation in relation to this category of citizens, identifies problems of their application in practice, caused, among other things, by the lack of the necessary conceptual apparatus in the field of family relations. The author defines a fundamentally new meaning of the criteria traditionally used for the appointment of social payments, their features are revealed when using the method of situational regulation of social relations in connection with the need to ensure the protection of the rights of mobilized citizens in the shortest possible time.
The article offers an analysis of the measures provided for by the legislation to support the families of the mobilized, their advantages and individual imperfections are revealed, their complex and intersectoral nature is proved, a conclusion is formulated about the practical convergence of public and private interests in ensuring the protection of the rights and interests of mobilized citizens and their families.
The article offers an analysis of the measures provided for by the legislation to support the families of the mobilized, their advantages and individual imperfections are revealed, their complex and intersectoral nature is proved, a conclusion is formulated about the practical convergence of public and private interests in ensuring the protection of the rights and interests of mobilized citizens and their families.
How to Cite:
Natalia V.L., (2023), PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND PROTECTION OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN OF MOBILIZED CITIZENS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 138-145.
Reference list:
Letova N.V. Fundamentals of protection of motherhood, childhood, family in the light of the novels of the Constitution of the Russian Federation // Gaps in Russian legislation. No. 1. 2021. P. 34-40.
Krasheninnikov P.V., Badulina E.V. Support for the institution of the family: constitutional amendments // Family and housing law. 2020. N 4. Р. 19 - 24.
Zenkin S.A. Modernization of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: normative model and practice // Lex russica. 2018. N 11. Р. 40 - 62.
Mikryukov V.A. Analogy of law and analogy of law in the practice of resolving family law disputes. Moscow: Statut, 2021. 164 p.
Vikharev A.A. The contract as a tool for regulating family relations // Russian legal journal. 2017. N 3. Р. 144 - 152.
Savelyeva N.M. Protection of the rights of the debtor in the maintenance obligation of parents and children // Actual problems of Russian law. 2017. N 5. Р. 72 - 77.
Velichkova O.I. Transformation of property of spouses: theoretical aspects and realities of judicial practice // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2019. N 1. Р. 24 - 27.
Chashkova S.Yu. Problems of maintenance obligations of parents and children: private law and public law aspects // Law. 2022. N 1. Р. 46 - 55.
Pyankova A.F. Balance of interests in alimony legal relations // Actual problems of Russian law. 2018. N 1. Р. 77 - 87.
Chimidova E. Commentary to the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of September 21, 2022 N 647 «On the announcement of partial mobilization in the Russian Federation» // Normative acts for an accountant. 2022. N 19. Р. 11 - 13.
Ksenofontova D.S. Legal guarantees in the field of alimony: monograph. M., 2018.
Mikryukov V.A. On the inadmissibility of the analogy of the law in the mechanism of restricting the rights of adoptive parents // Family and housing law. 2020. N 2. Р. 11 – 14.
Soboleva E.A. On tax preferences for mobilized citizens // Payment for labor: accounting and taxation. 2022. N 11. Р. 25 - 32.
Veselov A.V. Commentary to the Federal Law of November 21, 2022 N 443-FZ «On Amendments to Article 4 of Part One, Part Two of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation and Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation» // Normative acts for an accountant. 2022. N 23. Р. 20 - 22.
Bix B. Agreements in Family Law. 2012 // Minnesota Legal Studies Research. Paper N 12-43 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=2125343).
Langenbucher K. Argument by Analogy in European Law // The Cambridge Law Journal. 1998. N 57 (3). P. 481.
Krasheninnikov P.V., Badulina E.V. Support for the institution of the family: constitutional amendments // Family and housing law. 2020. N 4. Р. 19 - 24.
Zenkin S.A. Modernization of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: normative model and practice // Lex russica. 2018. N 11. Р. 40 - 62.
Mikryukov V.A. Analogy of law and analogy of law in the practice of resolving family law disputes. Moscow: Statut, 2021. 164 p.
Vikharev A.A. The contract as a tool for regulating family relations // Russian legal journal. 2017. N 3. Р. 144 - 152.
Savelyeva N.M. Protection of the rights of the debtor in the maintenance obligation of parents and children // Actual problems of Russian law. 2017. N 5. Р. 72 - 77.
Velichkova O.I. Transformation of property of spouses: theoretical aspects and realities of judicial practice // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2019. N 1. Р. 24 - 27.
Chashkova S.Yu. Problems of maintenance obligations of parents and children: private law and public law aspects // Law. 2022. N 1. Р. 46 - 55.
Pyankova A.F. Balance of interests in alimony legal relations // Actual problems of Russian law. 2018. N 1. Р. 77 - 87.
Chimidova E. Commentary to the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of September 21, 2022 N 647 «On the announcement of partial mobilization in the Russian Federation» // Normative acts for an accountant. 2022. N 19. Р. 11 - 13.
Ksenofontova D.S. Legal guarantees in the field of alimony: monograph. M., 2018.
Mikryukov V.A. On the inadmissibility of the analogy of the law in the mechanism of restricting the rights of adoptive parents // Family and housing law. 2020. N 2. Р. 11 – 14.
Soboleva E.A. On tax preferences for mobilized citizens // Payment for labor: accounting and taxation. 2022. N 11. Р. 25 - 32.
Veselov A.V. Commentary to the Federal Law of November 21, 2022 N 443-FZ «On Amendments to Article 4 of Part One, Part Two of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation and Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation» // Normative acts for an accountant. 2022. N 23. Р. 20 - 22.
Bix B. Agreements in Family Law. 2012 // Minnesota Legal Studies Research. Paper N 12-43 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=2125343).
Langenbucher K. Argument by Analogy in European Law // The Cambridge Law Journal. 1998. N 57 (3). P. 481.
Keywords:
state; family policy; social policy; mobilization; mobilized citizens; families of mobilized; social norms; family relations; family composition; family members; types of families; criteria of need; method of regulating family relations; social assistance measures; support measures; benefits of mobilized citizens; obligations of mobilized; protection of mobilized; public and private interests..
Related Articles
