A Unified Register of Expert Methodologies: a Basis for Quality Assurance in Forensic Science and a Verified Resource for Law Enforcement Agencies
( Pp. 422-432)
More about authors
Antilevskaya Julia Alexandrovna
Postgraduate Student, ; lawyer, Federal Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Information and Methodological Center" Moscow, Russian Federation; technical expert, Federal Accreditation Service
Lomonosov Moscow State University; of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare
Moscow, Russian Federation Federal Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Information and Methodological Center" Moscow, Russian Federation Federal Accreditation Service, Moscow, Russian Federation
Lomonosov Moscow State University; of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare
Moscow, Russian Federation Federal Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Information and Methodological Center" Moscow, Russian Federation Federal Accreditation Service, Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Abstract: The article is devoted to the problem of methodological control of forensic activities in the Russian Federation. The author considers the issues of substantiating the unity of methodological protection in state and non-state forensic organizations, suggests ways of making decisions using the mechanisms of protection and quality control of forensic activities in Russia. Certain groups of legal, informational, organizational and related problems related to methodological support. The issues of standardization in the field of forensic science activities and validation of methodological support are considered. The purpose of the study is to develop theoretically and practically significant proposals for the creation of a unified register of expert methods in order to modernize forensic science activities, get rid of scientifically untenable methods. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study is: general scientific methods of cognition - analysis, synthesis and modeling; private scientific methods - forecasting, analogy and comparative legal. Conclusions. It is proposed to create a Unified State Register of Forensic expert techniques on the basis of the digital platform of the Federal Accreditation Service - the Federal State Information System in the Field of Accreditation (FGIS Rosaccreditation) within the framework of the mechanism previously proposed by the author for the accreditation of forensic expert organizations in the national accreditation system of Russia. The scientific and practical significance lies in the proposal, not previously covered in the literature, to create a single verified resource of forensic methods using the algorithms of a digital platform of a supra-departmental body independent of expert organizations that has state powers to accredit organizations in the national accreditation system of Russia, as well as in a number of other offers.
How to Cite:
Antilevskaya J.A. A Unified Register of Expert Methodologies: a Basis for Quality Assurance in Forensic Science and a Verified Resource for Law Enforcement Agencies // Gaps in Russian Legislation. 2023. Vol. 16. №5. Pp. 422-432. (in Russ.). EDN: ZRWUBI
Reference list:
Abdullin R.R. Organizational-legal and methodological support of forensic-expert activity outside state forensic institutions : dissertation ... D. in law : 12.00.12 / Abdullin Ruslan Ramilevich ; [Place of protection: Rostov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation]. - Ufa, 2021. - 224 p.
Antilevskaya Y.A. National system of accreditation of Russia - a legal way to improve domestic forensic expertise // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2022. № 6. P. 264-274.
Antilevskaya J.A. To a question on an urgency of maintenance of quality of expert techniques at the modern stage of development of forensic activity / J.A. Antilevskaya // Scientific school of criminal procedure and criminalistics of the St. Petersburg state university: Materials of XIII-th International conference, St. Petersburg, 24-25 June 2021 / edited by N.P. Kirillova, V.D. Pristanskova N.G. Stoyko, V.Yu. Vol. Part 2. - Moscow: Rusains Limited Liability Company, 2022. - P. 77-84.
Zhizhina M.V. Unification of methodological support as a mandatory component of the institute of forensic examination in the Russian Federation // Theory and practice of forensic examination. - 2018. - № 13(2). P. 81-87.
Zinin A.M., Mailis N.P. Forensic expertise: Textbook. M.: Law and the Law; Yurite Izdat, 2002. P. 45-47.
Ilyina I., Sergeev M., Nelyutskova E. Heuristics in expert activity in the investigation of traffic accidents // World of Transport. - 2018. - Т.16 (№ 1). - P. 218-224.
Kudryashov D.A. Topical issues of complex forensic examinations: a methodological aspect // Bulletin of economic security. - 2020. - № 4. - P. 162-165.
Mailis N.P. Creative approach in solving expert tasks as a pledge of efficiency and quality of forensic examinations // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. - 2017. - № 2. P.71-73.
Miklyaeva O.V. Prospects for interagency harmonization of methodological support of forensic examination // Theory and practice of forensic expertise. - 2014. - № 3(35). P. 164-168.
Nesmianova I.O. To the question of the role of standardization in forensic activities // Bulletin of economic security. - 2020. - № 4. - P. 185-187.
Nefyodov S.N. Report. Technical regulation in forensic activities. // International scientific-practical conference "Actual issues of forensic examination and criminalistics", dedicated to the 100th anniversary of M. V. Saltevsky. // Kharkiv, 2017.
Nefyodov S.N. Validation of forensic examination techniques: basic regulatory documents / S. N. Nefyodov, S. V. Chashchin // Problems of criminology, criminology and forensic examination. - 2015. - № 2(38). P.75-80.
Omelyanyuk G.G., Chesnokova E.V., Bishmanov B.M. Possibilities of using the ILAC-G19:06/2022 guide "Modules in the forensic process" to improve forensic activities // Theory and practice of forensic examination. - 2022. - № 17(3). P. 70-79.
Perepechina I.O. Genetic identification and diagnostics as fields of knowledge integration and differentiation // Bulletin of economic security. - 2022. - № 1. - P. 155-160.
Perepechina I.O. Complex development of issues of forensic genetic identification. D. in medical sciences. Moscow, 2003 - 362 p.
Perepechina I.O. Development of problems of forensic-medical genetic identification // "Black holes" in Russian legislation, 2002. - № 4. - P. 208-258.
Perepechina I.O. System approach to training for teaching criminalistics // Models of teaching criminalistics: history and modernity. Collection of scientific works / Edited by N.P. Yablokov and V.Y. Shepitko. Kh.: Apostil, 2014. P. 188-195.
Perepechina I.O., Pimenov M.G., Kondrashov S.A. Features of forming a database of genetic traits based on automated information systems // Expert Practice. 1996. № 40. P. 3-5.
Piskunova E.V. Problems of forensic-expert activity, common for Russia and other countries of the world. (Review). // Social and humanitarian sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Ser. 4, State and law: Abstract Journal. 2019. №2.
Protkin A. A., Kolyamanov R. A. Requirements for forensic methods // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2012. №3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/trebovaniya-predyavlyaemye-k-metodam-sudebnoy-ekspertizy (access date: 17.11.2022).
Smirnova S.A., Omelyanyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Actual problems of legislative consolidation of forensic innovation in the Russian Federation // Theory and practice of forensic examination. - 2016. № 1(41). - P. 26-35.
Shved A.I. On the role of research and technological components in forensic activity // Crim. - 2016. - № 1 (25). - P.13-17.
Antilevskaya Y.A. National system of accreditation of Russia - a legal way to improve domestic forensic expertise // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2022. № 6. P. 264-274.
Antilevskaya J.A. To a question on an urgency of maintenance of quality of expert techniques at the modern stage of development of forensic activity / J.A. Antilevskaya // Scientific school of criminal procedure and criminalistics of the St. Petersburg state university: Materials of XIII-th International conference, St. Petersburg, 24-25 June 2021 / edited by N.P. Kirillova, V.D. Pristanskova N.G. Stoyko, V.Yu. Vol. Part 2. - Moscow: Rusains Limited Liability Company, 2022. - P. 77-84.
Zhizhina M.V. Unification of methodological support as a mandatory component of the institute of forensic examination in the Russian Federation // Theory and practice of forensic examination. - 2018. - № 13(2). P. 81-87.
Zinin A.M., Mailis N.P. Forensic expertise: Textbook. M.: Law and the Law; Yurite Izdat, 2002. P. 45-47.
Ilyina I., Sergeev M., Nelyutskova E. Heuristics in expert activity in the investigation of traffic accidents // World of Transport. - 2018. - Т.16 (№ 1). - P. 218-224.
Kudryashov D.A. Topical issues of complex forensic examinations: a methodological aspect // Bulletin of economic security. - 2020. - № 4. - P. 162-165.
Mailis N.P. Creative approach in solving expert tasks as a pledge of efficiency and quality of forensic examinations // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. - 2017. - № 2. P.71-73.
Miklyaeva O.V. Prospects for interagency harmonization of methodological support of forensic examination // Theory and practice of forensic expertise. - 2014. - № 3(35). P. 164-168.
Nesmianova I.O. To the question of the role of standardization in forensic activities // Bulletin of economic security. - 2020. - № 4. - P. 185-187.
Nefyodov S.N. Report. Technical regulation in forensic activities. // International scientific-practical conference "Actual issues of forensic examination and criminalistics", dedicated to the 100th anniversary of M. V. Saltevsky. // Kharkiv, 2017.
Nefyodov S.N. Validation of forensic examination techniques: basic regulatory documents / S. N. Nefyodov, S. V. Chashchin // Problems of criminology, criminology and forensic examination. - 2015. - № 2(38). P.75-80.
Omelyanyuk G.G., Chesnokova E.V., Bishmanov B.M. Possibilities of using the ILAC-G19:06/2022 guide "Modules in the forensic process" to improve forensic activities // Theory and practice of forensic examination. - 2022. - № 17(3). P. 70-79.
Perepechina I.O. Genetic identification and diagnostics as fields of knowledge integration and differentiation // Bulletin of economic security. - 2022. - № 1. - P. 155-160.
Perepechina I.O. Complex development of issues of forensic genetic identification. D. in medical sciences. Moscow, 2003 - 362 p.
Perepechina I.O. Development of problems of forensic-medical genetic identification // "Black holes" in Russian legislation, 2002. - № 4. - P. 208-258.
Perepechina I.O. System approach to training for teaching criminalistics // Models of teaching criminalistics: history and modernity. Collection of scientific works / Edited by N.P. Yablokov and V.Y. Shepitko. Kh.: Apostil, 2014. P. 188-195.
Perepechina I.O., Pimenov M.G., Kondrashov S.A. Features of forming a database of genetic traits based on automated information systems // Expert Practice. 1996. № 40. P. 3-5.
Piskunova E.V. Problems of forensic-expert activity, common for Russia and other countries of the world. (Review). // Social and humanitarian sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Ser. 4, State and law: Abstract Journal. 2019. №2.
Protkin A. A., Kolyamanov R. A. Requirements for forensic methods // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2012. №3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/trebovaniya-predyavlyaemye-k-metodam-sudebnoy-ekspertizy (access date: 17.11.2022).
Smirnova S.A., Omelyanyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Actual problems of legislative consolidation of forensic innovation in the Russian Federation // Theory and practice of forensic examination. - 2016. № 1(41). - P. 26-35.
Shved A.I. On the role of research and technological components in forensic activity // Crim. - 2016. - № 1 (25). - P.13-17.
Keywords:
accreditation; validation; methodology; methodological support; national accreditation body; national accreditation system; register; forensic science activities; unification; standardization..
Related Articles
