Mandate and Activities of the Special Rapporteur on the Negative Impact of Unilateral Coercive Measures on the Enjoyment of Human Rights
( Pp. 147-153)
More about authors
Irina V. Shiryova
Associate Professor of the Department of International and Public Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Law Disciplines, ScoupusID: 57195977774
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; MIREA — Russian Technological University
Moscow, Russian Federation; Moscow, Russian Federation
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; MIREA — Russian Technological University
Moscow, Russian Federation; Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article discusses issues related to the mandate and activities of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, sanctions.It is obvious that since the establishment of the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures, there remains a need to extend the activities of this Special Procedure, since further work is required to assess the impact of unilateral coercive measures imposed bypassing the UN Security Council and their consequences on human rights and the achievement of sustainable development goals.
How to Cite:
Shiryova I. V. Mandate and Activities of the Special Rapporteur on the Negative Impact of Unilateral Coercive Measures on the Enjoyment of Human Rights // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2024. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 147-153. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2024-20-2-147-153. EDN: KFRJAS
Reference list:
Douhan A.F. Unilateral Coercive Measures: Notion and Qualification // Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations. 2021. No. 2. pp. 26–48.
Dovgan E.F. Legal aspects of the impact of unilateral coercive measures on the achievement of sustainable Development Goals (Part 1). Право. by. 2022. No. 5 (79). pp. 89–98.
Dovgan E.F. Legal aspects of the impact of unilateral coercive measures on the achievement of sustainable development Goals (Part 2) //Право.by. 2022. No. 6 (80). pp. 127–137.
Douhan A.F. Fundamental human rights and coercive measures: impact and interdependence // Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations. 2017. No. 1. pp. 67–77.
Dovgan E.F. Mechanisms for the protection of human rights in the event of the introduction of unilateral coercive measures in the activities of special mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council Право.by. 2017. No. 5 (49). pp. 124–131.
Keshner M.V. Issues of legitimacy of limitation by countermeasures of the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the state//Journal of Russian Law. 2021. №3. Р. 152–171.
Starzhenetsky V.V., Burykina V.A., Kuritsyna K.S. Russian anti-sanctions regulation: current state and ways of improvement// Law. 2021. No. 3. Р. 119–142.
Dovgan E.F. Legal aspects of the impact of unilateral coercive measures on the achievement of sustainable Development Goals (Part 1). Право. by. 2022. No. 5 (79). pp. 89–98.
Dovgan E.F. Legal aspects of the impact of unilateral coercive measures on the achievement of sustainable development Goals (Part 2) //Право.by. 2022. No. 6 (80). pp. 127–137.
Douhan A.F. Fundamental human rights and coercive measures: impact and interdependence // Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations. 2017. No. 1. pp. 67–77.
Dovgan E.F. Mechanisms for the protection of human rights in the event of the introduction of unilateral coercive measures in the activities of special mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council Право.by. 2017. No. 5 (49). pp. 124–131.
Keshner M.V. Issues of legitimacy of limitation by countermeasures of the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the state//Journal of Russian Law. 2021. №3. Р. 152–171.
Starzhenetsky V.V., Burykina V.A., Kuritsyna K.S. Russian anti-sanctions regulation: current state and ways of improvement// Law. 2021. No. 3. Р. 119–142.
Keywords:
United Nations, human rights, United Nations Human Rights Council, Special procedures, Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights..
