Doctrinal Approaches to the Concept and Content of State-Religious Relations in the Russian and Foreign Legal Literature
( Pp. 217-222)
More about authors
Yury V. Zudov
Cand. Sci. (Hist.), Associate Professor, Department of State and Law History
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Moscow, Russian Federation
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Abstract: The purpose of the research. The article examines doctrinal approaches to the concept and content of state-religious relations in Russian and foreign legal literature. Results. The author identifies three main models of conceptualization of state-religious relations: secularist, theocratic and consensual. The secularist model is based on the principle of institutional and functional separation of the spheres of state and religion. Its supporters insist on the non-interference of the state in the affairs of the church and the non-interference of the church in the affairs of the state. At the same time, the state guarantees the freedom of conscience and religion of citizens, while support for one or another denomination is not provided. The theocratic model assumes that the state should be based on religious principles and values, and religion, in turn, should actively participate in the formation of state policy. Religious and secular legislation are closely intertwined within the framework of this model. The consensual model proceeds from the possibility of coexistence of the state and several faiths on a parity basis, their mutual cooperation with the preservation of autonomy. At the same time, the state guarantees equal rights to all religions, without giving preference to any one of them. The author notes that in modern science there is no single, generally accepted definition of state-religious relations. It has to do with versatility and complexity of the interrelationships between state institutions and religious associations, as well as the difference in ideological and methodological approaches of researchers.
How to Cite:
Zudov Yu.V. Doctrinal Approaches to the Concept and Content of State-Religious Relations in the Russian and Foreign Legal Literature // Gaps in Russian Legislation. 2024. Vol. 17. №3. Pp. 217-222. (in Russ.). EDN: JOKSGD
Reference list:
Мамедова Н. М. Политическая система Исламской Республики Иран: особенности и возможности трансформации // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2018. №3. С. 152-165.
Шайо А. К понятию конституционного секуляризма // СКО. 2009. №2 (69). С. 22-31.
Hick J. A Pluralist View // Four Views on Salvation in a Pluralistic World / D.L. Okholm, T.R. Phillips (eds.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996. P. 29-59.
Петюкова О. Н. Правовые формы отношений советского государства и Русской православной церкви в 1917-1945 годах : дис. … д-ра юрид. наук: 12.00.01/ О.Н. Петюкова. М., 2011.
Mel e ZH. Zaveshchanie / Ioann Mel e (po Vol teru). M.: Ateist, 1924.
Montesk e SH. O dukhe zakonov. M.: Ripol-Klassik, 2018.
Volodina N. V. Pravovye sistemy gosudarstvenno-konfessional nykh otnosheniy. M.: Novyy indeks, 2009.
Mchedlova M. P. Religii v sovremennom obshchestve // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 12. C. 77 84.
D yurem. U. K. Perspektivy religioznoy svobody: sravnitel nyy analiz. M.: Institut religii i prava, 1999.
Alessandro Ferrari. National Identity and Religious Freedom: the Italian Case // Prava cheloveka v Rossii i za rubezhom. M., 2007. S.185-191.
Zyubanov YU. A. KHristianskie osnovy ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sravnitel nyy analiz norm UK RF i Svyashchennogo Pisaniya. M. : YUstina; Prospekt, 2007.
Ovsienko F.G. Politizatsiya konfessiy i klerikalizatsii politiki: tendentsii razvitiya i riski v rossiyskom obshchestve // Religiovedenie. 2002. № 2. S. 20-29.
Abrahamian E. Khomeinism: Essays on the Islamic Republic. London: I. B. Tauris and Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
Mamedova N. M. Politicheskaya sistema Islamskoy Respubliki Iran: osobennosti i vozmozhnosti transformatsii // Kontury global nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2018. №3. S. 152-165.
SHayo A. K ponyatiyu konstitutsionnogo sekulyarizma // SKO. 2009. №2 (69). S. 22-31.
Hick J. A Pluralist View // Four Views on Salvation in a Pluralistic World / D.L. Okholm, T.R. Phillips (eds.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996. P. 29-59.
Petyukova O. N. Pravovye formy otnosheniy sovetskogo gosudarstva i Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi v 1917-1945 godakh : dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.01/ O.N. Petyukova. M., 2011.
Шайо А. К понятию конституционного секуляризма // СКО. 2009. №2 (69). С. 22-31.
Hick J. A Pluralist View // Four Views on Salvation in a Pluralistic World / D.L. Okholm, T.R. Phillips (eds.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996. P. 29-59.
Петюкова О. Н. Правовые формы отношений советского государства и Русской православной церкви в 1917-1945 годах : дис. … д-ра юрид. наук: 12.00.01/ О.Н. Петюкова. М., 2011.
Mel e ZH. Zaveshchanie / Ioann Mel e (po Vol teru). M.: Ateist, 1924.
Montesk e SH. O dukhe zakonov. M.: Ripol-Klassik, 2018.
Volodina N. V. Pravovye sistemy gosudarstvenno-konfessional nykh otnosheniy. M.: Novyy indeks, 2009.
Mchedlova M. P. Religii v sovremennom obshchestve // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 12. C. 77 84.
D yurem. U. K. Perspektivy religioznoy svobody: sravnitel nyy analiz. M.: Institut religii i prava, 1999.
Alessandro Ferrari. National Identity and Religious Freedom: the Italian Case // Prava cheloveka v Rossii i za rubezhom. M., 2007. S.185-191.
Zyubanov YU. A. KHristianskie osnovy ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sravnitel nyy analiz norm UK RF i Svyashchennogo Pisaniya. M. : YUstina; Prospekt, 2007.
Ovsienko F.G. Politizatsiya konfessiy i klerikalizatsii politiki: tendentsii razvitiya i riski v rossiyskom obshchestve // Religiovedenie. 2002. № 2. S. 20-29.
Abrahamian E. Khomeinism: Essays on the Islamic Republic. London: I. B. Tauris and Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
Mamedova N. M. Politicheskaya sistema Islamskoy Respubliki Iran: osobennosti i vozmozhnosti transformatsii // Kontury global nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2018. №3. S. 152-165.
SHayo A. K ponyatiyu konstitutsionnogo sekulyarizma // SKO. 2009. №2 (69). S. 22-31.
Hick J. A Pluralist View // Four Views on Salvation in a Pluralistic World / D.L. Okholm, T.R. Phillips (eds.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996. P. 29-59.
Petyukova O. N. Pravovye formy otnosheniy sovetskogo gosudarstva i Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi v 1917-1945 godakh : dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.01/ O.N. Petyukova. M., 2011.
Keywords:
state, religion, state-religious relations, secularism, theocracy, consensus..
