Current Aspects of Using Administrative Recording of Legal Facts in Tort-Related Legal Relationships
( Pp. 51-60)
More about authors
Mikhail V. Vavilin
Cand. Sci. (Law), Scientific Supervisor, Assoc. Prof.; Moscow Innovation University, Assoc. Prof.; The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Member of the Association of Lawyers of Russia; Member of the Expert Advisory Council, Junior Counselor of Justice
Federation Council Committee of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on Constitutional Legislation and State Building
Moscow, Russian Federation Anton V. Osipenko Director of the multifunctional law center Sphere of Law; The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Moscow, Russian Federation
Federation Council Committee of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on Constitutional Legislation and State Building
Moscow, Russian Federation Anton V. Osipenko Director of the multifunctional law center Sphere of Law; The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Abstract: Purpose of the Study. This article examines the use of administrative records of legal facts in resolving legal disputes. This study continues a series of publications devoted to current issues of recording legal facts in contemporary Russian legal practice. To date, the administrative recording of legal facts remains one of the most understudied methods. The legal framework lacks uniform regulatory requirements for recording legal facts, which complicates proof in civil proceedings, reduces the effectiveness of administrative justice bodies, and leads to problems protecting citizens' rights in court in the event of tortious legal relations. Traditionally, in such cases, citizens turn to the police. The current order of the relevant ministry, dated 2014, regulating the procedure for police investigations of tortious cases, requires updating and supplementation in light of the development of electronic means of recording legal facts. The emerging practice of courts recognizing electronic evidence not recorded by police or certified by notaries is giving rise to a flawed practice that, given the use of artificial intelligence, could lead to evidence falsification in the future. Increasing the cost of expert examinations confirming the authenticity of electronic evidence presented to the court will undoubtedly increase legal costs. Conclusions. This article substantiates the importance of the administrative form of recording legal facts in tort-related legal relationships and identifies its specific features. This form of recording legal facts is characterized by established procedural regulations and the ability to be identified in departmental document management systems. It provides the basis for criminal, administrative, and civil liability, making it one of the most effective and recognized by the courts.
How to Cite:
Vavilin, M.V., Osipenko, A.V. (2026). Current Aspects of Using Administrative Recording of Legal Facts in Tort-Related Legal Relationships. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 19(3), 51-60. DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2026-19-3-51-60. EDN: UJIORQ
Reference list:
Rieckers O., Spindler G. Den Haag. Tort law in Germany: Kluwer Law International, 2019. 1 online resource (152 p.ges).
Zhang J. Modes of Regulation in the Intermediate Field Between Contract Law and Tort Law: A Chinese Law Perspective. Springer, 2023.
Бакирова Д.М. Концептуальные основы общей теории юрид. фактов: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 5.1.1. / [Место защиты: ФГАОУ ВО «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет»; Диссовет БелГУ.22.07]. Белгород, 2023. 199 с.
Воронин А.Е. Юридические факты-события в российском праве: общетеоретический анализ: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.01; [Место защиты: Владимир. юрид. ин-т Федер. службы исполнения наказаний]. Владимир, 2008. 191 с.
Красавчиков О.А. Теория юрид. фактов в советском гражданском праве: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.00. Свердловск, 1950. 302 с.
Маменкова А.А. Пределы деликтной ответственности (проблема чисто экономического вреда) / Москва: [б. и.], 2018. 17 с.
Bakirova D.M. Kontseptual nye osnovy obshchey teorii yurid. faktov: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 5.1.1. / Mesto zashchity: FGAOU VO Belgorodskiy gosudarstvennyy natsional nyy issledovatel skiy universitet ; Dissovet BelGU.22.07 . Belgorod, 2023. 199 s.
Voronin A.E. YUridicheskie fakty- sobytiya v rossiyskom prave: obshcheteoreticheskiy analiz: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01; Mesto zashchity: Vladimir. yurid. in-t Feder. sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy . Vladimir, 2008. 191 s.
Krasavchikov O.A. Teoriya yurid. faktov v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.00. Sverdlovsk, 1950. 302 s.
Mamenkova A.A. Predely deliktnoy otvetstvennosti (problema chisto ekonomicheskogo vreda) / Moskva: b. i. , 2018. 17 s.
Zhang J. Modes of Regulation in the Intermediate Field Between Contract Law and Tort Law: A Chinese Law Perspective. Springer, 2023.
Бакирова Д.М. Концептуальные основы общей теории юрид. фактов: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 5.1.1. / [Место защиты: ФГАОУ ВО «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет»; Диссовет БелГУ.22.07]. Белгород, 2023. 199 с.
Воронин А.Е. Юридические факты-события в российском праве: общетеоретический анализ: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.01; [Место защиты: Владимир. юрид. ин-т Федер. службы исполнения наказаний]. Владимир, 2008. 191 с.
Красавчиков О.А. Теория юрид. фактов в советском гражданском праве: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.00. Свердловск, 1950. 302 с.
Маменкова А.А. Пределы деликтной ответственности (проблема чисто экономического вреда) / Москва: [б. и.], 2018. 17 с.
Bakirova D.M. Kontseptual nye osnovy obshchey teorii yurid. faktov: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 5.1.1. / Mesto zashchity: FGAOU VO Belgorodskiy gosudarstvennyy natsional nyy issledovatel skiy universitet ; Dissovet BelGU.22.07 . Belgorod, 2023. 199 s.
Voronin A.E. YUridicheskie fakty- sobytiya v rossiyskom prave: obshcheteoreticheskiy analiz: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01; Mesto zashchity: Vladimir. yurid. in-t Feder. sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy . Vladimir, 2008. 191 s.
Krasavchikov O.A. Teoriya yurid. faktov v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.00. Sverdlovsk, 1950. 302 s.
Mamenkova A.A. Predely deliktnoy otvetstvennosti (problema chisto ekonomicheskogo vreda) / Moskva: b. i. , 2018. 17 s.
Keywords:
recording legal facts, police, administrative-legal activities, tort, material damage, verification of reports of crimes and offenses, resolution, protocol.
