Theoretical and Legal Foundations of the Principle of Freedom of Contract
( Pp. 234-239)
More about authors
Alexey I. Rakhmatullaev
Postgraduate student; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Moscow, Russian Federation; leading expert in the Department of Public Procurement Appeals; Moscow Office of the Federal Antimonopoly Service; Moscow, Russian Federation
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации; Управление Федеральной антимонопольной службы по г. Москве
г. Москва, Российская Федерация; г. Москва, Российская Федерация Alexander A. Bastrikov Cand. Sci. (Law); Head of the Legal Department;
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Global Service Group Academy LLC;
Moscow, Russian Federation
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации; Управление Федеральной антимонопольной службы по г. Москве
г. Москва, Российская Федерация; г. Москва, Российская Федерация Alexander A. Bastrikov Cand. Sci. (Law); Head of the Legal Department;
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Global Service Group Academy LLC;
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The aim of this study is to comprehensively analyze the theoretical and legal foundations of the principle of freedom of contract in the Russian legal system through the prism of philosophical, constitutional, and civil law approaches. The article examines the philosophical and legal foundations of freedom of contract, tracing back to the concepts of Immanuel Kant and Bernard Spinoza, where reason is the determining factor in the boundaries of the autonomy of the will. It analyzes the constitutional and legal dimension of contractual freedom as a balance between the liberal concept of autonomy and the social dimension of constitutionalism in the context of structural inequality of bargaining power. The article examines the implementation of the principle of freedom of contract in civil transactions through a discretionary regulatory method, including the equality of parties, autonomy of will, and property independence. Particular attention is paid to the transformation of contractual relations under the influence of the digitalization of the economy, which has given rise to new forms of information and power asymmetry. This article examines the institutional boundaries of freedom of will, defined by imperative norms, requirements of good faith, and the protection of public interests. It also analyzes case law demonstrating the transition from formal equality to substantive justice through the development of the doctrine of unfair contractual terms. The author concludes that the principle of freedom of contract is a dynamic institution structured by three components: procedural autonomy in contract formation, substantive autonomy in determining the content, and the dynamic adaptability of obligations. The functional purpose of this principle is to ensure a balance between private initiative and public interests, legal certainty, and adaptability to economic challenges in the context of the digital transformation of civil transactions.
How to Cite:
Rakhmatullaev, A.I., Bastrikov, A.A. (2025). Theoretical and legal foundations of the principle of freedom of contract. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 21(6), 234-239. DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-6-234-239. EDN: JWCDOD
Reference list:
Alekseeva N.I., Botantsova L.V. Theoretical Problems of Legal Equality as Principles and the Law of Categories. Obrazovanie i Pravo. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 84–88. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.24412/2076-1503-2023-2-84-88. EDN: FEICHL.
Bagadenko M.O., Shcherbakov A.V. Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT Principles): Legal Nature and Application Features. Epomen. 2021. No. 52. Pp. 76–82. (In Rus.).
Belyaeva O.A. State Defense Order: Aspects with the Emergence of Terms of the Agreement on Relevant Transactions. Lex Russica. 2025. Vol. 78, No. 10. Pp. 9–20. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2025.227.10.009-020.
Zhernovnikova P.S. The Concept and Forms of Expression of Will in Russian Civil Law. Monitoring of Law Enforcement. 2025. No. 1 (54). Pp. 19–23. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.24412/2226-0692-2025-1-19-23.
Crisis Phenomena in Law: Theory, History, and Ways to Overcome Them: A Collective Monograph / compiled and edited by A. A. Dorskaya, V. A. Kosovskaya, N. I. Alekseeva. Saint Petersburg: Asterion, 2021. 580 p. ISBN 978-5-00188-121-6. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.53115/9785001881216.
Krupin K.D. The Relationship between the Principles of Freedom of Contract and «Everything That Is Not Prohibited Is Permitted». Law and Management. 2024. No. 4. Pp. 155–158. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.24412/2224-9133-2024-4-155-158.
Lovchikova Yu.V. The Principle of Freedom of Contract in Civil Law: Features and Limits. Electronic Supplement to the Russian Law Journal. 2021. No. 4. Pp. 76–81. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.34076/22196838_2021_4_76.
Malla M. Free Will in Spinoza: The Concept of Evolution. Kant. 2024. No. 4 (53). Pp. 258–265. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.24923/2222-243X.2024-53.39.
Medushevsky A.N. Global Constitutionalism — Theory of World Legal Order or a New Political Ideology? Historia Provinciae — Journal of Regional History. 2020. Vol. 4, No. 3. Pp. 974–1019. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.23859/2587-8344-2020-4-3-8.
Svirin Yu.A. The Category of «Discretion» in Civil and Civil Procedural Law. Legal Culture of Law Enforcement. 2021. Pp. 1–9. (In Rus.). EDN: KGMFMK.
Khutina E.Sh. Civil-Law Contract as a Universal Means of Legal Regulation of Social Relations. Scientific and Practical Journal «Dialogue». 2025. No. 3 (33). P. 2. (In Rus.).
Shchemek M.Ya. Freedom, Law, Justice. Kant's Practical Philosophy and Political Modernity. Science. Art. Culture. 2023. No. 2 (38). Pp. 134–152. (In Rus.). EDN: XBGKGY.
Bagadenko M.O., Shcherbakov A.V. Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT Principles): Legal Nature and Application Features. Epomen. 2021. No. 52. Pp. 76–82. (In Rus.).
Belyaeva O.A. State Defense Order: Aspects with the Emergence of Terms of the Agreement on Relevant Transactions. Lex Russica. 2025. Vol. 78, No. 10. Pp. 9–20. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2025.227.10.009-020.
Zhernovnikova P.S. The Concept and Forms of Expression of Will in Russian Civil Law. Monitoring of Law Enforcement. 2025. No. 1 (54). Pp. 19–23. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.24412/2226-0692-2025-1-19-23.
Crisis Phenomena in Law: Theory, History, and Ways to Overcome Them: A Collective Monograph / compiled and edited by A. A. Dorskaya, V. A. Kosovskaya, N. I. Alekseeva. Saint Petersburg: Asterion, 2021. 580 p. ISBN 978-5-00188-121-6. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.53115/9785001881216.
Krupin K.D. The Relationship between the Principles of Freedom of Contract and «Everything That Is Not Prohibited Is Permitted». Law and Management. 2024. No. 4. Pp. 155–158. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.24412/2224-9133-2024-4-155-158.
Lovchikova Yu.V. The Principle of Freedom of Contract in Civil Law: Features and Limits. Electronic Supplement to the Russian Law Journal. 2021. No. 4. Pp. 76–81. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.34076/22196838_2021_4_76.
Malla M. Free Will in Spinoza: The Concept of Evolution. Kant. 2024. No. 4 (53). Pp. 258–265. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.24923/2222-243X.2024-53.39.
Medushevsky A.N. Global Constitutionalism — Theory of World Legal Order or a New Political Ideology? Historia Provinciae — Journal of Regional History. 2020. Vol. 4, No. 3. Pp. 974–1019. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.23859/2587-8344-2020-4-3-8.
Svirin Yu.A. The Category of «Discretion» in Civil and Civil Procedural Law. Legal Culture of Law Enforcement. 2021. Pp. 1–9. (In Rus.). EDN: KGMFMK.
Khutina E.Sh. Civil-Law Contract as a Universal Means of Legal Regulation of Social Relations. Scientific and Practical Journal «Dialogue». 2025. No. 3 (33). P. 2. (In Rus.).
Shchemek M.Ya. Freedom, Law, Justice. Kant's Practical Philosophy and Political Modernity. Science. Art. Culture. 2023. No. 2 (38). Pp. 134–152. (In Rus.). EDN: XBGKGY.
Keywords:
freedom of contract, autonomy of will, civil law, contractual relations, constitutionalism, digitalization, good faith, imperative norms..
