The Fundamental Principles of the Criminal Process in Concluding a Pre-trial Cooperation Agreement and Transactions with Justice on the Example of the Russian Federation and the United States
( Pp. 103-108)

More about authors
Dina Y. Moskovskikh
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The purpose of the study: The article examines one of the topical issues of criminal procedural activity—compliance with the fundamental principles of criminal procedure both when concluding a pre–trial cooperation agreement under the legislation of the Russian Federation and when concluding transactions with justice, plea bargaining under US law. This is necessary to determine their impact on improving the efficiency of the criminal process, or rather, the effectiveness of justice in general. Results: The author identified groups of principles involved in the proceedings in cases with a concluded pre-trial cooperation agreement (on the example of the Russian Federation), as well as plea bargaining (on the example of the United States). The value of the principles lies in strict adherence to legal procedure. Attention is focused on the relationship between the implementation of the principles and the relevance of the analyzed procedures to simplified, alternative ways of considering criminal cases. The study made it possible to justify the permissible restriction of their use in criminal proceedings, as well as the impact on the effectiveness of justice in general. One of the conclusions is the achievement of not only quantitative, but also qualitative indicators of criminal procedural activity. For these purposes, it is proposed to strengthen the role of a lawyer when deciding on the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement.
How to Cite:
Moskovskikh D. Yu. The Fundamental Principles of the Criminal Process in Concluding a Pre-trial Cooperation Agreement and Transactions with Justice on the Example of the Russian Federation and the United States // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2023. Vol. 19. № 5. P. 103-108. (in Russ.) EDN: LJYEUI
Reference list:
Cassation ruling of the Seventh Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction of 17.03.2020 in case N 77-229/2020 // SPS Consultant-plus
Report of the American Bar Association, August, 2023 [Electronic resource] // Access mode: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/criminaljustice/plea-bargain-tf-report.pdf (date of application: 10.10.2023).
Statistical Tables For The Federal Judiciary 31.12.2022 [Electronic resource] // Access mode: https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics/table/d-4/statistical-tables-federal-judiciary/2022/12/31 (date of application: 10.10.2023).
Criminal rules of the State of Alaska dated 12.12.2019 [Electronic resource] // Access mode: https://www.akd.uscourts.gov/sites/akd/files/local_rules/Local_Criminal_Rules_12-2020.pdf (date of application: 10.10.2023).
Federal Rules of criminal procedure [Electronic resource] // Access mode: https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/federal_rules_of_criminal_procedure_december_1_2022_0.pdf (date of application: 10.10.2023).
Bakhnovsky, A.V. «Deal with justice»: features of the Anglo-Saxon and continental legal tradition // dissertation ... Candidate of Legal Sciences : 12.00.01 / Alexander Viktorovich Bakhnovsky; Kuban State University. —Krasnodar, 2008. —172 p.
Bednyakov I.L. Razveikina N.A. Category «efficiency» in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of Samara State University. 2014 No. 11-2 (122). pp. 193–198.
Zaitseva, L.L. About improving the efficiency of justice by optimizing criminal procedural procedures / L.L. Zaitseva // Law and democracy : collection of scientific papers / Editorial Board: V.N. Bibilo (Editor-in-chief) [and others]. —Minsk: BSU, 2014. —Issue 25. —pp. 258–286.
Kaigorodova Yu.E., Suvorova A.A. The significance of a pre-trial agreement on cooperation in the implementation of the principles of criminal proceedings // Siberian Legal Review. 2011 No. 15, pp. 54–57.
Stoiko, N.G., Semukhina O.B. Criminal procedure in the USA: textbook / Krasnoyarsk State University. Krasnoyarsk, 2000. 315 p.
Judicial power/edited by I.L. Petrukhin. M., 2003. pp. 295–296.
Foynitsky I.L. Course of criminal proceedings: in 2 vols. St. Petersburg, 1896 Vol. 1. P. 10.
Robert L. Bing. Plea bargaining in the USA.2017 [Electronic resource] // Access mode: https://lawi.us/plea-bargaining/#Plea_Bargaining_in_the_context_of_Juvenile_and_Family_Law, с. 3 (date of application: 10.10.2023).
Russell D. Covey. Toward a More Comprehensive Plea Bargaining Regulatory Regime (2023). Oregon Law Review, Vol. 101, 2023, Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming, [Electronic resource] // Access mode: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4568289 (date of application: 10.10.2023).
Keywords:
deal with justice, plea bargain, pre-trial cooperation agreement, principles of criminal procedure..


Related Articles

New Solutions in Law-making Pages: 80-85 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2021-11-3-80-85 Issue №19072
Plea Deals or pre-Trial Cooperation Agreements: A Comparative View of Japan’s New Institution of Criminal Procedure Law
plea bargain prosecutor defense party witness conciliation proceedings
Show more
4. CRIMINAL LAW Pages: 120-130 Issue №20339
Actual Problems of Investigation of Illegal Banking Activities Committed by Organized Groups and Criminal Associations
illegal banking activities investigation criminal community pre-trial cooperation agreement
Show more
8. Criminal procedure Pages: 178-181 Issue №15895
CORRUPTION CRIMES: SOME PROBLEMS OF DISCLOSURE AND INVESTIGATION
corruption detection of crimes investigation of crimes corruption-related crimes prevention of corruption offenses
Show more