Transparency of Justice and Information Technology
( Pp. 85-93)

Abstract: Digital technologies and artificial intelligence (hereinafter referred to as AI) are increasingly being applied in judicial proceedings in various countries. The technologization of judicial processes significantly enhances their efficiency. It is noted that the idea of integrating AI technologies into the Russian judicial system is currently only at the stage of conceptualizing the problem.
The author analyzes the issue of judicial transparency in relation to the opacity of AI. The benefits of using AI in automating judicial processes are considered: automated case distribution among judges, automatic minute-taking of court sessions, which fully records the course and results of proceedings, and online broadcasting of court sessions. These benefits correlate with judicial transparency, making justice more predictable, fair, consistent, understandable, and explainable. The need to "seal" AI in judicial processes from external (non-regulatory) influences with appropriate system certification is emphasized. Issues related to predictable law and the competitiveness of judges with AI are explored.
The problems of technologizing the domestic judicial system are noted, including the selection of judicial and other acts for subsequent machine learning, their digitization, as well as staffing for this activity, technical equipment, and funding.
The author concludes that the demand for integrating AI into the Russian judicial system should come from the state, represented by a qualified contracting authority.

Papysheva E.S. Transparency of Justice and Information Technology // Gaps in Russian Legislation. 2024. Vol. 17. №5. Pp. 085-093. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2024-17-5-085-093. EDN: JXRSPG

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Klijn, A. (2015). The effects of judicial transparency on public trust: Evidence from a field experiment. Public Administration, 93(4), 995-1011.
Golovko L.V. Gosudarstvo i ego ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo: monografiya. M.:Izdatel skty dom Gorodets 2022. 464 s.
Eskaraev A.N. Privetstvennoe slovo. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno prakticheskoy konferentsii Iskusstvennyy intellekt i bol shie dannye (BIG DATA) v sudebnoy i pravookhranitel noy sisteme: realii i trebovaniya vremeni . Astana 2023. S.13-14.
Kartashov I.I., Kartashov I.I. Iskusstvennyy intellekt: ugolovno pravovoy i protsessual nyy aspekty //Aktual nye problemy gosudarstva i prava. 2021. T.5. №17 Material noe pravo. S.75-88.
Kolokolov N.A. Elektronnye vesy pravosudiya nashe budushchee // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2020. № 11.S. 61 64.
Maslov I.V. Otzyv na monografiyu doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora Alikperova KHanlara Dzhafarovicha Elektronnaya tekhnologiya opredeleniya mery nakazaniya ( Elektronnye vesy pravosudiya ) // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2020. № 11. S.55-60.
Mergaliev A. Privetstvennoe slovo. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno prakticheskoy konferentsii Iskusstvennyy intellekt i bol shie dannye (BIG DATA) v sudebnoy i pravookhranitel noy sisteme: realii i trebovaniya vremeni . Astana 2023. S.7-9.
Momotov V.V. Sudoproizvodstvo v Rossii v usloviyakh novykh tsifrovykh tekhnologiy. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno prakticheskoy konferentsii Iskusstvennyy intellekt i bol shie dannye (BIG DATA) v sudebnoy i pravookhranitel noy sisteme: realii i trebovaniya vremeni . Astana 2023. S.267-271.
Papysheva E.S. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i printsipy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: problemy sovmestimosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2022. №5. S.430-436 DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2022-15-5-430-436.
Papysheva E.S. Predely dopustimosti uchastiya iskusstvennogo intellekta v postanovlenii prigovora//Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. №5 2023 g. S. 386-392 DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2023-16-5-386-391.
Polyakov M.P. Dokazatel stva i tsifropis v ugolovnom protsesse: ozhidanie volshebstva. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2020. №1 (49). S. 229-231.
Polyakov. S.B. Nashe mnenie: tol ko iskusstvennyy intellekt prinudit sud yu k spravedlivosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2021 №3. S.213-218.
Polyakov S.B., Gilev I.A. Slova i dela tsifrovizatsii prav // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2023. №1 (148). S.85-96.
Salikhov Z.M., Bagautdinov F.N. Avtomatizirovannoe raspredelenie ugolovnykh del v sude:rabota i problemy sistemy Ugolovnyy protsess. 2020, №6. S.84-90.
KHaritonova YU.S., YAn T. Pravovye problemy transformatsii osnovnykh nachal pravosudiya v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii tsivilisticheskogo protsessa v Rossii i Kitae // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2023 №1 Konsul tantPlyus.
TSvetkov YU.A. Iskusstvennyy intellekt v pravosudii // Zakon , 2021 №4; S.91-107 Konsul tant Plyus.
Finder, S. (2019). China apos;s Translucent Judicial Transparency. J. Comp. L., 14, 222.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Klijn, A. (2015). The effects of judicial transparency on public trust: Evidence from a field experiment. Public Administration, 93(4), 995-1011.

automation of justice, artificial intelligence, competitiveness of judges, training of artificial intelligence, online broadcasting..