«Accessory» as a Category in the Theory of Law
( Pp. 19-22)

The article examines the general theoretical aspects of the formation of accessorism in private and public law. There are signs of accessory in the branches of law, the author tries to give a general theoretical concept of «Accessory». This article will be useful to supplement the theoretical material in the knowledge of accessory, for example, teaching the institute of accessory obligations in the master's degree. Since this institution, in the fair opinion of E.N. Fetsenko: «... cannot be considered sufficiently developed, since in domestic law, named security obligations were mainly studied.», and therefore it should be recognized that for a full understanding of the theory of «Accessory», its comprehensive study is necessary, not only at the level of translation of the term from Latin and reasoning in a narrowly developed civil direction, but also an understanding of accessory based on its historical development and the peculiarities of its reception in Russian law. Based on the study of these postulates. Most of the research works concerning accessorism have a narrowly sectoral (private law or criminal law) approach, despite the fact that there are no studies substantiating that accessorism is a legal institution. Or maybe it's a legal concept or a legal construction. Judicial practice has gone even further: courts actively refer to the accessory nature of the obligation, primarily security, while the property of accessory is not fixed and is not disclosed. It turns out that the property of accessory is applied, intuitively, only by indirect signs of accessory (additional (dependent accessory) character in relation to the provided one), which is not permissible, since the terminology used in the administration of justice must be verified in terms of its formal and legal certainty. Hence, it can be assumed that accessorism is used as a legal instrument. Therefore, the correct understanding of accessory as a legal category is especially important.

Trukhan R. P. «Accessory» as a Category in the Theory of Law // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2023. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 19-22. (in Russ.) EDN: USMDPM

Vienna Convention on the Law of International Treaties (Concluded in Vienna on May 23, 1969) // Bulletin of the USSR Armed Forces. 1986. Nо 37. Art. 772.
Resolution of the Seventh Arbitration Court of Appeal dated November 17, 2015 No. 07AP-11268/2015 in case No. A45-17966/2015 // ATP Consultant Plus.
Resolution of the Nineteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated March 23, 2012 No. А36-1559/2011 // ATP Consultant Plus.
Burkova A.Yu. Accessory obligations // Bulletin of Arbitration Practice. 2012. N 2. P. 39–45.
Gongalo B.M. The doctrine of securing obligations. M.: Statut, 2002. P. 34.
Evseeva L.A., Trukhan R.P. On the improvement of the legislation of the Russian Federation regulating accessory obligations. North Caucasian legal bulletin. 2020. No. 1. P. 119.
Zykov S.V. Parental rights to determine the place of residence of the child and the procedure for communicating with him: problems of theory and practice, the journal «Actual problems of Russian law», No. 3, March 2022 // SPS «Consultant Plus».
Andrey Vladimirovich Kulakov, Alexandra Yurievna Bolotina. The concept and problems of the legal nature of complicity in a crime // Bulletin of the Samara Law Institute. 2021. No. 5 (46). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-i-problemy-pravovoy-prirody-souchastiya-v-prestuplenii (Date of access: 05/03/2023).
International private law: foreign legislation / A.N. Zhiltsov, A.I. Muranov. M.: Statut, 2001, 892 p.
Nadtochiy I.O., Trukhan R.P. The emergence of the category «accessory» and the historical features of its reception in Russian civil law // Legal Research. 2021. No. 5. DOI: 10.25136/24097136.2021.5.35572 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=35572 (Date of access: 05/02/2023).
Pushkin A. Principles of accessory and independent responsibility of accomplices in crimes // Legitimacy. 2001. No. 3. P. 27–30.
Roman and modern criminal law. / Boyko A.I. «: Legal Center Press; Saint Petersburg; 2003, p. 86.
Trukhan R.P., Nadtochiy S.O. On the issue of additional («Quasi-Accessory») obligations in international law // Law and State: Theory and Practice. 2022. No. 7. P. 50–53.
Torkin D.A. Disadvantages of the accessory property of securing obligations // Lawyer. 2005. No. 7. P. 43.
Fetsenko E.N. Methods and features of teaching in the magistracy of the Institute of Accessory Obligations // Education and Law. 2013. No. 5 (45). pp. 55–65.
Frolov A.I. Accessory as an effect of the functional derivative of a civil legal relationship. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Right. 2018. No. 29 P. 193 DOI: 10.17223/22253513/29/18 (Date of access: 02.05.2023).

Law, relations, obligation, theory, history, law, norm, accessory state, regulation..