The Preclusive Effect of Characterizing Taxpayer Actions as Abuse of Rights (Based on Civil Law Disputes)
( Pp. 42-49)
Abstract:
Abstract: This article is devoted to the analysis of the peculiarities of the new preclusive effect of establishing the fact of abuse of rights in the actions of a taxpayer. The preclusive nature of this fact lies in the circumstance that its establishment within the framework of one dispute considered by an arbitration court, or qualified by a tax authority following a tax audit, allows for a special qualification of the taxpayer’s actions already within the framework of another dispute considered by an arbitration court. The purpose of the research was to provide a consistent analysis of the prerequisites and justification for building inverse relationships between the branches of tax and civil law. As a result of the conducted analysis, the author concludes that this approach contradicts the fundamental foundations of the two branches of law regulating different aspects thereof, as well as the previously established approaches in judicial practice and the direct requirements of the applicable law. At the same time, it appears that, based on the essence of the problem under consideration and the essence of the category of abuse of rights both in tax and civil legal relations, the analyzed approach can be changed at the level of judicial practice and does not require amendments to existing regulatory legal acts.
How to Cite:
Mulko, D.O. (2026). The Preclusive Effect of Characterizing Taxpayer Actions as Abuse of Rights (Based on Civil Law Disputes). Gaps in Russian Legislation, 19(1), 42-49. DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2026-19-1-42-49. EDN: HXYNFI
Reference list:
Hesselink M.W. The Concept of Good Faith // Towards a European Civil Code / A.S. Hartkamp, M.W. Hesselink, E.H. Hondius et al. (eds). 4th ed. The Hague London Boston, 2010. с. 619–649.
Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie Germanii: Vvodnyy zakon k Grazhdanskomu ulozheniyu. 4-e izd., pererab. M.: Infotropik Media, 2015. 715 S.
Deklaratsiya prav cheloveka i grazhdanina, priyataya Natsional nym Sobraniem 26.09.1789 Teksty vazhneyshikh osnovnykh zakonov inostrannykh gosudarstv. M., 1905. CH. 1. 117 S.
Zelentsov A.B., Nemytina M.V. Publichnye interesy i proizvodnye ot nikh yuridicheskie konstruktsii // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: YUridicheskie nauki. 2018. T. 22. № 4. S. 425 462.
Karaseva M.V. Kompensatsionnaya svyaz nalogovogo i grazhdanskogo prava // Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Pravo. 2021. № 1, S. 188 197.
Miloserdov N.A. Publichnye interesy v prave: ponyatie i soderzhanie // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2021. T. 16. № 10. S. 202 211.
Nepranov R.G., Voskoboynikova S.A.. Zloupotreblenie protsessual nymi pravami v grazhdanskom protsesse // Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020. № 23 3 (101).
Pepelyaev S.G., Nalogovoe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. S.G. Pepelyaeva. M.: Pepelyaev Grupp, 2020, S. 721.
Sentsova M.V. Grazhdanskoe i nalogovoe pravo: vice versa // Pravoprimenenie. 2020. № 1, S. 65 73.
Tereshchenko T.A. Vliyanie antikrizisnykh mer na pravoprimenenie: konflikty kvalifikatsiy // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2024. N 4. S. 78 88.
Treushnikov M.K. Grazhdanskiy protsess: uchebnik / V.V. Argunov, E.A. Borisova, N.S. Bocharova i dr.; pod red. M.K. Treushnikova. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Statut, 2014. 960 s.
Sdelki, predstavitel stvo, iskovaya davnost : postateynyy kommentariy k stat yam 153 208 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii / V.V. Baybak, R.S. Bevzenko, S.L. Budylin i dr.; otv. red. A.G. Karapetov. M.: M-Logos, 2018. Elektronnoe izdanie. Redaktsiya 1.0 1264.
KHvostov V.M. Sistema rimskogo prava. Uchebnik /Vstupitel naya stat ya: Sukhanov E.A., Tomsinov V.A. M.: Izdatel stvo Spark , 1996.
YArkov V.V. Arbitrazhnyy protsess: Uchebnik / A.V. Absalyamov, D.B. Abushenko, K.L. Branovitskiy i dr.; otv. red. V.V. YArkov. 7-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Statut, 2017. 752 s.
Gosh J.K.C. Key Ideas in Tax Law. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024. 185 p.
Hesselink M.W. The Concept of Good Faith // Towards a European Civil Code / A.S. Hartkamp, M.W. Hesselink, E.H. Hondius et al. (eds). 4th ed. The Hague London Boston, 2010. s. 619 649.
Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie Germanii: Vvodnyy zakon k Grazhdanskomu ulozheniyu. 4-e izd., pererab. M.: Infotropik Media, 2015. 715 S.
Deklaratsiya prav cheloveka i grazhdanina, priyataya Natsional nym Sobraniem 26.09.1789 Teksty vazhneyshikh osnovnykh zakonov inostrannykh gosudarstv. M., 1905. CH. 1. 117 S.
Zelentsov A.B., Nemytina M.V. Publichnye interesy i proizvodnye ot nikh yuridicheskie konstruktsii // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: YUridicheskie nauki. 2018. T. 22. № 4. S. 425 462.
Karaseva M.V. Kompensatsionnaya svyaz nalogovogo i grazhdanskogo prava // Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Pravo. 2021. № 1, S. 188 197.
Miloserdov N.A. Publichnye interesy v prave: ponyatie i soderzhanie // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2021. T. 16. № 10. S. 202 211.
Nepranov R.G., Voskoboynikova S.A.. Zloupotreblenie protsessual nymi pravami v grazhdanskom protsesse // Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020. № 23 3 (101).
Pepelyaev S.G., Nalogovoe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. S.G. Pepelyaeva. M.: Pepelyaev Grupp, 2020, S. 721.
Sentsova M.V. Grazhdanskoe i nalogovoe pravo: vice versa // Pravoprimenenie. 2020. № 1, S. 65 73.
Tereshchenko T.A. Vliyanie antikrizisnykh mer na pravoprimenenie: konflikty kvalifikatsiy // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2024. N 4. S. 78 88.
Treushnikov M.K. Grazhdanskiy protsess: uchebnik / V.V. Argunov, E.A. Borisova, N.S. Bocharova i dr.; pod red. M.K. Treushnikova. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Statut, 2014. 960 s.
Sdelki, predstavitel stvo, iskovaya davnost : postateynyy kommentariy k stat yam 153 208 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii / V.V. Baybak, R.S. Bevzenko, S.L. Budylin i dr.; otv. red. A.G. Karapetov. M.: M-Logos, 2018. Elektronnoe izdanie. Redaktsiya 1.0 1264.
KHvostov V.M. Sistema rimskogo prava. Uchebnik /Vstupitel naya stat ya: Sukhanov E.A., Tomsinov V.A. M.: Izdatel stvo Spark , 1996.
YArkov V.V. Arbitrazhnyy protsess: Uchebnik / A.V. Absalyamov, D.B. Abushenko, K.L. Branovitskiy i dr.; otv. red. V.V. YArkov. 7-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Statut, 2017. 752 s.
Gosh J.K.C. Key Ideas in Tax Law. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024. 185 p.
Hesselink M.W. The Concept of Good Faith // Towards a European Civil Code / A.S. Hartkamp, M.W. Hesselink, E.H. Hondius et al. (eds). 4th ed. The Hague London Boston, 2010. s. 619 649.
Keywords:
abuse of rights, preclusive effect, public interest, intent, tax relations, private law, legal order, circumvention of law.
