A Study on the «One-Stop» Diversified International Commercial Dispute Resolution Platform of the CICC in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative
( Pp. 164-170)

More about authors
Ren Yanyan lecturer, ; National Institute for SCO International Exchange and Judicial Cooperation
Shanghai University of Political Science and Law
Shanghai, China Qian Yiqing Postgraduate student in
Shanghai University of Political Science and Law
Shanghai, China
Abstract:
China has proposed to establish a «One-Stop» diversified international commercial dispute resolution platform (hereinafter «One-Stop» platform) in the CICC that effectively combines litigation, mediation and arbitration, which is one of the innovative measures of the CICC. However, the mechanism to effectively combine these three dispute resolution methods in the «One-Stop» platform is insufficient, the international expert committee has not been able to fully play its role, and there are difficulties in the recognition and enforcement of settlement agreements, arbitration awards, and court judgments after dispute resolution. In response to the above problems, the procedural mechanism of the «One-Stop» platform should be improved, the duties of the expert committee should be clarified, and China should consider introducing more diversified international treaties and improving domestic legislation so that the operation of the «One-Stop» dispute resolution platform can be supported by law. With such legal support, the operation of the «One-Stop» platform can provide public legal service products that are more in line with international needs.
How to Cite:
Shi Jianping, Wu Xinru A Study on the «One-Stop» Diversified International Commercial Dispute Resolution Platform of the CICC in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2023. Vol. 19. № 2. P. 171-175. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2023-19-2-171-175
Reference list:
Zhang Wei, More Than 415,000 Cases Were Accepted by Chinese Arbitration Institutions Last Year, Jurisprudence Daily, 2nd edition, 23 March 2022.
Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre: HKIAC Annual Report 2021 Reflections. P.8, https://www.hkiac.org/zh-hans/about-us/statistics, 2022-08-01.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre: SIAC Annual Report 2021, P.9, https://siac.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SIAC-AR2021-FinalFA.pdf. 2022-08-01.
National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China: Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road, http://lb.mofcom.gov.cn/article/jmxw/201504/20150400941645.shtml, 2022-08-02.
Belt and Road: List of countries that have signed Belt and Road cooperation documents with China, https://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/info/iList.jsp?cat_id=10122&info_id=77298&tm_id=126, 2022-08-02.
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, Chapter 1 Article 3, http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/rcep/rceppdf/d1z_en.pdf
Feng Shuo, Policy Motivation and Legal Guarantee of Overseas Arbitration Institutions In Mainland, Commercial Arbitration And Mediation, 2021, Issue 1, P.79.
Liu Xiaohong, Feng Shuo, Development of Foreign-Related Arbitration Legal System of China in the Past 40 Years of Reform and Opening-Up: History, Notion and Direction, International Law Studies, 2019, Issue 6, P.103.
Gu Weixia, The Developing Nature of Arbitration in Mainland China and Its Correlation with the Market: Institutional, Ad Hoc, and Foreign Institutions Seated in Mainland China, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 2017, Issue.10, P.266.
Reply of the Supreme People's Court to the Request for Instructions on the Case concerning the Application of Züblin International GmbH and Wuxi Woke General Engineering Rubber Co., Ltd. for Determining the Validity of the Arbitration Agreement (No.23 [2003] of No.4 Civil Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court).
Reply of the Supreme People's Court to the Request for Instructions on Issues concerning the Case of Shenhua Coal Trading Co. v. Marinic Shipping Company for Confirmation of an Arbitration Clause (No. 4 [2013] of the Civil Division IV of the Supreme People's Court).
Reply of the Supreme People's Court to the Request for the Dispute between Jiangsu Aerospace Wanyuan Wind Power Equipment Manufacturing Co., LTD and Elm Wind Turbine Blade Products (Tianjin) Co., LTD for Confirmation of the Validity of Arbitration Agreement (No.2 [2012] No.4 Civil Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court).
Reply of the Supreme People's Court to the Application of Beijing Chaolai Xinsheng Sports & Leisure Co., Ltd. for Recognition of the Arbitration Award Made by the Korea Commercial Arbitration Court (N0.64 [2013] of No.4 Civil Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court).
Zhang Zhengyi, Dong Yiwei, Empirical Study on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign arbitration Awards by Mainland Chinese Courts, Commercial Arbitration and Mediation, 2021, Issue 4, P.57.
Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (2021 Amendment), Article 280.
Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (2021 Amendment), Article 290.
United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958), Article 1.
Jijing & Wen Zhijun, Affirmation of Nationality Judged by International Commercial Arbitration, People's Judicial, 2019, Issue 14, P.69-P.71.
Zhe-04 Zhong Jian No.4. 2008.
Yang Honglei, Studies of the New York Convention from the Perspective of Jjudicial Practice in Mainland China Legal Press, 2006, P.93.
Chen Li, The Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award by ICC — «Non-Domestic Award» from the Perspective of the New York Convention, Studies in Law and Business, 2010, Issue 6, P.80-P.89.
Reply of the Supreme People's Court to the application for Confirmation of the Validity of the Arbitration Agreement between the Applicant, Anhui Longlide Packaging & Printing Co., Ltd. and the Respondent, BP Agnati S.R.L (No.13 [2012] No.4 Civil Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court).
Brenda Horrigan, Arthur Ma. The Longlide Case and Its Implication for Foreign Arbitration in Chinese Mainland. International Arbitration Law Review, 2014, Issue 6.
Hu-01 Min Te No.83. 2020.
Hu-01 Min Ren No.2 2013.
Monika Prusinowska, China as a Global Arbitration Player—Recent Developments of Chinese Arbitration System and Directions for Further Changes, Tsinghua China Law Review, 2017, Issue 10, P.42.
Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Providing Judicial Guarantee for the Building of Pilot Free Trade Zones (No. 34 [2016] of the Supreme People's Court), Article 9.
Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Providing Judicial Services and Guarantee for Comprehensively Deepening Reform and opening up in Hainan (No. 16 [2018] of the Supreme People's Court), Article 15.
Sui-04 Min Chu No.62. 2015.
The State Council on Issuing the Plan for Further Deepening the Reform and Opening-up of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (No. 21 [2015] of the State Council), http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-04/20/content_9631.htm. 2022-07-3030.
The State Council of Issuing the Framework Plan for the New Lingang Area of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (No. 15 [2019] of the State Council), http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-08/06/content_5419154.htm, 2022-07-30.
Administrative Measures for Lin-Gang Special Area of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (No. 19 [2019] of Shanghai Government), http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2319/nw12344/u26aw61615.html, 2022-07-30.
Administrative Measures for Business Offices Established by Overseas Arbitration Institutions in Lin-Gang Special Area of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (Hu Si Gui [2019] No. 5), https://sfj.sh.gov.cn/2020jcgk_gfxwj/20201102/93cb5f7fd32e48229600d46caef2839f.html, 2022-07-30.
The State Council of Issuing General Plan of China (Beijing) Pilot Free Trade Zone (No. 10 [2020] of the State Council), http://www.bjdx.gov.cn/bjsdxqrmzf/zwfw/ztlm/lqjs/lqzc/gjzc/1752579/index.html, 2022-07-30.
The Ministry of Commerce issued the General Plan for the Comprehensive Pilot Program for Further Opening up the Services Industry in Hainan Province (No. 64[2021] of the Ministry of Commerce), http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-04/24/content_5601789.htm, 2022-07-30.
Fei Ning & Sheng Chang Wang, «Slowly but Steadily, Mainland China Opens Door to Foreign Arbitration Institution, in Neil Kaplan», Michael Pryles and Chiann Bao (eds.) International Arbitration: When East Meets West-Liber Amicorum Michael Moser, 2020, P.197-P.203.
Administrative Measures for Business Offices Established by Overseas Arbitration Institutions in Lin-Gang Special Area of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, Article 4. Administrative Measures for Business Offices Established by Overseas Arbitration Institutions in Lin-Gang Special Area of China (Beijing) Pilot Free Trade Zone, Article 6.
Notice by the State Council of Issuing the Implementation of the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China in June 1996.
Keywords:
International Commercial Court, Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanism, Expert Committee..


Related Articles

INTERNATIONAL LAW Pages: 171-175 DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2023-19-2-171-175 Issue №24576
A Study on the «One-Stop» Diversified International Commercial Dispute Resolution Platform of the CICC in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative
International Commercial Court Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanism Expert Committee.
Show more
10. INTERNATIONAL LAW; EUROPEAN LAW 12.00.10 Pages: 230-239 DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2021-17-4-230-239 Issue №19457
China International Commercial Court (CICC): Innovation and Practice of Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanism
China International Commercial Court diversified dispute resolution mechanism
Show more